Leahy Becomes First Senator To Demand Lieberman's Ouster From Homeland Security Committee

[Idealism]

Source: TalkingPointsMemo

We now have our first Dem Senator who has come on the record and called for Joe Lieberman to be booted from his plum spot on the Homeland Security committee.

In an interview with Vermont Public Radio today, Senator Patrick Leahy left no doubt whatsoever: He believes Lieberman should be given the push.

"Every Senator will have to vote the way he or she believes they should," Leahy said, in a reference to the upcoming vote on Lieberman's fate in the Dem caucus next week. "I'm one who does not feel that somebody should be rewarded with a major chairmanship after doing what he did."

"I felt some of the attacks that he was involved in against Senator Obama...went way beyond the pale," Leahy continued. "I thought they were not fair, I thought they were not legitimate, I thought they perpetuated some of these horrible myths that were being run about Senator Obama."



Read more: http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/leahy_calls_on_lieberman_to_be.php

---

EDIT: There is an audio clip on TPM websites about his exact comments on Liebermann

[BR_Parkway]

1. Yay for spineage!!

[beac]

61. Yay indeed! I sent Leahy a THANK YOU email and will also call his office Monday.

Leahy's contact info:

email webform: http://leahy.senate.gov/contact.cfm

snail mail: 433 Russell Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

phone: [phone]


Let's hope he's the first of many!

[peace frog]

2. Bravo, Senator Leahy

Not that it changes anything, but THANK YOU for doing the right thing.

[Lucky 13]

3. I'm so proud of my Senator.

He really represents me well. Couldn't be happier with the Vermont delegation.

[Idealism]

4. I am very jealous of your delegation,

here in Florida we can't get anything related to democracy right :(

[Lucky 13]

5. Well, you got Wexler...

He's pretty great!

[Maat]

47. You have the best two.

Sen. Boxer is great; Feinie is not so great. She needs to go the way of Lieberman.

[cali]

48. We do have a good delegation

not a bad apple out of the three.

[lovuian]

6. Bush kiss did it for me

He is a traitor

[krispos42]

15. Bush kiss?

Yeah, it looks like Bush is licked Holy Joe's toes... from the inside...

[GinaMaria]

27. that is disturbing footage! eom

[Idealism]

44. dear god man, my eyes!

i didn't deserve that :(

[proReality]

45. I think Bush was whispering that LIEberman is now a made man.

They both need to go as quickly as possible. Sooner would be better than later!

[Omegaman]

92. looks more like Judas...

kissing Christ before he was taken away to be crucified.  No
honor among thieves it looks like. 

[democracy1st]

7. Now that's change I can believe in !

[aquart]

8. Go Leahy!

[Phred42]

9. Go PAT!

:toast:

[eowyn_of_rohan]

10. We need about 30 more like him

in fact, we deserve it

[AspenRose]

14. +1

:applause:

[bdamomma]

11. thank you Senator Leahy.

you take no BS.

[Zorra]

12. Lieberman is a proven traitor. That makes him a serious threat to our National Security.

Lieberman should not only be barred from the Homeland Security Committee, but from any other Committee that is significantly involved with National Security issues. He's double-minded, bitter and vindictive, and he may deliberately cause us serious harm.

Seriously: Do you trust Joe Lieberman to have knowledge of sensitive National Security issues?

I sure don't.

[Webster Green]

103. He is a fucking traitor!

He's an agent of the brutal fucking shit-hole known as Israel.

He couldn't care less about this country. And if that wasn't bad enough, he likes to lick on the fucking chimp all the time.

What a dick! :thumbsdown:

[jerryster]

123. Excuse me??

Israel... brutal fucking shit hole? Jeez, maybe Lieberman will do us all a favor and leave for some remote deserted island... and take you with him.

[Webster Green]

125. Fuck you, asshole!

I guess I know a brutal fucking shit hole when I see one. :thumbsdown:

[RayStar]

117. Kick Joe Out

I am so angry at JL. I hope they demand he resign ASAP!

[Dover]

13. Would that be a way of saying they don't want the AIPAC governing Homeland Security?

I don't know....but a thought.

[diane in sf]

16. Just called Feinstein and Boxer to request they boot him off Homeland Security

[unblock]

17. to me, lieberman's betrayal is particularly offensive because he accepted the 2000 vp nomination

it's not just that no democrat, or democratic senator, or democratic committee chair, should campaign against the democratic presidential nominee.

i think that anyone who has previously accepted the presidential or vice-presidential nomination has a special obligation to the party that nominated them. the entire party united an supported lieberman in 2000, withholding any particular issues with the candidate in particular, in the name of the party.

he benefitted from the party; then, when it was lieberman's turn to return the favor, he bolts for the other party.

not cool.

[The Blue Flower]

34. Excellent point

Thanks for bringing that up.

[okieinpain]

18. thank you god. n/t.

[DeadManInc]

19. It's about time someone grew a pair!

[JerseygirlCT]

20. Good for Leahy.

As others have said, it's less about punishment and more about suitability for the role. He's pretty aptly demonstrated his lack of the latter.

[Window]

21. Yea for Senator Leahy!

[frylock]

22. knr

nice to see somebody actually put that out there.

[New Mexico]

23. Joe Lieberman

I think Sen. Lieberman knows it is coming. He can't be surprised, not after what he has done. Maybe he will still caucus with the democrats.

[LiberalLovinLug]

30. What's coming...a pat on the back?

According to his pal Harry he's still a 'great' senator. :puke:

Grow an f'n spine for once Majority "Leader". He's a mole for the Repukes anyways, no big loss.

[Mesteryo]

35. many DUers..

Think practically every Democrat is Republican lite. I have yet to hear anyone say how Lieberman differs from Democrats on Homeland Security policy.

Committee chairmanship shouldn't be removed because of revenge for not supporting Obama.

[ZeitGuy]

46. It wasn't about Lieberman "not supporting" Obama.

It's about him perpetuating the lies and myths propogated by those inbred, bottom-feeding mouth-breathers in the McCain/Palin camp, and about him not saying jack when Caribou Barbie was stirring up the seething racism in the GOP base just for shits and giggles. It's about turning his back on his caucus and on the party who nominated him as its VP pick in 2000. It's about piss-poor judgement, and his endless and exasperating display of the same.

I could continue.

[Justess]

121. Well said, ZeitGuy....

And, let's not forget that, at least in my own opinion, it's also about his showing such contempt for the will of the voters when he lost the primary, as a Dem, to Ned Lamont. The voters made their choice, but Lieberman refused to accept *their* choice. Feeling such a sense of entitlement to his seat that he thumbed his nose at the voters by, instead of accepting their choice of nominee, choosing to run as an Independent, instead. Since the Republicans had such a lousy candidate, it was through *their* financing and votes that he won reelection. What a snake!

Of course, no one ever said he couldn't become an Independent, for real. But it was just a means to an end for him. Now he's seeing the truth of that, for real, with his chairmanships being threatened. I said long ago that he should just at least be honest about where his true alliances lie - and join the Republican party. He's about as much of an "Independent" as I am.

He's really sunk his own ship with his latest, scummy tactics, though. The Dems don't need a mole, nor a traitor in their midst. He needs to go!

Peace &

Justess

[Tinksrival]

62. OMG!

Have you ever heard Lieberman on Hannity's show?? It's disgusting! He turned his back on his the Democratic party every way possible! Joe is no Democrat and don't you forget it.
Mr. "I'm Independent" Lieberman is on his own!

[Touchdown]

76. Didn't you get your answer to post 29?

How many times does it have to be explained to you before you get it? Or the rest of us get that your not interested in listening?:eyes:

[clear eye]

81. The committee is also in charge of executive branch oversight

It is called the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The reason Lieberman needs to be replaced is his complete dereliction of duty on that front. There is plenty that needs to be rectified regarding previously issued no-bid contracts to FEMA and Dept. of Homeland Security, and the performance of the Federal Reserve, for starters. His counterpart in the House, Rep. Waxman conducted a number of serious investigations into the performance of the Dept. of Homeland Security and the failures of regulation re: Wall St. with the hope of instituting important reforms*, Lieberman has not. It is not a matter of revenge, but of getting someone who shows the inclination to behave with the proactive integrity a Democratic majority will expect from the person with such a crucial oversight position.

*http://oversight.house.gov/investigations.asp?ID=234 and http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/house_oversight_committee_will.php

[redqueen]

112. Welcome to DU.

Hope you're enjoying your stay.

[tekisui]

24. Thank you Senator!

[Catherine Vincent]

25. Great news!

Liebermann's response...."Go F Yourself, Leahy"!

[az chela]

26. Good on you Leahy

[Libertas1776]

28. Way to Go Sen. Leahy

I would expect nothing less from a man who had the chutzpah to stand up to the Joker in TDK. LOL!

[Mesteryo]

29. I'm not sure about this..

I think being on a committee like Homeland Security should be about more than just whether or not you support your party's presidential candidate. The question should be your ability to perform the task. I'd hate to see the running of a national security committee become more about politics than securing the nation. I see little reason Lieberman would oppose a Democratic agenda on Homeland security given that his disagreements are on foreign policy.

I just hope this is based on his ability to chair the committee and not just revenge for not supporting Obama. If most DUers had their way even moderates couldn't chair committees so there's no objectivity here.

Lieberman should only lose chairmanship on committees he can't or won't institute a Democratic agenda on.

[ZeitGuy]

50. He supported the invasion of Iraq, not with any reservation, but with enthusiasm.

He also not only campaigned for McCain/Palin, but also for down-ticket Repugs. He went on the record to say that he was "fearful for this nation" if Democrats won control of the White House, Senate and House. He did nothing to investigate the disastrous handling of Hurricane Katrina. He's done nothing to exercise oversight of the White House, Defense Department or Dept. of Homeland Security.

In fact, given his bootlicking support of that freak Bush and the Repugs, and his criticism of and opposition to Democrats on many of the most important issues that we face, he has shown nothing but contempt for the "Demcratic agenda." There is a substantial risk of this @sshole going completely off the reservation and staging an anti-Obama witch-hunt.

There is no guarantee that, should he retain his chairmanship, that he will side with Democrats--on anything. He should be kicked to the curb, con brio...60-seat veto-proof majority be damned.

Inferior service and treason should not be rewarded. It should be roundly punished and Lieberman needs to be hung in the wind to twist, as an example of what happens when you f#ck your buddies for a percentage.

[clear eye]

85. Well said, but there is also no reason to expect him to reliably

provide the 60th vote for cloture against a filibuster, especially when law the Dems are trying to pass concerns withdrawing from Iraq, even if we let him keep his committee chair. We're hoping that getting a 60 vote Democratic majority to override an Obama veto will not be an issue.

[AndyTiedye]

109. He Has Already As Much as Said He Will Vote With the Repigs on Cloture

He said having 60 Democrats in the Senate is a Bad Thing. We KNOW he will be voting AGAINST us on cloture every time.

[Mesteryo]

119. so all I'm hearing is..

1.) you want him removed as revenge for campaigning for McCain

2.) you want him removed for siding with Bush on certain issues

By the second standard no Democrat who supported the Patriot Act or Iraq war could be on committees.

Nonetheless you keep saying this is about punishment of Lieberman, thus admitting this is about revenge not his ability to be chairman.

[LastLiberal in PalmSprings]

68. The committee also handles Government Oversight

When he was running as an "Independent Democrat" Lieberman promised to vigorously pursue any and all complaints against the Bush administration. He didn't do squat! This is the guy who would be responsible for investigating any and all charges brought against the Obama administration by the Repugs -- and you can count on there being a LOT of charges. Is there any doubt that he'll hold hearing after hearing, keeping the administration tied up in testimony and producing documents.

It's not about revenge. It's about common sense. You have an apple and two men want that apple. One has worked his tail off to support your efforts, the other has stabbed you in the back at every turn. Which one gets the apple?

Leaving Lieberman as chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Oversight would be a major mistake on so many levels. Bye-bye, Joe -- you made your choices, now live with the consequences.

[enpassant]

79. Senator Bernie Sander has also issued a statement

It's a blockbuster:

"To reward Senator Lieberman with a major committee chairmanship would be a slap in the face of millions of Americans who worked
tirelessly for Barack Obama and who want to see real change in our country," Sanders said in a statement.

"Appointing someone to a major post who led the opposition to everything we are fighting for is not 'change we can believe in,'" Sanders continued. "I very much hope that Senator Lieberman stays in the Democratic caucus and is successful in regaining the confidence of those whom he has disappointed. This is not a time, however, in which he should be rewarded with a major committee chairmanship."


"Slap in my face", it's the perfect line to send to those 16 Democratic senators voting on whether oust Lieberman from the judicial chair.

PS Where's the list of their names and when do they vote? Time to write. Wish one of them was in my state.

[clear eye]

82. He's clearly shown exactly that.

See my post #81 above.

[Libertyfirst]

90. Has it occurred to you that foreign policy is related to national security?

With whatever respect is due, even Sarah Palin would recognize that connection. He has chaired the committee for the past two years and has done nothing. Furthermore, the rest of the name of the committee is governmental affairs. He did not choose to investigate one illegal activity of the Bush administration. Does that meet your criteria of lacking the ability to chair the committee. It certainly meets mine.

You sound as if Lieberman merely went on a talk show and endorsed McCain. Do you remember him speaking at the Republican Convention and standing there with McCain and Palin? He embraced McCain's decision to attempt to put Palin one heartbeat from the Presidency. Do you not recall his campaign trips with McCain? His lies about Obama? His lies about a democratic majority? Give me one good reason why any Democrat- conserative, moderate or liberal- should expect Lieberman to be anything other than the self-centered egoist that he has proven himself to be.

And just in case you didn't know, the senate is a political body, not a sunday school. Get the point?

[Mesteryo]

120. think again..

The committee on Homeland security isn't concerned with foreign policy but with securing the Homeland. So Mrs. Palin is the Homeland a foreign nation?

[Richard Steele]

98. If "instituting a Democratic agenda" is the criterion, he should be stripped of all posts.

He CAMPAIGNED FOR McCAIN- what could possibly show more
opposition to instituting a Democratic agenda?


Your CONCERN for DU's objectivity is duly noted. :eyes:

[PittDem]

31. Kudos! The party needs to stand for something! Drop Lieberman!

[katty]

32. Yay!!!

[DU GrovelBot]

33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##

==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our fourth quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

[florida08]

36. I agree

Lieberman should have been doing his job instead of out campaigning for McCain. In Florida we do have a few good men. Congressman Wexler is one and so is Senator Nelson.

[sonias]

37. Thank you Senator Leahy!

We will not accept low expectations of our new administration or Congress. We need to move the people's agenda forward and not protect little fiefdoms. Joe has been his own worst enemy.


:woohoo: for Senator Leahy!


Sonia

[puebloknot]

38. K&R Kudos, Senator Leahy. We are hungry for Dems with spine ...

... who will finally stand for something.

We have long memories. The Dems who cave in the name of congressional collegiality may find themselves in company of some Republicans who are getting their resumes together.

And although I am still basking in the glow of our electing a smart black man for President of the U.S., Mr. Obama is not immune, either, to facing a disillusioned electorate four years hence. Make us proud, Mr. Obama. Govern from the "Right," not the muddled and compromised middle, and not from any extreme.

[n0nesuch]

39. Email Leahy and Thank Him

I just did.

[e-mail]

[Andy823]

40. Now if the rest if congress

Can grow some backbone, maybe he will see that being a jerk doesn't pay! I wrote both my senators today and told them what I think, so now it's in their hands.

[Lena inRI]

41. Please President-Elect Obama, send out a signal. . .

. . .to convey that "I may not hold any grudge BUT, fellow Democratic senators, Lieberman does not deserve A CHAIR . .

TWEAK THE SITUATION, PLEASE!"

Are you hearing us, dear President-Elect Obama???

It will set a definite tone of party control and principles.

Puleeeeeze, Sir!


:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:

[Plucketeer]

42. SPOT ON!

:kick::evilfrown: <-Lieberdunce

[tom_paine]

43. HUZZAH! for Pat Leahy. K & R!

n/t

[Maineman]

49. This is exactly what should be done.

Let us not have two more years like the last two from the Dems.

[Dinger]

51. Way To Go Leahy!

K & R!

[David Zephyr]

52. At least there is one sane and patriotic American Senator left.

Joe Fucking Lieberman spread the lies, fanned the fires to make war with Iraq.

What was the point of electing Obama if Lieberman remains over Homeland Defense in the Senate?

What was the fucking point?

[Incitatus]

53. As much as I would like to see him go

Yes, he did some fucked up things, but if he will do what we tell him to from now on will it be worth keeping him?

If we need him to prevent filibusters, should getting our agenda through be more important than revenge? Should we see how the undecided seats turn out first?

[David Zephyr]

54. We have Snowe and Collins who will not filibuster with the GOP.

And what makes you think for one second Joe would not join their filibuster.

He needs to go.

[Incitatus]

55. That is my only conern. If we can't be filibustered, fuck him.

[Touchdown]

78. He said he was "fearful of a filibuster proof Democratic Majority"

He said that while he was campaigning for Repugs and McSame.

I think we know EXACTLY which side he will take if he's the 60th vote, and it won't be for cloture.

[redqueen]

113. Thank you. This is a no brainer.

He's already made his intentions clear. He won't be supporting any Dem filibusters.

[WillyT]

56. Big Ole K & R !!!

:kick:

[mod mom]

57. Leahy has been fighting for good fight on the Senate Judiciary Committee while

Lieberman has been protecting * on Homeland Security Committee. We need fighters.

[ejbr]

58. I hope he is not alone n/t

[pleah]

59. Gotta K&R this! I want the little

bastard gone, too.

Boot him out, boot him out, waaaaay out! Rah! Rah! Rah!

[Willo]

60. Here's to hoping he is the first of many. nt

[against all enemies]

63. Thank You Senator Leahy.

[hangman86]

64. Finally someone grows a pair!

And by the way, Senator Leahy has two left testicles.

GET IT!

[Danchi]

65. Conundrum

I understand why some Dems what to keep him in the fold, because they probably will need a majority to break a filibuster set forth by the republicans and his vote could be crucial. On the other hand, he's a traitor. He trashed his soon to be boss in the worst way. How do you work with someone who has done that? The Dem's are always going to have to have "eyes on" him 24/7 so I guess the question is: is he worth it? You need a good astrologer or psychic to figure this one out. My position is to find a way to strip him of power, render him valueless to the republicans and than send him on his way. If he tries to run for the Senate as a Republican, run a Bama Ram on him for any Democratic candidate that runs against him.

[ooglymoogly]

71. Lie berman is going to continue doing what he has been doing...

voting with the dems on things that he would vote on anyway no matter where he is and being an obstacle on things that really matter to the dems. The dems are crapping in their hats and all of ours if they think Lie berman is going to all of a sudden become loyal to our side and the US of A ahead of Israel. He has proven exactly where he stands on most issues and he will not change, spending our blood and treasure to prop up a right wing in Israel. He will continue to vote and grandstand with the dems on cosmetic issues all the while trying to undermine us on everything else and that will be the extent of his loyalty. The dems who vote for this jerk are fools in fools clothing.

[Realityhack]

122. No he isn't worth it.

We can find other people to vote with us. And he might anyway to keep his seat next time around. We should kick him out completely.

[Cha]

66. Definetly, Senator Leahy!

I love your mind!:loveya:

[D23MIURG23]

67. If only there were more senators like Leahy.

The people who think Lieberman should keep his homeland security chair blow my mind. De-chairing Lieberman isn't even a risky stance, it just common fucking sense given that Lieberman is going to use his power to stab Obama in the back.

How many more knives do these people need in their backs before they decide to disarm their traitor?

[mattfromnossa]

69. oust him!

good for you Senator Leahy.

[EmeraldCityGrl]

70. This is a perfect example of why I love Leahy.

[davefromqueens]

72. Very Simple

If Lieberman wants to caucus with Democrats, then he has to play by certain rules.

He can be chair of a meaningless subcommittee where enough Democrats can overrule him if he sides with the republicans.

[unkachuck]

73. thank you Senator Leahy, you are an honorable man....n/t

[Hotler]

74. Senator Leahy, now that you some momentum

how about calling out, and pointing out, and calling for imprisonment of the crooks behind this banking bailout scam.

[enpassant]

75. Lieberman holds no cards

Why can't the Democrats see this? Switching openly to Republican almost surely ends his Senatorial career. It's too risky to caucus with the Republicans and expect to win in New England and switching parties almost certainly kills his chances.

Vote him off this judicial committee where he is not aligned with the Democrats and where he is not aligned with the American public which voted overwhelmingly for change. He represents "more of the same" on this committee.

Offer him some other chairmanship in some other area where he is aligned with the Democrats. It's the pragmatic thing to do, it's a friggin no-brainer. Joe may not be happy about it, he might even turn it down (doubtful, remember he holds no cards) but at least, in the spirit of bipartisanship and forgiveness, the Democrats bent over backwards trying to reach across the aisle by offering him another chair.

Damn this is easy. Why are the Democrats so weak?

[Sarah Ibarruri]

77. I hope they kick him out. Time for him to become Republican.

He's been a Republican too long.

[penndragon69]

80. May all the Libercrates

burn in republican obscurity!

[Jack_Dawson]

83. I'm Torn

Yes, Lieberman is a traitorous asshole. Yes, he's a regular on Hannity and every other thing I despise. But what will booting him accomplish other than firing up our base (DU) and flipping his vote to the other side? Personally I hate the motherfucker but I don't really get how we're going to have 60 votes to actually accomplish something unless we keep our enemies close. Someone educate me.

:beer:

[clear eye]

86. See my posts #'s 81 and 85 above

And thanks for keeping an open mind.

[orleans]

96. links? n/t

[clear eye]

102. Okay, here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3601453&mesg_id=3602314

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3601453&mesg_id=3602335

[orleans]

126. thanks for the links--here is one for you (not that you need it)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=4443694

rachel had evan bayh on the other night--he said he just wants joe to apologize (kiss, kiss, all will be forgiven. blah!)and if he doesn't behave the dems can remove him from chairmanship once everything gets underway.

the following night she said something about (having been told, read, i forget) that if lieberman opens an investigation on obama and the dems try removing him it might have to go up for a full senate vote which could be filibustered! so, basically, if that asshole starts the session as chair he'll probably get to keep it throughout.

joe must go!

[clear eye]

88. Oh yeah, and there's also my journal entry on the subject

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/clear%20eye/38

[zelta gaisma]

84. I actually had to ask my husband..

if Lieberman was Dem or Rep . He acts like a rep but he ran with Gore so I was totally confused of course the 3 glasses of wine that night had *nothing* to do with it :D

[kmdemqueen]

87. gee some good news

[annabanana]

89. Schumer & Durbin want him off it too. .

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/passingthrough/382698

[truthisfreedom]

91. If lieberman has illegitimately attacked Obama, he's not fit to be in Homeland Security.

He's a risk.

[russ1943]

93. It's not holding a grudge,

Removing Lieberman from his chair position (and I would add preventing him from assuming any other chair) isn’t holding a grudge, vindictiveness or vengeance but appropriate.

There’s a difference.

This is a leadership issue.

PE Obama can go on record as requesting and supporting Lieberman remaining in Democratic caucus and saying nothing else.

A committee chair in the US Senate has too much power, influence and resources. He’s not being investigated, censured or kicked out of the Senate or even off of those (3 that I know of) committees. He’s still an elected Senator who has turned his back on the Democratic party, won office as an Independent and campaigned for the Republican candidate and said some less than kind things about our President elect.
Lieberman has made his decisions, taken his actions and can continue to do so.

[razors edge]

94. Pat don't take much shit, now do he.

I truly hope he can somehow get Chaney before him in sworn testimony.

Priceless.

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

95. kicked heck yeh! Lieb doesn't want Dems to have fillibuster proof Maj

Lieberman commmitted an act of betrayal.

[jeff30997]

97. Yes !

It's payback time Benedict.Give this weasel the kick in the butt he deserves!

[Zambero]

99. 'Nuff said. Now show Traitor Joe the door!

He stabbed Obama in the back, and added insult to injury by campaigning against our downticket candidates on the campaign trail. And now he wants his knife back. What possible benefit is Lieberman to the Democratic party? Forget about the value of having 60 seats if Lieberman is counted as one of them. He cannot and should not be trusted or relied on. Excise this cancer, NOW!

[IndianaGreen]

100. Bernie Sanders is calling for Lieberman losing the Chair

Sanders is a socialist but he caucuses with the Democrats.

Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said he hopes Lieberman will remain in the party caucus and work to regain the trust of those he has disappointed.

"To reward Senator Lieberman with a major committee chairmanship would be a slap in the face of millions of Americans who worked tirelessly for Barack Obama and who want to see real change in our country," Sanders said in a statement. "Appointing someone to a major post who led the opposition to everything we are fighting for is not 'change we can believe in.'"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/14/leahy-first-dem-senator-o_n_143912.html

[jerryster]

124. Check out reply 103.

I suggested that Lieberman leave the country and take this guy with him.

[John Q. Citizen]

101. Vermonts Senators get it!

[democrank]

104. Thank you, Senator Leahy.

Lieberman should suffer the consequences of his despicable actions and if he decides to slither to the other side, good riddance.

[KaryninMiami]

105. Thank goodness. Lieberman should be gone- enough is enough. nt

[DrZeeLit]

106. Hooray for my Senators! Leahy and Sanders! Vermont rocks!

I love my state.
I can only hope that when (and I don't want him to) Leahy retires, HOWARD DEAN steps up to the plate!

What a great place to live, with awesome representation!

(and everyone keeps asking why we have a Repub governor -- because a very strong independent keeps running along with a strong Dem and the votes are split -- nobody seems to want to explain on t.v. -- but that's the problem here... hope somebody works on it ... soon)

[cali]

108. Gaye Symington a strong dem? NOT. She ran a for shit campaign

and anyway Douglas won with 56% of the vote in a 3 way race. People here like Governor Milquetoast. Not sure why, but there it is.

[DrZeeLit]

116. You're right. I was being kind to say Ms S was 'strong' and I do NOT for the life of me understand

understand anyone voting for The Governor Who Isn't

I don't have t.v. and I only listen to VPR, so I missed all the ads and such.
I heard Symington on VPR. She's always seemed OK.
I heard the Gov touting "privatization of Social Security" and I about fell off my couch.
What a boob. Oh well, the best I can say is... he doesn't do anything, so perhaps that will work for us?

Anyway... hoorah for the best 3 votes in the US Congress!!!

[Vidar]

107. I propose a 21 gun salute to Mr. Leahy fired directly into Lieberman's fat ass.

[goforit]

110. Put him incharge of licking envelopes for a job well done!!!

[redqueen]

111. Glad I saw this in time to rec it.

Let's hope most Dem Senators agree with Leahy.

[Hepburn]

114. YES, YES, YES!!!!! Let's hear it for Pat Leahy!!!!!`

Bravo....:applause:

K&R for Sen. Leahy!!! :hi:

[go west young man]

115. Joe must go!

[happygoluckytoyou]

118. May the Lord bless and keep Liarman... FAR AWAY FROM US !