Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indian H-1B visa techies in US may lose jobs in Microsoft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:52 PM
Original message
Indian H-1B visa techies in US may lose jobs in Microsoft
Source: Economic Times India

26 Jan 2009, 2113 hrs IST, PTI

WASHINGTON: Indian IT professionals working for Microsoft Corp in the US could be among those who lose jobs after it announced plans to sack 5,000 Coming to terms with lay-off employees with the software giant indicating some of the affected would likely be non-Americans amid calls to first target foreigners working on H-1B visas.

The world's biggest software company has been asked by an influential Republican Senator from Iowa Chuck Grassley to first fire foreign workers hired on H-1B visas, a majority of whom are Indians, while implementing the layoff plan and "protect" the jobs of Americans.

An indication that foreigners who also include Indians could be targetted during the layoffs came when a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement said, "We care about all our employees, so we are providing services and support to try to help every affected worker, whether they are US workers or foreign nationals working in this country on a visa."

The company has been in the forefront for expanding the H-1B visa programme, a temporary visa programme that lets American companies and universities hire thousands of foreign workers in a category considered by the government requiring specialised skills.

Dashing off a letter to the company after it recentlly announced its intention to slash the workforce by 5,000 in the next 18 months, Grassley voiced concern that this would result in American workers losing jobs and not the foreigners hired on H-1B or L visas.

"During a layoff, companies should not be retaining H-1B or other work visa programme employees over qualified American workers," Grassley said in the letter to Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer.



Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Indian_H-1B_visa_techies_in_US_may_lose_jobs_in_MS/articleshow/4033788.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. +2 - Wow....I agree with a Republican. How did that happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Grassley has also been investigating medical ties to
pharmaceutical companies, and exposing conflicts of interest which I am glad to see him do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'll take Grassley over Vilsack any day.
Unfortunately Vilsack is our new Sec of Ag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneFordA Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. I'm not clear about this "status"
... since H-1 is the first legal step a foreigner has to check off before he/she goes on to the next step. I think H-1b is TEMPORARY job status ONLY--and as such, employers can skirt a lot of labor laws already on the books and demand some mighty strange things. I think there was a company in Texas five or ten years ago that ended up with a BIG FAT omelette on the execs' faces because these "temps" were working 12 - 14 hour days SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. Stuff like that.

In short, this particular slot in the old immigration maze provides highly skilled obedient workers who aren't likely to rock any boats.

Nevertheless, at the end of the assignment, the law dictates they return to country of origin.

Even when an employer is willing to dot the i's and cross the t's for a foreigner's labor clearance, the law is specific: a foreigner cannot be legally employed in a job if there's an American citizen willing and/or able to take it. No ifs, ands or buts on that one.

Then and only then can the loooong and painstaking process toward a green card application be started.

Each year, only 20,000 applicants from designated countries get green cards. For some countries, this happens fast: for example, if an immigrant is from the United Kingdom or Germany, that queue is going to move at light speed: how many people from western Europe want to be permanent residents here? Especially when it comes to the differences in their health care system and ours?

For Indians and Chinese, the queue is almost ridiculously long: a plain old H-1 is good for three years. An applicant can renew for three more. And if s/he is lucky, the line will have moved forward enough that the old green card just might be in hand at the end of THAT time.

Then comes the waiting for citizenship: five years from the time of green card receipt if the immigrant applies on the basis of employment; three years if applying on the basis of being married to a US citizen.

While I want the system to make sure qualified American citizens take precedence in all matters of employment, I can't help but be greatly relieved there was no such thing as the INS when my ancestors ended up over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
61. If there's a choice between laying off a US citizen and someone with an H-1 visa,
The US citizen should be the one to stay employed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. A Republican of influence made the request to Microsoft?
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 01:00 PM by Deja Q
Cool.

(it's not about party lines; there are plenty of genuine Republicans out there and it's nice to know some of them are in positions of power and influence.)

Especially with the US appearing to be the keystone in the GLOBAL economy, a little protectionism right now is not an evil thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. "could be among those who..?"
:wtf: does that mean.

The H-1B workers should be laid off before a single American worker is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, they should. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. It does not sound ethical but...
I am sure Americans would be fired overseas without hesitation to preserve jobs for locals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
World Traveller Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. Bingo- Americans would be fired in foreign countries to preserve jobs for locals
VERY FEW countries have these easy labor laws that allow foreign personnel to be hired and replace the local citizens.

I worked in IT for 35 years, at the same major corporation for 30 years. When I began in 1978, everyone in IT was an American citizen.

By the time I left in 2007, over 60% were foreign-born, on H1B visas, L1 visas, or resident visas who had started out on H1B visas.

And this was not an IT company, it was simply a major U.S. multinational corporation looking to save money by replacing U.S. citizens with lower wage personnel.

Enrollment is way down in Computer Science departments at U.S. universities because the job prospects are so poor for U.S. citizens. U.S. companies have been able to import the labor that they need, no matter the effect on the tax-paying citizens (who now have to rescue U.S. banks, despite their own personal deteriorating balance sheets).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. To the greatest for that last sentence alone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:10 PM
Original message
They (H-1B's) better be on the layoff list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheHeathen Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ballmer's e-mail to employees regarding layoffs
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10147964-75.html

In response to the realities of a deteriorating economy, we're taking important steps to realign Microsoft's business. I want to tell you about what we're doing and why.

Today we announced second quarter revenue of $16.6 billion. This number is an increase of just 2 percent compared with the second quarter of last year and it is approximately $900 million below our earlier expectations.

The fact that we are growing at all during the worst recession in two generations reflects our strong business fundamentals and is a testament to your hard work. Our products provide great value to our customers. Our financial position is solid. We have made long-term investments that continue to pay off.

But it is also clear that we are not immune to the effects of the economy. Consumers and businesses have reined in spending, which is affecting PC shipments and IT expenditures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And their bugs make the rest of us work harder.
And lose interest in their future products.

Their hard work won't pay off much longer if their support and QC remain so pitifully low despite being a pitifully large company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. wait a sec!! they are GROWING but still have to layoff people??????????
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. With the US in recession/depression, ALL H-1B visas should be revoked immediately. Let them say no
American workers want these jobs. Bullshit. Send all of them home and bring our jobs back to the US from overseas. rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. That's probably pretty damned illegal
not to mention plain old shortsighted and not that bright. Not every H1 is taking an American job and not every H1 is in IT.

I work with a lot of H1 holders, it's Pharmaceuticals not tech but we really do need these people. I had a job open for 4 months and the only person with the right fit was a Canadian. No way in hell would I send her back to hire someone with no experience.

Mind you,these are pretty specialized scientists and it tends to be a pretty open field. Most of the folks I work with could go anywhere in the world and be in demand.

I think my favorite fix would be to take the techies out of the H1 fold all together. I always thought that program was to bring people to the US that were needed here. A lot of companies are using them to bring in dime a dozen IT positions just so they can ship them back and save money by making them work in their home country. This is kind of falling apart now that our dollar is in the shitter with the rest of the third world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. "Want"? Or "Need"?
A hooker is a want.

A domicile is a need.

A collectible Elmo doll is a want.

A piece of food is a need.

A condom is a want.

A computer with training materials is... well, it should certainly be a need as employers demand computer skills and will disqualify even people who prefer to use paper stationery over a blackberry or PDA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. interesting...but I'll believe it when I see it. It doesn't say they WILL BE cut before US workers.
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 01:40 PM by antigop
It just says "could be among those who lose jobs".

Still, at least it's making it into the news.

<edit to add> I COULD BE AMONG lottery winners this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Same here.
"May" doesn't mean definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azlady Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If a Company lets an H1-B go from their job..
they are required by law to pay for the moving of that H1B home to their country.... it will be interesting to see if they actually do this... It would be one thing to pay for the airfare home, that wouldn't stop them, but to pay for all of their belongings being shipped home... might cause them to give 2nd thought about the h1b's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Yep. I'm sure they will find a work around
Just like the workarounds they found to justify all the increased visas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. You would think they'd be the first to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. I often stay at a hotel near Microsoft headquarters.
I stay at one of the most popular hotels near Microsoft headquarters in Redmond, Washington. I've stayed there for several days each year for a number of years.

There is a free breakfast in a cafeteria each morning, so I've had a chance to see a lot of the guests. I can safely say that a full three quarters of the guests each morning are clearly from India. This hotel is affordable for long term stays, and it appears that many of the guests live there for weeks when they first arrive.

It would be interesting to know what percentage of Microsoft workers are H-1B status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azlady Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I was trying to find the data on # of H1'b workers here...
The stats show 126,220 for 2007, which includes new & renewal H1-bs....I'm sorry but that number seems way, way low....


I read an article a couple of weeks ago that stated that visa workers typically send half their salary home to their home country.... So I figured out, at the 126,220... say average salary of $50,000.. divide that in half $25,000 each H1b worker sends out of the country each year... total US Dollars leaving the country each year.... $3,155,500,000.00......

Now that is just with the H1b holders (which that number is WAY to low)... there are other visa workers here as well...
who knows what the actual US Dollar amounts leaving this country are.... geez.... another reason our economy is in the toilet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
41. Why do you care where they send their money?
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 05:39 PM by Starbucks Anarchist
Many other immigrants (non-H-1Bs) send money home, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azlady Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. ummm... It's not helping out the U.S. economy......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. So?
It's their money, and they can do what they want with it. They're taking care of their relatives who don't live here, which isn't hurting anybody.

By your logic, anybody who doesn't spend a disproportionate amount of their income on anything within the U.S. is guilty, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. and if they get sent home...
They're taking care of their relatives who don't live here, which isn't hurting anybody.


Then in terms of your logic... sending them home, and helping one of my relatives remain working, isn't hurt anyone either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I wasn't arguing the pros and cons of the H-1B program.
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 06:39 PM by Starbucks Anarchist
I was arguing the sentiment against what people do with their own money.

But if you want to debate what you just wrote:

Then in terms of your logic... sending them home, and helping one of my relatives remain working, isn't hurt anyone either.

Then it's not a totally valid comparison unless your unemployed relative supports you financially when he/she is working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. Way to dodge... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. What dodge?
I responded to a subthread about remittances, not about the H-1B program itself. You're the one who wanted to take it in another direction entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. I think what both posters were trying to get across
is the fact that immigration/visas are "supposed" to help the U.S. economy, but it's proven that it has not. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Yes, but the normal argument is that the H-1Bs undercut wages.
That is a very valid point, but arguing about what the H-1Bs do with their own money seems beside the point.

Ironically, if they did spend all their money here, much of it would go towards consuming Chinese-made junk, so I fail to see the anger about remittances, though I do understand the anger about undercutting wages via the program itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azlady Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. Starbucks Anarchist - My post was not about anger to where money is/was spent
It was for information - if usa billions of dollars leaving the country it has an impact on the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. But it's a drop in the bucket.
Offshore tax shelters take much more money out of the U.S. economy by comparison.

And H-1Bs wouldn't send money back home if their relatives immigrated here, but some people (*not* necessarily you personally) would object to that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Wow....Speaks Volumes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. My son works for Microsoft
Even when he did two summer internships before being hired, they put him in apartments that they have agreements with, not hotels. But they did put him in a hotel when he went for interviews.

I know a lot of people here hate Microsoft, but they have always been very good to him. Most of the people he works with are left leaning. He is a big Obama fan - in fact he talked me into supporting Obama over John Edwards. Last week he told me he wanted to start doing volunteer work as a result of Obama's encouragement to do so.

He called last night and I asked him if he was worried that his job was in jeapordy. He doesnt think so because he said the group he works in wont be affected by the layoffs. But I worry for him because I dont think Microsoft would demoralize their employees by telling them beforehand that their project might be cancelled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. It's like that in a lot of tech-heavy areas.
I spend one week each month working in my company's headquarters in a tech hub in the SF Bay area, and the hotel I stay in while there (also an extended-stay type place) is normally pretty much full of folks from the South Asian subcontinent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wow, I'm speechless!
Something that actually makes SENSE in these fucking trying times! Far to many H1-B's here to begin with!

Send them home! Bye bye. So solly...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good. Send them HOME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's about damned fucking time!!
Silicon Valley and Microsoft have been abusing the H-1B visa for YEARS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not Good Enough.
There should be written laws preventing the termination of US Employees over H1Bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemdem Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Agreed.
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 03:55 PM by gemdem
Problem is as soon as there's a law, there will be a loophole. That's how we got this mess in the first place -- loopholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. My heart bleeds.
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. If they only lay off the H1B's the number will jump to 10,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue97keet Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. FOIA on H-1B
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 04:21 PM by blue97keet
In view of Obama's new orders on transparency, why should'nt Grassley and preferably the Democrats in congress force Microsoft to air their dirty laundry on H-1B under Freedom of Information Act?

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/01/_in_a_move_that.html?hpid=topnews


"In a move that pleased good government groups and some journalists, President Obama issued new orders today designed to improve the federal government's openness and transparency. The first memo instructs all agencies and departments to "adopt a presumption in favor" of Freedom of Information Act requests, while the second memo orders the director of the Office of Management and Budget to issue recommendations on making the federal government more transparent."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hell will freeze over before foreign workers get fired over natives. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
31. GOOD RIDDANCE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AyanEva Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. I agree with this completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. \/\/()()T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
46. Er guys, people are losing their jobs
it's not something to be pleased about. So what if they're Indian, getting pleasure from this is incredibly mean spirited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Agreed...I like the idea of improving the quality of life of everyone
in the world. Everyone has a family they love and want to take care of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. I think it's more of a 'it's time for justice for the American worker'
If we don't stand up as a nation to protect our jobs then who will?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Good Point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. They're not protecting US workers
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 08:06 PM by Anarcho-Socialist
they're being cut to protect corporate profits, and besides the gloating over Indians losing their jobs (not by you, but which occurred up-thread) isn't "justice for the American worker."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. Would any other foreign country in our current economic shape...
Keep foreign workers when their own unemployment rate was so high?

I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. I think you've missed the point of my message
100,000+ US citizens work in London at a time of a great recession in Britain. If they lose their jobs, I won't be gloating like what has occurred in this thread.

I am not arguing against giving US citizens priority in the US economy, it's the gloating over people losing their jobs which I find deeply offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. I think people are just disgusted/frustrated.....
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 08:22 PM by OhioChick
However, it must be placed where it belongs....with corporations and our elected officials. I see and agree with your point.

What I find offensive are the posts which I see from time to time arguing that foreign workers should have precedence over U.S. workers.....in the U.S.

That's why I responded with the fact that citizens from other countries surely wouldn't want to lose their jobs over foreigners.

On edit to add: I think poster #49 hit the nail on the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desperadoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. How many H1B visa holders are here?
""
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. Love this picture...
First saw it captioned with the phrase:

"Would you have invested a few million bucks in these geeks?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
62. They do not care about the US worker any more only profits
so Indians will go on working while citizens are dumped.
This nation has cancer.

The next question is what do we do about it ?

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Write your Senators and Congressman/woman.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
66. Nah. They'll probably go back to India and start an outsourcing company which
will receive contracts from microsoft. Same employees, different location, lower salaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
67. XP programmers have completed the project...
Good job!

Way to sink another IT project!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sledgehammer Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
68. Just curious, if the article's headline was...
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 12:17 PM by sledgehammer
"Mexican illegal immigrants in US may lose jobs in Company XYZ"...

...what would the reaction be around here?

Would we hear things like:

"Good, send the leeches back to Mexico" (note: sub-thread was subsequently deleted)
"Good Riddance"
"Good. Send them HOME"
"It's about damned fucking time"
"My heart bleeds...Not"
etc.

My guess is we wouldn't, and hopefully I am not wrong about that.

BTW, I totally give Grassley two thumbs way up here. And I'm all for the Durbin-Grassley bill. But I just want to shed light on the level of vitriol toward a segment of society. It's easy to get caught up in it all, but it's a dangerous path (and, IMO, unbecoming of liberal minds).

The H-1 program (and other immigration programs) may totally suck - the feeling on this board is pretty clear. And arguing/criticizing the program leads to some great discussion.

But target the hate/blame where it needs to go - the companies who have abused the system ($$$) and govt (lack of oversight and commonsense regulation). Give a break to the H-1ers themselves. The vast majority came to this country legally, have followed all laws since being here, put their skills to good use, paid all their taxes, and most came to this great land in search of a better life.

That's as American a tradition as you can find, something which you and/or many of your ancestors probably did too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Dude, why do you continue to hijack Ohiochick's threads with that??
For Christ sakes, start your own damn thread. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sledgehammer Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. ?
My post is related to the original post of this thread and to the comments made in this thread. So didn't think I needed to start another thread.

PS: Nothing to do with OhioChick at all. Thread could have been started by anyone. It just happens that most H-1 threads are started by her. I sincerely applaud her incredible efforts in keeping some amazing discussions going, and never wavering on the fight for the American worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC