Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Discussion of Bush's Abortion of K Lowman dropped by AU'sSundayTimes, but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 01:32 PM
Original message
Discussion of Bush's Abortion of K Lowman dropped by AU'sSundayTimes, but
continues to be carried by UK's Mirror, and AU's Herald Sun.


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/content_objectid=13961727_method=full_siteid=50143_headline=-ABORTION-CLAIM-HITS-PRESIDENT-name_page.html

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,8722518%255E663,00.html

Bush abortion smear as mud flies

Phillip Coorey19feb04

PRESIDENT Bush faced an extraordinary claim last night that he once paid for a girlfriend's abortion.<snip>


Bush Abortion/new Flint Book in media in Aus(SundayTimes)&UK(Daily Mirror)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/content_objectid=13961727_method=... ABORTION CLAIM HITS PRESIDENT Feb 18 2004 By Mark Ellis, Foreign Editor

PORNOGRAPHER Larry Flynt says he has "nailed down" his claims George Bush, a pro-life campaigner, arranged for a girlfriend to have an abortion in the 1970s.Flynt, 61, a failed California governor candidate said: "I've talked to the woman's friends. I've tracked down the doctor who did the abortion, and the Bush people who arranged for the it. I've got the story nailed."He said he would publish his claims in a book at the height of the election season.<snip>Kerry, 60, has survived two failed smear attempts. Last night he launched a scathing attack on Bush's treatment of September 11 emergency workers. "I'm tired of these politicians who show up when the bagpipes are wailing. And then go back to Washington and forget," he said.

http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,8722518%25
(This has been scrubbed from the web site as of Noon EST 2/19)
... Bush abortion smear as mud fliesPhillip Coorey 19feb04

PRESIDENT Bush faced an extraordinary claim last night that he once paid for a girlfriend's abortion.<snip>While Mr Bush and Senator Kerry have so far steered clear of personal attacks, their unofficial supporters are stooping deep into the gutter. <snip>Now paralyzed porn king Larry Flynt is preparing to publish equally dubious claims that the pro-life Mr Bush once made a girlfriend have an abortion. <snip>Now Flynt, whose last political foray was a ham fisted run for Californian governor, plans to publish the abortion as fact in an upcoming book. "I got the story nailed," he said. "I've talked to the woman's friends, I've tracked down the doctor who did the abortion, I tracked down the Bush people who arranged for the abortion." The trouble for Senator Kerry is the Republicans, who have their backs to the wall at the moment, seize on such material as sanctioned mud-slinging by the Kerry camp. <snip>

And an old web reference from 2000

http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/elec22.htm
STORY ON BUSH ABORTION LOOKS FOR LEGS -- OFF MAINLINE MEDIA RADAR, BUT CHOICE ISSUE COULD BE HOT AS ELECTION NEARS (from 2000 election)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have one issue with this
While the article labels this story as a smear, this story is another eye-opener of a man's lack of honesty and integrity. The message is mired as reactionary tit-for-tat to Drudge, before it even gains momentum. Maybe that was the plan from the beginning from Matt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe its bound to make it over here into the Mainstream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only problem I have with this...
...is that the abortion and AWOL issues are both over 30 years old. And with both, all Chimpy has to do is say, "youthful indiscretion - I found God and a good woman, I'm a changed man, blah blah," and make either problem go away (he's done it before - especially to answer the cocaine use questions in 2000). At best, it's a flimsy flank attack.

However, we have literally TONS of recent examples to illustrate his lack of fitness to be president. We should be focusing more on that, than what happened 30 years ago.

Of course, gossip CAN be fun, especially when it involves Repug hypocrites!:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. ...I don't think time has anything to do with it alg0912
The attempt to hide these fact and cover 'em up is telling enough about the man's character. How long had junior known Ken Lay? Why won't junior turn over his Harken dealings, when he told the nation he had nothing to hide.

I have no problem exposing a lying pimping thug that attempts to pass himself off as a visionary, and the leader of this country. Anything less would be shameful. Nothing flimsy about 540 soldiers dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree - there's a pattern of behavior that stretches...
...his entire life. But, out of everything we have to work with, things that occurred 30 years ago are the weakest. I agree 100% that we should talk about Harken, and Kenny-Boy, and the AWOL file cleansing that Lt Col Burkett said he was privy to in 1997. We should really focus on more recent instances of his scumbaggedness.

Hmm, scumbaggedness isn't really a word, isn't it?;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. At the same time demonstrate that he has not changed for the better.
They may not commit the same type of crime as they did early on. But through time they develop a network and gain expertise in other types of crimes that may be more violent or involve a higher level of technique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Logically your sensibility rules over the aversion I have toward
this man. All I'm saying at this point let it be known for the world to know the counterfeit authenticity that junior brings us as a leader.

Let me buy you a drink - :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Love this photo of our Dear Leader ...
... from the Herald Sun article ... caption this ...

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,1658,322194,00.jpg
Say what?: Bush denies the allegations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kutastha Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ugh
Nice lipstick George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Is he man or beast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about the woman's right to privacy?
And aren't medical records supposed to be confidential? Do we need this kind of mud slinging coming from us? When you try to sling mud, you are always going to get your own hands pretty dirty.

And calling Larry Flynt a failed candidate for governor? He was about as serious a candidate as Gary Coleman was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I bow to your wisdom
"When you try to sling mud, you are always going to get your own hands pretty dirty."

Brilliant little metaphor! :eyes:



I guess we should apply the privacy standards to Skilling, Lay, Bush himself and everybody else.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. What privacy, release her name and park the TV trucks in the front yard
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 03:16 PM by demdave
Then if we are lucky we might be able to get an exclusive interview with her current family, or even children :bounce:, and ask them if they knew their wife/mother had had an abortion when she was young. Who knows, maybe it will cause such a stir that her current marriage could break up and we could blame Bush for that also.

I mean, it really doesn't matter what kind of harm we could possibly do to this woman's family and life by bringing up facts from her past, right? I figure she has it coming just for having slept with Bush.:puke:

Go get her Larry. <sarcasm>


BTW, in reply to this exact post on a similar thread, I got a reply with her married and maiden name and a link.

I guess basic privacy rights take a backseat to some peoples political agendas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. She deserves the same right to privacy that Clinton and Monica got.
Am I saying two wrongs make a right?

Yes, when you're dealing with someone as evil as Bush, sometimes an innocent person may have to suffer some emotional pain so that an entire country can be freed from tyrrany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. BURN HER, BURN HER!!!!!
It suits our purpose. Rights be damned!! We can be as ignorant and misdirected as the next man and WE WILL PROVE IT! Shoot the innocent if they get in our way because we fight for what's right and for the rights of al....er....some. Yeah, that's it ...the rights of some, when convenient.

Quick, everone get behind our moral compass, Larry Flynt.

P.S. I refuse to even label this sarcasm anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Flynt has had this story for years
Now why do you think he hasn't published it?
Because the woman does not wish to come forward.
Without her permission, Flynt will not identify her. (Unlike Drudge).
He would be sued out of existence and he knows that.
There is no way Flynt will name her without permission.
Flynt seems to have higher standards than people like Drudge and Scaife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Um...are you endorsing the idea of "collateral damage"?
See, that's not a progressive stance.

I pretty much almost never agree with "Dem"Dave, but I do here. I'm stunned that some think it's okay to drag an innocent woman through the mud for something that may have happened 30+ years ago, which could backfire, and which requires violating the principle of the right to privacy, which so many of us (yourself included, I'm certain) have defended over the years.

b*sh is giving us all the rope we need to electorally hang his treasonous ass. Let's try to keep our ethics intact while we bring him down, or else we're not much better than the freepers and rightwing nutjobs of the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's why Dems got their asses kicked in the last two elections.
"We aren't going to stoop to their level." Well great, how do we like losing? Because we better get used to it.

Besides, the woman can write a big tell all book and make a million dollars . . . it's the American way.

And lastly, her identity need not be revealed for the story to go forward--what we're talking about here is not abortion and who got one, which should have always been her or anyone's right, we're talking about BUSH HYPOCRISY (do as I say, not as I do)and his rightwing fundamentalist base that sees him as more MORAL than the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. What world are you living in?
You think this story will last 2 minutes before every detail of her life is exposed? I already had a reply with her married and maiden name and a link. People are more than willing to throw her and her family to the wolves.


We are not talking about BUSH HYPOCRISY (do as I say, not as I do), we are talking about our hypocrisy. Either you believe in the right to privacy, especially the right to medical privacy, or you don't. This is not something you can waver on when it is in your political favor.....that IS hypocrisy!

Interesting how quickly you are willing to sacrifice her "emotional pain" after admitting she is an innocent in this matter. Who or what will you be willing to sacrifice next for your short term political agenda? Maybe you can interview her children about their mother's previously unknown abortion. That should be a real heartstring puller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Deleted for morality
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 07:11 PM by 0007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Wow! Demdave and Silverhair are for letting another good example
highlighting bunkerboy's hypocrisy and lies go unchallenged or get buried.

I am shocked!

Didn't take long, did it?!

Can you guys ever offer anything other than a losing strategy?

With all your "advice" over the past few months, we might as well put on our jammies, sit on our hands, and just send the repukes love notes.

Oh, and sit home instead of vote, because our great, war time pretzledent surely deserves re-"election"!

If we don't give back everything they dish out, and more, we WILL lose.

If that's the rules they are playing by, we had better play better than them and play to win.

Nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. We will lose crying about things that MIGHT have happen 30 yrs ago
AWOL and a pregnant girl? Is that what we are about? How about job loss or an economy going into the tank? These are topics that resonate.

As for sitting at home and not voting, get real. Find someone who is more ardent about everyone voting than I and I will shake their hand.

But you go right ahead and keep screaming about AWOL and invade some woman's private life and medical records. I am sure that you will be comfortable wallowing in the mud trying to get traction on those "issues".

Oh, remember, when the insignificant issues let you down and drain the real resource, time, then you can always cry in your beer the day after the election and complain about the voting machines being fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mushroom Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I'm with you Silverhair
As for Larry Flynt, what's that saying, something about sleeping with dogs and waking up with fleas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. What about the imperative to prosecute rapists?
Those supercede privacy rights.Is it better to allow a rapist to run free so that a victim can maintain their privacy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ooh, weird area.
It's like the devil saying "If you strangle this puppy, Bush is out of the WH on Friday."

Do you strangle the puppy? Maybe. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. No, seriously. What is the normal process for prosecuting
a rapist? If Flynt's story is true it is alot more than just a titillating story; it is crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. It is a difficult question. It differs from state to state.
Most of the states have statute of limitations for most sexual offenses, other than rape. http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/sexual_assault_statutes.pdf
I haven't heard any claim that the woman was forcibly raped. If you are saying that she was underage then that would fall in the sexual assault area for most states. In this area there is usually a statute of limitations unless it is an aggravated assault, that is with the use of force,coercion or a weapon. (as an aside...I would consider this rape also)

So all in all, I wouldn't think this would be actionable in most states. Do you know what state it was to have occurred?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC