Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Your Vote Count? (WISH-TV investigation on voting machines)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 11:24 PM
Original message
Will Your Vote Count? (WISH-TV investigation on voting machines)
From Indianapolis WISH-TV, the CBS affiliate, a breaking news that was broadcast at the 11 PM news.

An I-Team 8 Investigation
Part One: Will Your Vote Count?

By Rick Dawson and Loni Smith McKown
I-Team 8


An I-Team 8 investigation reveals recent changes in voting technology have raised the risk of fraud and miscounting. The investigation finds serious questions about security and troubling concerns on both how the technology is sold, and who is getting rich on public money. It’s an investigation into the heart and soul of our way of government: your ability to vote.

<snip>

“It opens the possibility for a very quiet and subtle alteration of the vote nationally, by someone who wished to do that,” said Eugene Spafford, Purdue computer expert. That someone could be an insider or hacker who could electronically rig an election.

Another concern: testing of voting machines isn't tough enough and could miss problems. There's always the possibility of equipment failure.

<snip>

Karen Horseman helped choose Marion County's new machines. But she tells the I-Team she has reservations about the technology. “The companies that program them, who's watching them and what they're doing? Imagine how simple it would be to program a machine to read a ballot a certain way every third precinct,” said Horseman. “Instead of actually stuffing the ballot box, now you program it.”

http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. High quality reporting from a local news station.
High quality reporting from a local news station in Indianopolis.

And on the second page, they have a link to:

http://VerifiedVoting.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. THIS....is exactly why it will be impossible to beat them......
.....they won't need the supreme clowns this time...they've had 4 years to get as many of these machines in as many precints as they could....AND to bribe countless voter registration office workers nationwide....it's gonna take a REVOLUTION to make our country a democracy again...such a shame it didn't take place in 2000...the fix is IN for '04....just wait and see! :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Makes Kerry's ....
preemptive legal challenge look more and more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. you're right J T F
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 10:53 AM by BadGimp
Even the most basic cash register creates an audit tape/log of each transaction and the date / time of same. So even if there is no receipt to compare against, the log establishes the transaction record.

These machines do not.

No audit trail means there can be no audit or recount

If you can fix an election, why would you not?

The GOP in congress has allowed the voting technology companies to own the software that isused to count our votes. They have allowed the companies to claim trademark and business secrets rights over that code so it can not be subject to scrutiny. This effectively means that the very mechanism used to count our votes is held by a small group of GOP right wing radical business interests, funded and spurred on by the GOP mob in Congress. How convenient for them.

We're hosed here people.

No way this can be turned back by Nov 04. FLA set the tone by mandating just the other day, that there can not, and will not be any recounts for oprecincts using the touch screen machines. And the justification they use is simply brilliant.

Bush will win in Nov and there will be nothing we can to to change it then or now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. The Revolution has started
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Cool.
It really wouldn't hurt either to profile the backgrounds of the people running these companies. The scary collection of American Taliban all gathered in one place is WAY more than coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excellent point..... and who "certifies" the software that
we are not allowed to view. Just waht is The Election Center?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. R. Doug Lewis?!?
And Just who is R. Doug Lewis and who appointed him head of The Election Center? Major questions that need to be Answered.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. a link
Bev Harris is asking the same questions

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0308/S00072.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla_Dem Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does this mean when Kerry wins
the repukes will be filing legal challenges about the voting machines ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. My concerns with the report:
I watched the WISH report last night. I'm very happy that this is getting attention but they seemed to lump the new Marion County (Indy) system in with the touch screen systems.

We use a hand marked ballot that is then run through an optical scanner. I guess the scanner could be rigged but at least there would still be paper ballots for a recount.

I would have also have liked to see this info come up while the decisions were being made rather than after the touch screens are already in place.

I nearly jumped out of my chair when they showed the quote from the Diebold CEO about delivering votes to GWB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. The problem with Optical Scan Machines
is the same as with touch-screen machines. They use a program to count the ballots.

The only time a manual recount is done is when the vote is REALLY close, or if fraud is suspected. When someone wins 80% of the vote (see Chuck Hagel's "win"), there's no recount, because the margin is overwhelming. If the opscan counters are rigged, then the margin can be rigged as well as the individual count, so no manual recount happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not the same
At least if fraud is suspected ballots can be recounted by hand or another scanner. With touchscreen no recount is possible under any circumstances.

I would favor random recounts and testing of optical scanners. It's still a huge step forward from the old mechanical machines where no recount was possible.

If anything that uses a program is bad, then what is the alternative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. How about a manual count of ballots in a public arena?
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 11:32 AM by Mithras61
It's what many other democracies use. The French get their ballots counted in the local precinct by representatives of all parties, and numbers are posted publicly at the precinct. The counting is also viewed by as many witnesses as they can cram into the precinct building. They get their tallies in about 4 to 6 hours. Do you suppose we can wait 4 to 6 hours to get the final tally from our voting? After all, it used to take WEEKS to complete the ballot count. Now we expect the count within minutes of the closing of the polls. Why rush something so important?


Oh, and as to "not the same," as I said, it's only if the margin is large enough that they even consider doing a recount, and then they just run the ballots through the opscan machines again. If they get a significantly different answer on the second run, THEN they do a hand count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Indiana has big problems...
49% of voters will be using DRE's in November.

http://www.in.gov/sos/elections/voters/vot_sys.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. They use that system in Tippecanoe County...
Edited on Tue Feb-17-04 11:17 AM by BiggJawn
And there was an article in the local paper this past fall about how the county secures the machines. They are kept in a storeroom with TWO locks on the door, and a Democratic Party AND a Republican Party representative have a key....

And the county locksmith, and the janitor, and the Fire Department.....
Who do they think they're fooling?
Oh...Yeah...MOST of the Public.....

I also understand that it will do no good to cast an absentee ballot. they don't even bother to get the ballots out of storage unless the race is close or contested, THEN they count the absentee ballots. Otherwise, they're sent to the landfill (or more likely burned in the GOP leader's bar-b-q pit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. What about these companies offering DRE's
I am in contact with my state government over the concern that DRE have with the voting process.

He pointed out that in Iowa there are three DRE's that ARE approved for sale in Iowa, ES&S iVotronic, Fidlar-Doubleday EV200 and MicroVote EVM all of which are being used in Iowa, some for 10 years now with no reported problems, difficulty, or concerns.

Is there any concerns over these company's??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. ES&S
A subsidiary of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Check out Bev Harris' work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC