Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Approves Measure to Ease Pension, IRA Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
420inTN Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:35 PM
Original message
Congress Approves Measure to Ease Pension, IRA Rules
Source: Bloomberg

By Brian Faler

Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Congress voted to ease pension-funding requirements and excuse older retirees from having to cash out retirement funds in an attempt to blunt the recession’s impact on their savings.

The Senate approved legislation today by unanimous consent to eliminate various penalties on companies whose pension funding falls below federal guidelines. The bill would also temporarily suspend requirements that people aged 70 1/2 begin cashing out assets in individual retirement accounts and 401(k) and 403(b) savings accounts.

“This vital legislation addresses the immediate needs of workers, retirees and businesses hit hard by the financial and economic crisis facing our country,” said Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat. “With trillions of dollars in retirement savings in serious jeopardy, the relief in this bill will help Americans weather the storm until the economy begins recovering.”

The vote, one day after the House approved the plan, sends the measure to President George W. Bush. White House Spokesman Tony Fratto declined to say whether Bush would sign the bill into law. “We continue to have concerns about measures to reduce funding for worker pensions,” Fratto said in an e-mail.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=avSKFVWh8_Ho&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have a bad feeling about this...
I feel "a step back" here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This article is a bunch of bull. This rule change only helps companies cheat employees
Kennedy is catapulting the propaganda with this

“This vital legislation addresses the immediate needs of workers, retirees and businesses hit hard by the financial and economic crisis facing our country,” said Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat. “With trillions of dollars in retirement savings in serious jeopardy, the relief in this bill will help Americans weather the storm until the economy begins recovering.”


Basically the rule is saying companies do not have to fund current unfunded pension costs. The major reason those unfunded pension costs are so high is because several years ago Congress originally relaxed the rules for funding pension costs. This downturn in the market just increased the unfunded situation. Now they are relaxing the funding rules AGAIN. Is there any dough in pension funds these days?

More cash available to pay exec bonuses I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm afraid Ted sold us out AGAIN on pensions
He and Baucus were the lead negotiators on the Pension "Protection" Act that legalized cash balance pension conversions. We were sold out by that legislation.

The Pension Protection Act did put in funding requirements--now they want to relax those requirements.

IMO--this is NOT good. Companies don't want to put money into their pension funds and this allows them to get by with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cash out what? n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. this refers to laws that require people to start
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 07:14 PM by karynnj
money out of things like IRAs at 70 1/2 years old - even if you don't need the money and taking it out now, if it is in stock that you think will recover some value before you need it. http://www.retirementthink.com/minimum-required-distributions/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elifino Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Just turned 70 last month
That is a relief to me, as I still work part-time and still contribute 25% of my gross before tax to my 401K. I changed to fixed interest about a year ago and converted what I could legally to a Roth three year CD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. If you are still working, you may not have to start withdrawals after 70.5
http://www.irs.gov/retirement/participant/article/0,,id=151787,00.html

"The required beginning date is April 1 of the first year after the later of the following years:

- Calendar year in which you reach age 70½.

- Calendar year in which you retire.

However, a plan may require you to begin receiving distributions by April 1 of the year after you reach age 70½, even if you have not retired."

"If you are a 5% owner of the employer maintaining the plan, then you must begin receiving distributions by April 1 of the first year after the calendar year in which you reach age 70½. Additional information to help you determine your required beginning date is included in Publication 575."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not there, yet, but knew that this was harsh on many
so it is good that Congress has done something to benefit regular folks, for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree - -it is not fair to reguire something that is against the
interests of teh people doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dabenpb Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. A better plan ...
would be to allow for total withdrawal of monies from 401k plans with no penalties. Fine, pay the payroll tax on the money (it would be better if one did not have to) but remove the 10%-20% penalty. 401k plans are a pipe dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC