Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anxiety Takes Hold of Presidential Aides Caught Up in Leak Inquiry - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:36 PM
Original message
Anxiety Takes Hold of Presidential Aides Caught Up in Leak Inquiry - NYT
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON and DAVID JOHNSTON

WASHINGTON, Feb. 11 — It started almost casually last fall, with F.B.I. agents leaving business cards under doors around the White House, politely calling for appointments and even meeting some officials, without any lawyers present, over a few beers at a nearby bar.

But the investigation into who at the White House leaked the name of an undercover C.I.A. officer has become much more intense in the last few weeks. Some administration officials have been summoned for confrontational interviews. Current and former members of the White House's communications and foreign policy teams have hired lawyers. At least a handful of White House aides have had to appear before a federal grand jury.

At the White House, the topic is rarely discussed openly among those who have already been drawn into the investigation and those who think they may be, people who have been questioned in the case said. The result, they said, is an information vacuum that is being filled to some extent by fear of what current or former colleagues may be telling investigators.


more

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/12/politics/12LEAK.html



Gnash, gnash, gnash.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Drip, drip, drip
The flood cometh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. and no wonder the gossip mill is working overtime
The flood is coming. These scum will go down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Womblestuffer Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. the cockroaches are running from the light
Hope Cheney or Rove burns for this, The media is starting to get fair and balanced
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sweet!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder how long it will be
before the first one is frog-marched out of the white house?
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. heh heh heh
Oh what a tangled web we weave......


Couldn't be happening to a more deserving gaggle of felons and traitors.

When will Novak be shot? I think that should be televised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I dislike Novak, but don't want him shot.
He reminds me of my (just as obnoxious, and even more racist) grandfather - now 20 years deceased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Okay. Fine. Hung, drawn and quartered, then
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakfs Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. No, not shot
That would be too easy.

Perp walk him on the evening news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. I 'Ve said it before I'll say it again
I want to see them tarred and feathered, stripped of their assets and standing in the street with a sign that says "WILL WORK FOR FOOD"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Stomachs churning, sleepless nights
You know who you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Tough times in the bowels of the gutter?
They are getting pressure from everyone..including Rove. Not worth all the money on earth to work there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. maniacal cackling
this makes me shiver with delight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Watch out - bad karma to delight in misery of others
Heh Heh. HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. How do you spell that German word?
Starts with an s, ends with a d ... Oh, crap, I'm too lazy to look it up. Anyway, the one meaning taking pleasure in others' bad fortunes. I got me a bad case of that, however you spell it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. schadenfreude
A malicious satisfaction in the misfortunes of others.

http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2000/05/10.html

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Moderation in all things, including moderation.
Bwaaahahahahah. All their base are belong to us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. See, this is why I rarely read the NYT anymore
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 04:31 PM by skypilot
"A White House that has largely avoided scandal..."?!?!

What the fuck does THAT mean? Avoided scandal? What it SHOULD say is "A White House that has avoided indictments..."

On edit: And that is the SECOND time that I have read that description of this administration in the NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Ha, Good one. That would be a great headline!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Good...they cost the Clinton aides plenty with their witch hunts...now let
bastards pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. agreed, NYT is whitewashing this
So although White House officials have publicly pledged to help investigators, there is some resistance just beneath the surface. Some people who have spoken with investigators say they have refused to sign statements that would waive any promise of confidentiality they received from reporters. The effort to obtain the statements is apparently intended to deprive journalists who wrote about the leak an ability, if questioned or subpoenaed, to cite the need to protect anonymous sources.

Some people questioned in the case say they have also declined to sign agreements that they will not disclose any information about their encounters with investigators.


Boiled down ,these two paragraphs say they are actively obstructing justice, supposedly against WH orders but we know they say one thing and do just the opposite.


And then there's this little piece of dishonesty:

Disclosure of an undercover officer's identity can be a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. "...just beneath the surface."
Which of course means the resistance is coming from ABOVE. Not "beneath".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Good point!
And how many scandals will be revealed in the months and years to come?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Can you even imagine...
...the flood of books that is going to come out as soon as these pricks are out of office? There has got to be a bunch of people sitting on loads of info that they are dying to share but don't feel able to in the current environment. I expect to be doing LOTS of reading after 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good! Those Freeper Busheviks can dish it out, let's see if they
can take it.

Answer: No WAY those gutless wussies can without cryin' to Mama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. They Had Better Be Anxious
Mr. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor conducting this inquiry, has shown every sign over the last several years in Illinois of being of skilled and vicious animal....

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. What Goes Around Comes Around
What happened to the old "If you've got nothing to hide, why worry about the investigation?" line?

People are hiring lawyers and worrying about what colleagues may or may not be saying. Then, they're OBVIOUSLY HIDING SOMETHING!

These people believe in that line at the top, and yet they're cowering in the dark over being questioned. If they believe the first paragraph, the only logical explanation is that they did do something wrong.

Got 'em.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. "The case has heated up since December"
The case has heated up since December, when Attorney General John Ashcroft removed himself from it and the Justice Department put the matter in the hands of Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago. Soon afterward, some administration officials were summoned to interviews at an office building a few blocks from the White House that is customarily used for investigations of national security breaches.

I have this image of a pack of rats in the basement, scurrying for cover when a light is turned on. dw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. "The mood is concern, not worry," said one Republican
with close ties to the White House." - What's the difference between? If you're 'concerned' or you're 'worried'?? Or you're uptight - you're nervous - you're unsettled - you're ill at ease - you're perturbed.

I bet Robert Novak is all shook up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Excellent. These bastards should never have another good night's sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Anxious? They should be flippin' relieved
that the CIA didn't decide to take care of this matter themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. They must be getting close to naming the scapegoat.
The aide's are anxious about who'll be asked to take the bullet for Dubya and Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
33. "At a White House that has largely avoided scandal "
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 10:08 PM by Stephanie
What are they TALKING about? Don't they follow the news? Maybe these writers don't consider bringing the nation to war on false pretenses scandalous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC