Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morales promises ‘democratic revolution’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:47 PM
Original message
Morales promises ‘democratic revolution’
Source: Financial Times

Morales promises ‘democratic revolution’
By Naomi Mapstone in Lima and Andres Schipani in La Paz

Published: January 23 2009 17:46 | Last updated: January 23 2009 17:46

Evo Morales, Bolivia’s popular leftwing president, has ended his campaign for a new constitution ahead of Sunday’s national referendum with promises of “democratic revolution” and a new era of equality for the volatile Andean nation.

At a rally in La Paz, thousands of supporters waved the multicoloured check flag of indigenous people and chanted “Evo, yes!” beneath a giant inflatable figure of Mr Morales in a trademark striped woollen jumper.

For Mr Morales, Bolivia’s first indigenous president, the rally was a celebration of three years in office, and a milestone in his bid to extend state control over natural resources and redistribute land and set quotas for indigenous groups in government.

“There will be millions and millions of Bolivians who will guarantee the approval of the new constitution to refound Bolivia so as to be a new state with equal opportunities, a new state where everyone will have the same rights and duties,” Mr Morales said. “Brothers and sisters, we have to guarantee this democratic revolution with Evo Morales or without Evo Morales.”

Bolivians are widely expected to vote in favour of the constitution, which endorses “community justice” and the election of judges, removes Catholicism as the state religion and, in a supplementary question, seeks to limit landholdings to 5,000 hectares or 10,000 ha.



Read more: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/081d4d04-e957-11dd-9535-0000779fd2ac.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Key elements of new Bolivian constitution being voted on Sunday
Updated: 52 minutes ago

Key elements of new Bolivian constitution being voted on Sunday
By the Associated Press
4:11 PM EST, January 23, 2009

Key elements in the proposed constitution going before Bolivian voters Sunday:

RE-ELECTION: Presidents can serve two consecutive five-year terms. Current constitution permits two terms, but not consecutive. Morales could thus remain in office through 2014.

INDIGENOUS RIGHTS: Recognizes self-determination of 36 distinct Indian "nations." Sets aside seats in Congress for minority indigenous groups but not for the Aymara and Quechua, who together comprise the majority in Bolivia's western highlands.

LAND: Voters decide in the referendum whether future land ownership should be capped at 12,000 or 24,000 acres (5,000 or 10,000 hectares). Current holdings are grandfathered in. The state can seize land that doesn't perform a "social function" or was fraudulently obtained.

JUSTICE: Judges on Bolivia's highest court are elected rather than appointed by the president as current law provides. The state recognizes indigenous groups' practice of "community justice" based traditional customs.

LOCAL AUTONOMY: Eastern lowland provinces can set up state assemblies that control local issues, but not land reform or natural gas revenues. Indigenous groups are granted self-rule on traditional lands inside existing states. All autonomies have "equal rank."

NATURAL RESOURCES: The state controls all mineral and oil and gas reserves. Indigenous groups get control of all renewable resources on their land. Water is a fundamental human right that cannot be controlled by private companies.

More:
http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-lt-bolivia-referendum-glance,0,7824620.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. community justice??? you decide. (looks like a good Bolivia blog)
http://www.democracyctr.org/blog/2008/03/community-justice-in-bolivia-beyond.html

the site is worth the read including the comments.


Community Justice in Bolivia: Beyond the Misconceptions
Readers:

Buried in the heated debate over Bolivia's proposed new Constitution are the details of what that new political foundation would include. One of the most visible demands that has been woven into MAS' proposed Constitution is to move Bolivia toward being a "plurinational" nation, in which many diverse culture's and ethnicities reside side by side, but with a certain new measure of independence and self-government. And chief among those aspects of independence is to allow indigenous communities to weave into existing traditional justice systems (courts, prosecutors, police) systems of "community justice".

But what is "community justice"? Far too often, critics or those just uneducated about the term, have tried to equate it with vigil antiism or lynching. To be certain, incidents of Bolivians taking justice into their own hands – including the recent case of three police officers killed by an angry mob amidst accusations of corruption – are plentiful in Bolivia, and tragic. But mob justice and community justice are not the same thing, not by a long shot.

To shed light on this important issue we bring you a post from two members of The Democracy Center team, Aldo Orellana and Yi-Ching Hwang. For readers interested in a more general report on Constitutional reform in Bolivia, we encourage you to have a look at The Democracy Center briefing paper on the issue, Re-Founding Bolivia: A Nation's Struggle Over Constitutional Reform (available here).

Jim Shultz


Community Justice in Bolivia: Beyond the Misconceptions

Last August, as Bolivia's Constituent Assembly debated the outlines of a new national Constitution, more than 100 indigenous leaders and representatives pressed a demand that the new plan formally recognize and legalize "judicial pluralism" and "community justice" as a key element. But what, exactly, does "community justice" mean in Bolivia?

A System with Deep Historic Roots

Community justice “in its traditional form in indigenous Andean villages...emphasizes reconciliation and rehabilitation," explains Daniel Goldstein, Director of the Center for Latin American Studies at Rutgers University, who has researched the topic extensively in Bolivia over a decade. "Rather than violent torture and execution, community justice promotes the 'reeducation' of community members who violate collective norms and rules, and the reincorporation of these offenders back into the community.”

In the eyes of its supporters, it is a move toward using dialog, community service work, and the restoration of harmony as a basis for dealing with conflicts. In other words, if you steal your neighbor's cow you might be required to help lay bricks for a school as opposed to being turned over to police and prosecutors many miles away.

To its critics it is a license for violence and brutality against those suspects of offending community sensibilities. Or in other words, you steal a cow and you get beaten for it.

One of those critics, the New York-based Human Rights Foundation, has warned that Bolivian Constitutional proposals for community justice will, “endanger some of the fundamental rights of Bolivian citizens”

But backers of the plan argue that such a foreign view of the issue disregards the cultural wealth that highlights ancient Andean traditions and customs. They argue that statements like those from the HRF fail to consider the role community justice has played for centuries in Bolivia’s Andean culture, with or without legal recognition, and its role in maintaining harmony and justice in communities far removed from cities where the formal judicial system takes place.

Critics have been quick to cite recent lynching incidents in Bolivia as evidence of what community justice would mean if fully implemented. But Bolivia's Minister of Community Justice, Valentín Ticona, insists that the linkage is a false one and that, in fact, the fundamental principle of the community justice system is respect for the human life.

An interesting exchange of letters between the HRF and the Bolivian government on the topic of community justice and lynching can be found on the HRF website.

Community Justice vs. Lynching

Rose Mary Acha, a Bolivian attorney and researcher who has investigated the topic for many years, defines lynching as “all acts done with one’s own hands to bring about justice .” This haphazard, usually mob-driven, approach to justice stands in stark contrast, she argues, to community justice in which there are “principles and procedures...rules to the game just like any other system. It is not just grab and hit,” added Acha.

At the end of February, in the small town of Epizana on the old Cochabamba-Santa Cruz highway about two hours outside of the city of Cochabamba, three police officers became the bloody victims of Bolivia's latest and most sensational public lynching incident. A violent mob descended on the out-of-uniform officers after reports that they had sought to extort money from a local driver who the police claimed lacked license plates for his car. Police corruption of this sort is woefully commonplace in Bolivia and a source of deep public resentment. The three police were brutally beaten to death.

The incidence was atrocious and shocking, and one of as many as more than 40 incidents in Bolivia in less than three months – as opposed to an estimated 57 cases in al of 2007 combined. The worrisome rise in such violence has provoked new debate over the failing state of security and justice throughout the country.

Since then another lynching has occurred on March 7, this time in the Santa Cruz department, marking the 41st case of this year in as little as three months, as compared to 57 cases in all of 2007.

Human rights activists in Bolivia warn that the rise is due to the fact that “the population does not find a response to their legal demands in the judicial system.”

The national director of the Special Force of Fight Against Crime (FELCC), Adolfo Espinoza, confirms that the justice system in-country is losing credibility, hence causing the rise in crime rates and lynching incidences.

“Lynching is a collective reaction of rage and of helplessness by groups of people that suffer from scarcity," says Acha. have-nots that feel fury at the corrupt politicians...the injustice...the lack of work.”

Reactions and Rage and a Deep Class Divide

Compared to wealthy elites who have access to private security measures, the poor who work several jobs from morning to night, often leaving their house unattended, are more likely to be robbed and experience exasperation for losing the little belongs they have.

have more economic power...they have other ways of protecting themselves – private security, high walls, alarms – which is not to say they are more respectful of others’ lives...we don’t know what kind of reactions they might have,” said Acha, noting the much higher incidence of lynching in more impoverished neighborhoods.

She further adds that lynching is primarily a product of insecurity. In the 90’s, the feeling of insecurity caused by economic instability of the country and its associated impacts such as job lose, relocation, and an increase in poverty level have led to an increase in incidences of lynching.

The correlation between economic and social insecurity and the rise in lynching is clear – and needs to be heeded in any debate about how to address crime and reaction to it in Bolivian society. The threat of more rampant lynching in Bolivia is not about whether community justice does or does not become part of the national constitution. It is about creating economic opportunity that spreads to the poorest and most marginalized. In Bolivia, social stability – from the neighborhood to the nation – goes hand in hand with economic stability. And that is something that 20 years of neoliberal economic reforms has failed to produce, and thus far, two years of movement in a different direction as well.

Written by Aldo Orellana and Yi-Ching Hwang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bolivia's native peoples poised to win new rights
Posted on Friday, January 23, 2009
Bolivia's native peoples poised to win new rights

COTA COTA BAJA, Bolivia — Highland Indian communities here remain rooted in the past. The towns have dirt streets. Farmers till their fields with hand plows. Pigs, sheep and cattle graze alongside dogs that run loose.

The men wear trousers, sandals and fedoras. Women prefer bowler hats, colorful shawls and multilayered skirts known as polleras. They carry infants on their backs, wrapped in the shawls. Most everyone chews green coca leaves to ward off hunger and the cold.

For the past three years, Bolivia's first indigenous president, Evo Morales, has made mostly symbolic improvements that have opened doors for the country's Indian majority. However, he's now put forth a new constitution Bolivians are expected to approve Sunday that seeks to empower the Indians and end their longtime status as second-class citizens.

"We want to create a new state with equal rights for everyone," Morales told jubilant supporters in the country's historic Plaza Murillo in La Paz on Thursday night.

~snip~
Bolivia is South America's poorest country. About 60 percent of the population lives on $2 a day or less. Bolivia has more Indians than any other Latin American country as a percentage of its population.

More:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/60633.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can't wait!
This will be a victory that to me, is almost as sweet as our election day was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me too. Vivo Morales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. A very, VERY important election! Thanks for the articles! Just this September,
the Bushwhacks funded and organized white separatist, fascist groups--the rich landowners--to try to start a civil war in Bolivia, with fascist rioting--sacking and trashing government and NGO buildings, beating up the indigenous, and also the police, blowing up a gas pipeline and machine-gunning some 30 unarmed peasants. President Morales threw the U.S. ambassador and the DEA out of Bolivia, for their part in this insurrection. That helped calm things down--it became a riot without direction--and UNASUR (new South American 'common market,' sans the U.S.) also stepped in, in defense of Morales and the integrity of Bolivia's borders. (The white separatists wanted to split off Bolivia's gas and oil rich eastern provinces.)

The white separatists wanted to pre-emptively split off from Bolivia (taking the country's main resources with them), rather than wait for a proper Constitutional process, which grants some autonomous powers but retains the federal structure and central power over resources and countrywide laws, taxes and other matters, such as human and civil rights. (Bolivia has a history of white enslavement of the indigenous.) The white separatists disgraced their cause throughout South America, with these U.S.-supported riots and murders, and were handed a stinging rebuff by UNASUR (which is also investigating the murders). UNASUR was also important in bringing the saner elements of the fascist faction to the peace table. This Constitutional vote IS the compromise. Morales gave up some things. They gave up some things (primarily secession).

If this vote proceeds according to law, Morales will win it. He is very popular--and most people understand that the new Constitution is essential to Bolivia's peace and sovereignty. As Evo said, with or without him, it needs to be done. The rights of the indigenous MUST be secured and made the law of the land. With Bush, Negroponte, Rice and that crowd out of the White House, and not funding and stirring up violence, Bolivia will have a chance to settle down. There is plenty of profit for everybody. Morales--who, like Hugo Chavez, has been an excellent manager of Bolivia's resources--nationalized the natural gas and renegotiated the contracts, doubling Bolivia's gas revenues from $1 billion a year to $2 billion. (This was one motive of the fascists--greed--the desire to steal what Morales had provided). Brazil and Argentina have been very cooperative with the Morales government, both on the gas contracts (they are Bolivia's main customers), and on backing UNASUR's efforts in Bolivia. (I believe that La Paz has been chosen as UNASUR's capitol city.) Brazil and Venezuela have pledged funds and support for the new highway that is being built across South America, form the Atlantic coast of Brazil, through Bolivia, to the Pacific, where Chile has settled a hundred year old dispute by granting Bolivia access to the sea. Bolivia will thus become a major trade route between the Atlantic and the Pacific coasts, for Asia-Pacific, African and other markets.

It appears that the rich landowners in Bolivia may have finally realized that their best interests are served by PEACE, and not colluding with Bushwhacks. They may have also realized that they were being USED*. If they're smart, they are rejecting the extremists among them, and giving up notions of civil war and secession--and facing the future, which is going to be dominated by leftist social justice and economic integration goals, throughout the region. I hope the vote will go peacefully, and its results will be readily accepted and implemented. All will benefit, if this happens.

----------

*(Rafael Correa, president of Ecuador, has said that the Bushwhacks have a three-country civil war strategy--Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela--for creating mayhem, and grabbing control of resources, most especially Venezuela's and Ecuador's oil. I suspect that the civil war plan in Bolivia was either a test run for the other two, or U.S. support for the separatists got foiled, and the remnant part of the plot, the local operatives, went wild with rioting and murder--which defeating their cause. Last year, Paraguay elected its first leftist president, ever--Fernando Lugo--who has stated that he wants U.S. troops out of his country. Paraguay was possibly the planned route for conveying support troops, weapons and other resources into the eastern provinces of Bolivia, where the insurrection was occurring. Another monkey wrench: The forces of evil lost the election in the U.S. However, it is yet to be seen whether or not President Obama really wants peace and improved relations in South America. The Bushwhack plots in Venezuela and Ecuador may still be in motion. They are much more important prizes to the Bushwhacks, because of their big oil reserves. It appears that the Bushwhacks were meeting with Venezuela's rightwing opposition, in Puerto Rico, only a week before the Obama's inauguration. The meeting was about how to prevent Chavez from running for president again in 2012. The issue of term limits, for all offices in Venezuela, will be voted on in February. As a stand-alone issue (not linked to 69 other amendments, including equal rights for women and gays), this referendum may well succeed, thus permitting Chavez to run for a third term. He would probably win. (He, too, is very popular.) And that would make the Bushwhack plan for the secession of the oil-rich Venezuelan state of Zulia, on the Caribbean, all the more difficult to pull off. In sum: What we have here is a potential "Bay of Pigs" for Obama, whereby private forces, say, orchestrated by the 'retired' Donald Rumsfeld, instigate military action, and then the locals, claiming to be "freedom fighters," request U.S. support for their "independence." Rumsfeld, in his op-ed of Dec '07 in the Washington Post, showed himself to be quite interested in events in South America, and, in this op-ed, he called for "swift action" by the U.S. in support of "friends and allies" in South America. Did he mean the fascists planning civil war in Bolivia, Venezuela and Ecuador? I think he did.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. And George Bush promised "Compassionate Conservatism"
Promises, promises :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, the huge difference is, Bush was obviously lying
Seeing as how he had previously jacked up Texas' execution rate and run the state into the ground.

So tell me the basis for putting Morales into the same camp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bolivia set to adopt new constitution empowering indigenous majority
Bolivia set to adopt new constitution empowering indigenous majority
Bolivians expected to endorse charter to end centuries of oppression for indigenous population
Rory Carroll, Latin America correspondent
and Andres Schipani in La Paz guardian.co.uk, Friday 23 January 2009 13.08 GMT

http://static.guim.co.uk.nyud.net:8090/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2009/1/23/1232703757852/An-Aymara-native-shows-th-001.jpg

An Aymara native shows the new constitution ahead of Sunday's vote.
Photograph: Aizar Raldes/AFP/Getty Images

Since Francisco Pizarro's conquistadors first clanked into their domain almost 500 years ago, Bolivia's indigenous people have been subjugated and marginalised by European overlords and their descendants.

But after a bruising struggle between supporters and opponents of President Evo Morales, the country is now poised to adopt a new constitution which could prove a watershed for South America. A referendum on Sunday is expected to endorse a charter which supporters say will empower the indigenous majority and roll back half a millennium of colonialism, discrimination and humiliation.

Indigenous leaders gathered in the baroque hall of La Paz's presidential palace this week to give thanks to their champion Morales, a former llama herder who rose to the highest office and delivered, as he promised, a revolution.

In a scene unimaginable just a few years ago the visitors, dressed in the ponchos, colourful skirts and bowler hats of highland peasants, played pan pipe music, chewed coca leaves and spilled alcohol on the mahogany floor as an offering to Pachamama, or Mother Earth, a goddess revered in the Andes.

"We will offer unanimous support to this new constitution," said David Choque, a traditional Aymara leader. His companions exploded in cries of "Jallalla", a call to arms and expression of triumph. Half a century ago indigenous people were banned from the palace.

More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/23/bolivia-indigenous-charter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IMPERIUM V Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. bolivia's comprador settler population is racist as hell.
i'm glad they're getting marginalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC