Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman Execs Lose Bonuses, State Loses Millions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:17 PM
Original message
Goldman Execs Lose Bonuses, State Loses Millions
Source: AP

NEW YORK (AP) -- Underscoring how closely the fates of Wall Street and New York are intertwined, Gov. David Paterson said Friday that a single moment in the financial crisis. The decision by Goldman Sachs executives to forgo bonuses, cost the state millions of dollars.

The executives complied with the urging of New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and others who said in November that major Wall Street companies benefiting from federal bailouts shouldn't pay out the usual huge bonuses to executives.

Paterson says it was the right thing to do, but the result is a further hit to the fiscal crisis of state government.

``Things could go even more south in a big hurry,'' Paterson told reporters.

Losing tax revenue from bonuses was a big hit to New York's finances because Wall Street taxes accounted for 30 percent of state revenue in the last fiscal quarter.....

Read more: http://www.wcbs880.com/pages/3530409.php?contentType=4&contentId=3243002



30% of state revenue?!?!?! That is unbelievable. Shows how complicated an issue it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. That first sentence doesn't make any sense grammatically.
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 12:20 PM by Unsane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's a drop in the bucket.....
...compared to the hit the U.S. treasury is going to take come income tax time. Taxes are going to be raised, and they will have to be raised big time to make up for the upcoming shortfall!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You can raise them....
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 12:32 PM by WriteDown
but no one is making any money right now. No one is investing and no one is buying anything. Every dollar I'm making right now goes toward savings.

May be a drop in the bucket for you, but for the state of NY its a critical.

edited to combine posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. self delete
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 12:32 PM by WriteDown
repeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. If not paying bonuses saves jobs of secretaries and file clerks then it's worth it
They spend money too, and that money goes into the economy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. How much do they think the country will lose if
auto worker's jobs are left to die? How much do they pay in taxes income and other that won't be paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Boohoohoohoohoo!!
:cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry:

Those poor multi-millionaires and the poor, needy state government!!

(countdown to the idiotic trickle down screeching: 4 - 3 - 2 - 1)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Needy state government??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. About that "needy state government"
It's the thing that pays for Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Food Stamps, EDUCATION, and all kinds of silly things like that. I guess they're not too important though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. I get it. The State of NY goes into the shitter unless Wall Streeters get bonuses from TARP.
Thank you.

Wall Street steps up to the plate to save the people of New York.

Patriotism like that brings tears to my eyes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. No - It means you can't build a tax structure that depends on so few people
if they stop paying than the entire state financial health goes down the shitter. It is hard balancing a pyramid on its point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That's the way cigarette taxes work, too
If people quit smoking, then a sizable source of state revenue declines, too.

Now, I'm not a smoker, and never have been, but when you hitch your wagon to a particular horse, you will not get as far or as fast as if you had picked a more dependable horse. New York is like the bawdyhouses of the Old West, as long as the mine's producing gold ore, there will be partying, but when it's played out, the whole city is at risk of becoming a ghost town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. That is what needs to be realized.
The tax code's structure needs to be re-structured..

Sadly Rush & Co. will convice those stupid enough to listen that this shows we need to give the wealthy a break cause they do so much for us. It will also be a point repeated by the countless talking heads on TeeVee.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. maybe washington should bail out hedge funds next...fucking surreal all the corruption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Already done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Shows how complicated, AND how very much those guys
get in bonuses!

Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It also shows the poor judgement on the part of the state. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Eat the rich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Goldman paid about $16B in bonuses to roughly 30K employees
last year. This year, the bonus pool is about $10B...trouble for NY State is that not all of it is taxable. The maximum cash portion of the bonus is $400K...and employees will have a smaller cash payout...the rest is in the form of stock, which is not taxable until sold...which takes time as companies usually force their employees to vest their stock portions of their bonus. I am not sure how much of that $10B GS is paying in bonus comes in the form of cash, but my guess is that it is 25% or less in cash due to their preference for holding any bit of cash that it can these days...and from criticism over paying bonuses at all...no reason for them not to give bonuses in the form of stock though since it does not cost the company any cash and simply dilutes current shareholders (whom are mostly current/former employees anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lelgt60 Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. This line of argument is INSANE (or I am). Which is it?
On December 16, 2008, Goldman reported net earnings for the year 2008 (Nov 2007 thru Nov 2008) of $2.32 billion, including their 4th quarter loss. If they don't pay the bonuses ($178 million in STATE TAX for just 6 of them!!! What were they $500 million?), the money stays as profit and is taxed as corporate income. So the state still gets it, as well as the feds.

If they don't like the amount they get, just raise the corporate income tax, or pass a one time surcharge.

No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. eat the rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. It's the title of a book by P. J. O'Rourke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. I wonder how many hundreds of millions New York is handing out in tax incentives?
Maybe they should be looking at some smart budget cuts, rather than whining about a company not giving execs billions after laying off nearly a quarter of their work force...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
25. What is so bad about using money that was supposed to be given as exec. bonus...
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 04:28 AM by Lost-in-FL
back into a company to improve and create jobs ? Wouldn't that be better FOR EVERYONE than executives paying more state taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. Most state tax money comes from the personal income tax
And that tax is high, expecially on the well-to-do. Some have been warning for years that NY relied too much on the Financial Services industry and now the chickens are coming home to roost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Not as high as it was before Bush
BushCo's tax policies must shoulder much of the blame for the drop in state tax revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Perhaps some, but not really a factor
When you've laid off thousands and reduced cash bonuses by millions, a couple of percentage points don't mean much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. A couple of percentage points on tens of millions means A LOT
when Jeb Bush slashed taxes for the super rich in Florida (and there are MANY here) state funds dried up in no time-and that was long before the shit hit the fan in the rest of the country.

Don't kid yourself; the billions cut from taxes on the wealthy make a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Depends how it is calculated
But it is clear Bush's eceonomic policies were inferior - even to Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Whoa! One of the first observed instances of trickle down.
But note that it's the state getting the trickle, not the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC