Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Moves to Protect Key Appointees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:49 PM
Original message
Administration Moves to Protect Key Appointees
Source: Washington Post

Just weeks before leaving office, the Interior Department's top lawyer has shifted half a dozen key deputies -- including two former political appointees who have been involved in controversial environmental decisions -- into senior civil service posts.

The transfer of political appointees into permanent federal positions, called "burrowing" by career officials, creates federal sinecures for those employees, and at least initially will deprive the incoming Obama administration of the chance to install its preferred appointees in some key jobs.

Similar efforts are taking place at other agencies. Two political hires at the Labor Department have already secured career posts there, and one at the Department of Housing and Urban Development is trying to make the switch.

Between March 1 and Nov. 3, according to the federal Office of Personnel Management, the Bush administration allowed 20 political appointees to become career civil servants. Six political appointees to the Senior Executive Service, the government's most prestigious and highly paid employees, have received approval to take career jobs at the same level. Fourteen other political, or "Schedule C," appointees have also been approved to take career jobs. One was turned down by OPM and two were withdrawn by the submitting agency.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/17/AR2008111703537.html?hpid=topnews



More Scorched Earth - Bush leaving nothing of value behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which is why we need the president to take office after the election.
Not after the bodies are buried. Two minutes after results are certified, change the locks on the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. that wouldn't stop this, they'd just do it sooner. Right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not if they thought one of theirs was coming in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. in other countries they do.
I wish they would do it in the US, get those criminals out of the WH now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. just move them to a nearly empty office and take away all their duties - pay em 2 do nothing nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. THIS is the IMPORTANT stuff that needs to be taken care of in the first 100 days
ferret these bastards out....in the lower levels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. NOW this is bullshit. Federal employees have it set up so if they'r in the
right positions, they can't be gotten rid of? Not if they promote actions and policies that run totally counter to what the new administration wants?

Wow. Where can I get a deal like that? Or do I simply misunderstand the situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, the Bushies fired career Justice Department Lawyers, so,
I'm thinking there is a way. However, I don't believe "permanent" jobs with the federal government should be granted to people leaving one administration unless approved of by the new administration. There should be a law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksimons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. just give them assignments that they are unwilling to follow

and fire them when they don't do their jobs.

"bye bye"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Managing toxic waste dumps, on site, seems appropriate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. unfortunately, Bush wasn't the first to do this
if you read the article, some 47 Clinton appointees did the same thing

just more of the same old same old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. You beat me to it (that Clinton did this as well)
Same as pardons which you know will start coming out soon as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps they'll fit in nicely with these guys:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Hedley Bowes Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. ITMFA!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. The stink of Rove is palpable.
Damn, this sucks big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. Rove had former Civil Service positions made into non-career SES and Schedule C
to get his desired people in and now he is converting them back? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Guess he feels no need to be consistent. But, who said this is Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. From what I have read over the years
Rove, as Shrub's Senior advisor, was one of the ones who not only helped to compile a list of senior appointees, but also put together the recommendation lists for what I term "sub-appointees" - those below the ones that the President directly appoints. I.e., the Department and agency heads have layers of staff that they can appoint without need for Senate confirmation. These are the Schedule C (where the higher ones are non-career SES).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Give them all assignments in Alaska
studying the mating habbits of bears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. They can be moved. The state of The Presidency as left to Obama BY B*SH
means that their job can be defined by the Administration to the extent that their actual duties can be shifted to things that would be able to do less damage (and probably get them to quit).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Yep. A friend of mine had that happen to her.
She was working for the Office of the Solicitor in the Interior Department. When she made some moves that pissed off the Nixon Administration, they stripped her of most of her authority and moved her into a windowless basement office in an auxiliary building. But they couldn't fire her, and she was too pissed off to quit.

Curiously enough, when Bush took over one of the very first things they did was move the entire Bureau of Indian Affairs out of the main Interior building and across the street to the very same crappy old building. Now the Office of Federal Acknowledgment--the whole lot of 'em--is crammed into "the dungeon."

But the Indians haven't quit or gone away, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
investintrains Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. it was the Bush regime which sued California about electric cars
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 09:00 AM by investintrains
it was the Bush regime which sued California about electric cars
and forced their dismantling
.. and then 1st unelected Bush's VP Quayle bought Chrysler for
private equity Cerberus

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. This needs a
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC