Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi dismisses need for bipartisanship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:26 PM
Original message
Pelosi dismisses need for bipartisanship
Source: The Hill

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she didn’t come to Washington to be “bipartisan”, one day after shuttling through an $819 economic stimulus bill without a single Republican vote.

“I didn’t come here to be partisan, I didn’t come here to be bipartisan,” Pelosi told reporters at her weekly press conference. “I came here, as did my colleagues, to be nonpartisan, to work for the American people, to do what is in their interest.”

Pelosi expressed no regrets over passing the stimulus measure without any GOP support. Republicans followed their leaders in objecting to the bill on the grounds that it was put together without GOP input, and that it would not do enough to stimulate the economy.

Repeating the term “nonpartisan” on more than one occasion in describing the bill, the Speaker said her goal was to put President Obama’s vision on paper for the good of the country regardless of the type of support it garnered.

“The president’s agenda is reflected in this legislation,” the Speaker said. “People vote for what they believe in. Clearly, Republicans did not believe in (that) agenda … I think they probably voted their conscience.”

Read more: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-very-happy-with-stimulus-vote-2009-01-29.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:29 PM
Original message
voted their conscience?? Nancy?
voted against the American people and the country is more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. Most R's lack consciences.
They vote their wallets, 9 times out of 10.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't tell me Pelosi is actually wising up!!?
"Bipartisan" is just Republican codespeak for "let us keep fucking with you"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I remember GOP "bipartisanship".
We saw disgusting examples of it in the House a couple of sessions back. LOL -- amazing how quickly the GOP forgets the definition of it! :crazy:

We need to fund Alzheimers research and use the GOP reps as a test group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Hey. Better late than never (especially after her last 8 years).
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 06:44 PM by PFunk
Looks like any chances of bipartisanship is out the window. The battlelines are now being drawn and blue dog dems better (really) decide which side they're on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow. Nancy is finally letting a little of that liberal in her shine through.
All I can say is you GO girl and don't you stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. There should be no regrets about passing the stimulus
The fuckers had every opportunity to participate. They didn't get their beloved tax cuts and went right back to their partisan ways.

I suspect that is how they plan on working for the next 2 years at least. They will try to make it look like the liberals are spending this country into debt when it was their 12 years of reign that got us to where we are today.

FUCK EM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the use of the word "nonpartisan" is a stupid idea. We didn't vote for nonpartisans last Nov
As if the Democratic leadership hasn't had enough trouble letting us know what their principles are. Now they act like there's no need for them. As if there's a virtue in being neutral. Clumsy, idiotic framing! It's like they're freakin afraid of their own success!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. At the very first chance for the minority to demonstrate
bipartisanship, they failed.

Speaker Pelosi should understand that she is Speaker of the House. The House is different from the Senate: in the House, the majority rules. Period.

I would like it very much if Pelosi would step up and be the tough leader we need in the House. This realization is a step in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting headline
It looks like Pelosi was dismissing the need for bipartisanship and partisanship, but only one element of her statement slipped into the headline. I wonder what the editorial thought process at The Hill was for the decision they made? Because The Hill's choice of one word over another makes the headline in opposition to the facts of the story. I mean, if someone only had enough time to scan the headline, they'd get a completely wrong impression of Pelosi's remarks.

Very interesting, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh so NOW she realizes she doesn't have to bend over backward to kiss Republican butt.
:banghead: Well better late than never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd rather had a good bill with zero repukes than a bad bill
with their token support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think the headline
is disingenuous and i am no Pelosi fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Right On! Nancy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. thank you Nancy-finally! Do The People's biz-screw the Rethungs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hello !!! That's what we've been saying
for eight friggin years. :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Okay, but why did she have to say that Pubs voted their conscience? No Pub has one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Coulda fooled me these last 8 years, you fucking COWARD.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Bipartinship"
Grover Norquist says: "Bipartisanship is another name for date rape," and "We are trying to change the tones in the state capitals-and turn them toward bitter nastiness and partisanship."

But I HEARTILY approve of the President reaching his hand across the aisle in bipartisanship. So they SPAT on it? There are close to 60 Congressmen who may have to really CAMPAIGN to get re-elected in 2010, and "Roadblock Republican" may not be too popular a tag to the voters.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. Dennis Kucinich
should be the speaker,he would get things done.Bush would have been impeached,there would be a sane middle eastern policy,and he would put those republicans in their proper place,the dungeon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. That almost sounds like she's growing a notochord (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC