Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'These documents make it clear ... ' (StarTribune excerpts of evasion)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:27 PM
Original message
'These documents make it clear ... ' (StarTribune excerpts of evasion)
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4371954.html

i guess since this was produced with public money, it's public property. what a lot of squirming.

------------------

Q Scott, a couple of questions I have -- the records that you handed out today, and other records that exist, indicate that the president did not perform any Guard duty during the months of December 1972, February or March of 1973. I'm wondering if you can tell us where he was during that period. And also, how is it that he managed to not make the medical requirements to remain on active flight duty status?

A John, the records that you're pointing to, these records are the payroll records; they're the point summaries. These records verify that he met the requirements necessary to fulfill his duties. These records --

Q That wasn't my question, Scott.

A These payroll records --

Q Scott, that wasn't my question, and you know it wasn't my question. Where was he in December of '72, February and March of '73? And why did he not fulfill the medical requirements to remain on active flight duty status?

A These records -- these records I'm holding here clearly document the president fulfilling his duties in the National Guard. The president was proud of his service. The president --

Q I asked a simple question; how about a simple answer?

A John, if you'll let me address the question, I'm coming to your answer, and I'd like --

Q Well, if you would address it -- maybe you could.

A I'm sorry, John. But this is an important issue that some chose to raise in the context of an election year, and the facts are important for people to know. And if you don't want to know the facts, that's fine. But I want to share the facts with you.

Q I do want to know the facts, which is why I keep asking the question. And I'll ask it one more time. Where was he in December of '72, February and March of '73? Why didn't he fulfill the medical requirements to remain on active flight duty status in 1972?

A The president recalls serving both when he was in Texas and when he was in Alabama. And that is what I can tell you. And we have provided you these documents that show clearly that the president of the United States fulfilled his duties. And that is the reason that he was honorably discharged from the National Guard. The president was proud of his service.

The president spent some of that time in Texas. He was a member of the Texas Air National Guard, and he was given permission, on a temporary basis, to perform equivalent duty while he was in Alabama. And he performed that duty. And the payroll records, that I think are very important for the public to have, clearly reflect that he served.

Q Scott, when Sen. Kerry goes around campaigning, there's frequently what they call "a band of brothers," a bunch of soldiers who served with him, who come forward and give testimonials for him. I see, in looking at our files in the campaign of 2000, it said that you were looking for people who served with to verify his account of service in the National Guard. Has the White House been able to find, like Sen. Kerry, "a band of brothers" or others who can testify about the president's service?

A All the information that we have we shared with you in 2000, that was relevant to this issue. And all the additional information that has come to our attention we have shared with you. The president was asked about this in his interview over the weekend, and the president made it clear, yes, I want all records to be made available that are relevant to this issue; that there are some out there that were making outrageous, baseless accusations. It was a shame that they brought it up four years ago. It was a shame that they brought it up again this year. And I think that the facts are very clear from these documents. These documents -- the payroll records and the point summaries verify that he was paid for serving and that he met his requirements.

Q Actually, I wasn't talking about documents, I was talking about people -- you know, comrades-in- arms --

A Right. That's why I said everything that came to our attention that was available, we made available at that time, during the 2000 campaign.

Q But you said you were looking for people -- and I take it you didn't find any people?

A I mean, obviously, we would have made people available. And we -- Mr. Lloyd, who has provided a statement to put some of this into context for everybody, made some public statements during that time period to verify the records that the president had fulfilled his duties. And he put out an additional statement now to put this into context. He's someone with some technical expertise and someone that understands these matters, because he was in the National Guard at the time.

Q Scott, can I follow on this, because I do think this is important. You know, it might strike some as odd that there isn't anyone who can stand up and say, I served with George W. Bush in Alabama, or in Houston in the Guard unit. Particularly because there are people, his superiors who have stepped forward -- in Alabama and in Houston -- who have said in the past several years that they have no recollection of him being there and serving. So isn't that odd that nobody -- you can't produce anyone to corroborate what these records purport to show?

A David, we're talking about some 30 years ago. You are perfectly welcome to go back and talk to individuals from that time period. But these documents --

Q Hey, we're trying. But I would have thought you guys would have had a real good handle on --

A -- these documents make it very clear that the president of the United States fulfilled his duties --

Q Well, that's subject to interpretation.

A No. When you serve, you are paid for that service. And these documents outline the days on which he was paid. That means he served. And these documents also show that he met his requirements. And it's just really a shame that people are continuing to bring this issue up.

To read the entire briefing, go to www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. "I asked a simple question, how about a simple answer"
Man oh man - this thing is about to spin outta control for the moron, I do believe. He's slipped and slimed his way through so much already, I'm hesitant to get my hopes up, but damn, that was some intense grilling, and scott had zip - ZIP! He couldn't aswer one question, kept repeating the same rehearsed lines over and over.

Responsibility comes a'knockin' g.w.moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just answer the frikkin question, Scottie
That's what we the American taxpayers are paying you for. Your first allegiance is to America. BushCo is way down the line of worthy priorities. Serve your nation. Just tell the truth, without favor or prejudice. let the chips fall where they may.

America demands the truth from it's commander in chief*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blockhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. "You just don't get it, do you Scottie?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well this solves one 'tinfoil' conspiracy
The various theories as to why Ari left...more time with family (yeah right)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interestingly, the White House URL
throws up a "File not Found" message. You think they removed it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsychoDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Looks like it
I get the same, file not found .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC