Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evidence grows of Iran nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:44 PM
Original message
Evidence grows of Iran nukes
VIENNA (Reuters) - Western diplomats who follow the U.N. nuclear agency are increasingly certain Iran had an atomic weapons programme after recent reports that essential components had been found for making nuclear fuel or nuclear bombs.

Diplomats on the nuclear agency's governing board and a U.S. official said on Thursday U.N. inspectors in Iran had discovered components which were usable in advanced centrifuges for extracting enriched uranium.

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=461990§ion=news

also reported by Aljazeera

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2109FD7D-58AE-43D7-A9D0-38C726E2F14E.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karabekian Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. no suprise here
I for one didn't and still don't believe one word coming out of the mouths of the facist mullahs...

I believe we should do all we can to free Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbyboucher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So what if they have nukes.
What law says they cannot have nukes? If I were them, I'd be at it fast and furious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Under international law, any soverign nation has a right to build any
weapon it damned well pleases -- unless it has signed a treaty (or agreed to an armistice) that says otherwise.

International law prohibits wars-of-aggression (e.g. invading Iraq to steal its's oil); indeed, waging a war-of-aggression is "the supreme crime". Broadly speaking, international law regulates when & how weapons can be used, not the weapons themselves.

And -- under international law, all nations are equal; there is not one international law for the US (WMDs allowed) and a different international law for small countries with oil (WMDs prohibited).

Of course, Bu$h is out to change this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthman dave Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Does "doing all we can" include invading? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont like Bush Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think they are lying about having plutonium. Where is the proof? Just
because he says he has them doesn't mean he does. I think Bush is planting this in the news to help his election. I bet he took the weapons out of Iraq and planted them in Libya so he could frame them and look good in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. France 'investigating Libya WMD talks leak': Evidence
PARIS, Feb 19 (AFP) - France's foreign ministry and intelligence services are probing a leak of confidential embassy communications that showed Paris was aware of the US-British negotiations with Libya on weapons of mass destruction despite its assertions to the contrary, an online publication said Thursday.

The ministry and one agency, "probably" the domestic counter-espionage directorate, the DST, were looking into how an investigative and satirical newspaper, the Canard Enchaine, came into possession of the cables, extracts of which it published in its December 31 edition, the site, geopolitique.com, said.

The documents were from France's ambassadors in Canada, Libya and the United States and spoke about the negotiations between Britain, Libya and the United States which led to Tripoli's announcement December 22 that it was abandoning its efforts to make weapons of mass destruction.

France's government gave out conflicting reactions immediately after the news, with Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie saying Paris had been kept informed of the talks while Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin insisted that his ministry had not been in the loop.

Alliot-Marie eventually changed her public statements to agree with de Villepin.

But the Canard Enchaine's report, with the cable extracts, raised questions over how much Paris knew and whether it was covering something up.

A foreign ministry spokeswoman, Cecile Pozzo di Borgo, said of the geopolitique.com report that it was the ministry's policy to look into every leak of confidential information.

http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?subchannel_id=58&story_id=4912
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. George Bush makes me wish I had nukes myself.
"I believe we should do all we can to free Iran"

Until America frees itself, it can only enslave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Well, our military forces are stretched a bit thin right now....
Time for you to run down to the recruiter!

Do your part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I am fairly certain
that Vonnegut would disagree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. This sounds like a familiar tactic, doesn't it? And what happened to...
...all of those WMDs Iraq was supposed to have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's see if I have the calculations correct here...
Iraq + no nukes = Bush invades
North Korea + nukes = Bush looks the other way

If I were a rouge nation, I'd be thinking about getting me some nukes!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC