Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Admits Didn't Give Full Weapons Data To UN - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 07:50 PM
Original message
CIA Admits Didn't Give Full Weapons Data To UN - NYT
The CIA admitted it didn't provide the U.N. with information about 21 of 105 sites in Iraq singled out by U.S. intelligence before the war as highly suspected of housing illegal weapons, The New York Times reported in its Saturday edition.

The acknowledgement, in a Jan. 20 letter to Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., contradicts statements before the war by both CIA Director George Tenet and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, the Times said.

Tenet and Rice said the U.S. had briefed U.N. inspectors on all of the sites identified as "high value and moderate value" in the weapons hunt, the Times reported.

The statments came amid Congressional debate about giving U.N. inspectors more time to complete their search before the invasion, and helped bolster the White House case that it was fully cooperating with the inspectors and providing them with the best possible information.

http://framehosting.dowjonesnews.com/sample/samplestory.asp?StoryID=2004022122160000&Take=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drthais Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. and SO
I suppose we will find those pesky WMD's
in one of those hidey holes then? hmmm
...how convenient

don't mean to sound paranoid here
but I am waiting for the 'plant' anytime now


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those were obviously the places where this administration thought
they'd find the WMD. Sure they could have given the UN this information, but then they'd have had no reason to invade. These sites were held back to give Bush the "evidence" to cover his invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenGreenLimaBean Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why does Rice still have her job?
I'll answer that myself. Rice is an African American Women and
bush* needs the photo-op potential she brings him.

But then again, incompetence in the bush* administration is a
prerequisite for employment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's also because Rice is a stalwart neo-con ideologist
After snubbing the UN--and perhaps witholding information in order to further discredit the UN after the invasion and discovery of WMD at the "secret" sites--, Rice is now lending a hand in trashing the CIA:

"Asked about the contradiction between the CIA current account and Rice's letter, a NSC spokesman said 'Dr. Rice provided a good-faith answer to Senator Levin based on the best information that was made available to her,' the Times reported."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Because she is a liar
and fits right in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
California Democrat Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. On the other hand....
It seems unlikely that the UN would have actually acted on the information. They would have probably held a meeting, discussed a resolution for a month or two, and then condemned Israel for something or another.

In the meantime, any possible value from the intelligence (if there was any value) would have been shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Blix and Elbaradei were in Iraq conducting investigations
They asked repeatedly for all US data and did act on it. Blix's final report to the UN--which by ill-luck of the calendar came after the invasion--in part covered his findings at sites identified by the US, sites where he found no trace of WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wasn't the US OBLIGED to give all information to the UN?
But who cares anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Resulting in a $1,000,000,000 price tag for America.
For the search.

There's also the matter of $200,000,000,000 (and countless lives)spent on the effort to get that search team in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting that I don't see Tenet directly quoted anywhere...
...but this article has also attempted to lump him into the same category with Rice. IMHO, Rice is a category all by herself...unless you include the rest of the NeoCon lying dogs.

The NeoCon Junta continues to attempt to deflect blame away from themselves. Why they're attempting to blame the CIA is beyond my ability to understand. Every single time they've tried to cast Tenet and/or the CIA in a negative light since the Valerie Plame outing something damaging to the NeoCons has appeared in the press.

Want someone or some group to blame? Try the NeoCons in conjunction with their pet intelligence filter, the OSP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Republican motto ~ Better to ask forgiveness than permission
This seems to be the MO of this Administration. "Just do it" if it turns out wrong the deed is already done and what can they do about it. Standard Operating Procedure. Shoot first ask questions later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is huge...
More evidence this war was coming no matter what. Why else would the CIA lie except at the request of Cheney-Bush? They were trying to have it both ways. Using the OSP to exaggerate, magnify and distort the evidence to make it more ominous and then making the inspectors job more difficult by hiding and withholding the best evidence it did have. Smirk then took it further by twice asserting loudly and publicly that Saddam threw the inspectors out. This needs to be worked into our candidates stump speeches at every stop. Make it clear that Bush is a liar, cheater and thief. Its not as if we don't have lots of evidence to that effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC