Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geithner Wins Confirmation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:36 PM
Original message
Geithner Wins Confirmation
Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — Timothy F. Geithner was sworn in as secretary of the Treasury on Monday evening, confirmed by a Senate majority that concluded that his experience in government and finance outweighed concerns about recent disclosures of some $34,000 in past tax delinquencies.

The vote was 60 to 34.

The tax controversy had delayed Mr. Geithner’s confirmation, keeping him from taking office right after Barack Obama’s inauguration last Tuesday as administration officials had hoped, given the economic emergency.

In a desultory two-hour Senate debate on Monday, opponents cited the tax issue to explain their votes against Mr. Geithner’s leading the Treasury, which oversees the Internal Revenue Service. A couple of populist senators objected as well to the leading role he played, as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in government bailouts of financial institutions over the last few months. As early as next week, the new secretary will announce changes for the bailout program that are expected to press banks to make more loans and reduce housing foreclosures. . .

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/us/politics/27geithner.html?hp



Basically a party line vote. Let's hope he does a great job. We all need it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sanders, Byrd, Harkin, Feingold voted against him-he is a tax cheat and will work against the people


I am over hope. Politicians are tap dancing to the bankers' tunes because they do not fear the wrath of the people.

On May 15th Congressional financial statements are due---how many Dems do you think lost significant money or net worth in 2008?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Does this mean he got six Republicans to vote for him?
Any idea who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Don't know which Republicans voted for him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Here are the Republicans that voted for him
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00015
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You hit the nail on the head. Congress members fear losing their own shareholder value in banks
if they nationalize the banking system more than they fear not being able to wrangle another term out of their angry constituents using the power of incumbency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. This guy is a crook
& smack in the middle of the global banking fraternity that have caused the world's economic woe's.

"Real Change" just got bought out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have never liked this nomination.
I never will. I don't understand it. I can only hope that Obama has something positive about it up his sleeve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Maybe Obama could use the threat of prosecution to get this guy to do "New Deal" kinds of things.
If it takes Machievellianism, well, hell, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. i guess we really need him.
if the economy were not in this bad shape, he never would have been confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The problem is that this Rubinite will do all the wrong things. (nt)
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 10:54 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC