Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. newspapers tread lightly in rumor on Kerry infidelity (Wash Times)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:49 AM
Original message
U.S. newspapers tread lightly in rumor on Kerry infidelity (Wash Times)
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040216-121913-7446r.htm

The story is being shushed around the family dinner table — and in newspaper city rooms — but all the neighbors are talking about it.

What the neighbors are talking about are rumors of marital infidelity by Democratic White House front-runner John Kerry, and they have learned about them from the Internet, talk radio and the foreign press.

There has no been confirmation of the infidelity rumors, nor any admission by the parties directly involved. Mr. Kerry himself said there was nothing for him to talk about on a radio show Friday.

But the foreign press, U.S. tabloids and the Internet are writing and talking about it anyway. American newspapers are getting it into print by writing about not talking about it.

"White House hopeful John Kerry's campaign plunged into crisis last night amid sex scandal rumors," reported the Daily Record of Glasgow, Scotland. "U.S. website The Drudge Report, which revealed former President Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky, claimed married Kerry had a similar relationship with an intern."

Sneaky, sleazy, way for Moonie Times to get this in print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buckeye1 Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. So why post it?
I can find Drudge, what is your problem. Dean is still a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EXE619K Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What an intellectual response that was.
We shall see if "Dean is still the loser" come November.

We shall see.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. no offense
but even if Kerry dropped out, Edward would most likely be the candidate, not Dean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EXE619K Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. There are many ways for a battle to be defined as a "win".
More potential voters one "shuns", the less likely for a victory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am not shunning anyone
I am looking at the situation realistically.

Dean has not picked up one state yet for whatever reason, and Edwards is in second in most of the races except the one he won.

If you look at the unbiased polls, they follow this form:

1. Kerry
2. Edwards
3. Dean

I am not saying anthing is impossible, but it looks essentially like a two man race at this time.

As far as I am concerned I will vote for whoever gets the nomination, and that includes Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EXE619K Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. As you can see, I responded to another person....
in regards to the "shun" thing.

Not you, of course.

However, It's just a reminder that people will do funny things due to prolonged negativity in any situation.

That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Actually, you did NOT respond to another person
with regard to the shun thing. You may think you did, but you didn't. Just a reminder that people will do funny things due to prolonged negativity in any situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Here is the delegate count so far
Kerry 577 ~ Dean 198 ~ Edwards 166 ~ Sharpton 16 ~ Kucinich 2 The candidate needs 2163 delegates to lock it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. I think Dean very muched energized the Democratic base
indeed I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Oh for heaven's sake
A lot of us were Dean supporters, but now he's obviously a long-shot at best. You don't have to be obnoxious about it.

I'm okay with Kerry, but I come to DU to see what the latest is on the right-wing sleaze campaign. If someone posts stories from Drudge or the Washington Times, it's just to keep us informed, not to knock Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. If you don't want to see it don't read it Buckeye
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 09:56 AM by rmpalmer
Let's all put our heads in the sand like good Dems and not know what the Rethugs are saying and doing. Don't read the opposition, cancel your cable. Live in la-la land. Lose in November.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Breaks their hearts, doesn't it
They're getting quite concerned that the Big Scandal Story hasn't erupted in the media the way they wanted. So now the talking point is to express shock! and outrage! that Kerry is somehow getting a "pass" on this one.

It's in their newspapers now, and it's the only thing I heard all weekend on their talk radio. They're not giving up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. what could he do
Let's assume the story is NOT true. What could Kerry do about it anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. So far, only the RW media is providing details...
Drudge
Hollinger
NewsCorp
Moonie Times


First hand reporting (i.e. reporting that is not a regurgitation of the details, listing Drudge as the only source) of this rumor has been limited to these news entities. All are deeply biased conservative news sources. The only name missing from this list is Tribune-Review Publishing Co (Scaife). Surely, he can't be far behind...

Senator Kerry's "intern" -- all smoke, no fire - This is panning out to be a rumor. All Democrats, despite their candidate affiliation, should be fighting this type of tactic by the RW media.

I'm a Dean supporter and have been critical of Kerry, but we all need to band together and fight this. Dems reveling or perpetuating this unfounded rumor in hopes of furthering their candidate should be ashamed of themselves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" Page 3
Isn't this whole pattern (Drudge to Fox Rush to Wash Times) just pretty standard operating procedure????

Franken re Fox News Washington Times, New York Post, Editorial pages of WSJ,Talk Radio:

"The members of the right-wing media . . .employ a tried-and-true methodology. First, they concoct an imflammatory story that serves their political goals. . .They repeat it. . .They embellish it. . .They try to push it into the mainstream media. All too often they suceed. . .Occasionally, they fail. . .But even thier failures serve their agenda, as evidence of liberal bias. Win-win. You got to admit. It's a good racket."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Exactly. This is how the republican semen sleuths work.
Bush must be a little desperate to have Turd Blossom Rove bring this Bushshit out this early though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. The Daily Record. Yet another rubbish tabloid.
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 08:49 AM by Screaming Lord Byron
Again, of what concern is it to them? Isn't some Rangers player shagging a supermodel this week? That's their usual level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Washington Times treads lightly re: Rev Moon & Bush Family. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Who's surprised that the Washington Times is leaking this here.
After all, it does belong to Rupert Murdoch. You know they've been sitting on this for a long time just trying to figure how they're going to leak it out. Leak just enough to make people "wonder" if it really happened. I bet Rove and Rupert locked lips on this months ago and decided this dirty little secret would be leaked just before the Democratic candidate was selected. They have a lot of nerve talking about dirty politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The Washington Times is owned by Rev. Moon...
...but they all go to each other's Christmas parties, if you know what I mean.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. So the Washington Times
is covering the Glasgow Daily Record which is covering the Drudge Report which is covering second or third hand rumers, and is complaining that other American news media would rather get their information a little closer to the source?

Arnaud de Borchegrave, your journalistic integrity is calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. He won't take that call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Jesus, when you put it like that
It's just like coverage of Clinton all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. If I were Kerry....
'Matt Drudge, if you want to confront me with sleeze, here's the time and the place, in person to my face."

Kerry needs to learn how to win the media, the soundbites and the headlines. Bushie won the headline 'bush discloses all his military records.' It was all a lie but bushie won the headlines for the whole weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Definitely not top quality journalist reporting...
(snip)
There has no been confirmation of the infidelity rumors, nor any admission by the parties directly involved.
(snip)

They need to know how to write a sentence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC