Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MN Secretary of State: (Senator) Coleman's goal 'to win at any price'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:52 PM
Original message
MN Secretary of State: (Senator) Coleman's goal 'to win at any price'
Source: Politico

The Democratic Secretary of State of Minnesota, Mark Ritchie, was just on MSNBC talking about the recount in the Minnesota Senate race between Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) and Democrat Al Franken, and his comments will likely upset Coleman's campaign.

Asked about the Coleman campaign's criticism of the recanvassing process, Ritchie said: “Their goal is to win at any price, they’ve invested millions and millions of dollars. We consider this part of the normal political rhetoric,” said Ritchie. “We're used to the political rhetoric being amped up. That’s part of their job – to win at any price.”

Since last Wednesday, Coleman's lead has shrunk as county officials have recanvassed their election totals and corrected errors that have benefited Franken.

National Republicans have accused Ritchie, the man tasked with overseeing the recount, of being an unabashed partisan. A background document distributed by national Republicans portrays Ritchie as a far-left, Democratic version of Katherine Harris, the former Republican secretary of state whose actions helped decide the 2000 presidential election.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1108/MN_Secretary_of_state_Colemans_goal_to_win_at_any_price.html?showall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems like a non-partisan statement to me. He would probably
say the same thing about Al Franken. Ritchie doesn't say he's offended by each candidates position. In fact, his statement: “Their goal is to win at any price, they’ve invested millions and millions of dollars." doesn't limit itself to just Coleman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ritchie fully understands how the election was stolen in 2000
and he is where he is because he does not want to see democracy side-stepped again. His presentation when running for office was impressive. Minnesota is in good hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That said, aren't hand ballots in Minnesota electronically counted?
The state was rigged electronically and that's why we're in this mess. I am not hopeful that Franken can pull it out. The state has a GOP governor, big problem. It's elephants run amok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yes, but hand inspection is called for when there is a recount
and there you look for the intent of the voter. So, if I put an X on a ballot where I should have bubbled Franken that would not register on the machine but would be recorded by hand as a vote for Al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. .....being an unabashed partisan
.....says the party that stole two Presidential elections by controlling the Secretary of State office in both Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. whose CAMPAIGN CHAIRS ran the Sec of State office in both states!
We got your "partisan" crap here, asswipes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. National Republicans portray Ritchie as a liber version of Katherine Harris eh
so would that mean this will even the score a bit? Last I checked even if he was influencing a senate race, its a far cry from being the steward of the free world. Its still not even close, even if Ritchie was doing something unscrupulous (which i don't think he is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. they were okay
with that kind of partisanship when it tipped the odds their way. boo fucking hoo now. with your dirty tricks and your election fraud and your corrupt contributors. eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. So they're admitting Katherine Harris stole Florida for Bush?
Ask them to provide documentary evidence so we can proceed with prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fjc Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Precisely, and they don't even seem to realize they're admitting it.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 01:18 PM by fjc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even if that were true (the left wing partisan crap), I say to ALL........
........you Republicans nationwide that NEVER said a god damn thing about "junior" thru his 8 yrs of political rape and bullshit, FUCK YOU AND YOUR TOOTHY FUCKING ROBOT COLEMAN!!!!!! And just for good measure: KISS MY FUCKING LIBERAL ASS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. CREEP
the updated version: Committee to Re-elect the Putz :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. How interesting that they consider this guy in the same vein as Harris
They KNOW what Harris did and they fear that from someone on the opposition side.

Call a Wambulance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Democratic version of Katherine Harris
So they're accusing him of purging voter rolls? I thought he was actually following the law and making sure votes were counted properly. How could I have been so wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. "National Republicans have accused Ritchie
of being an unabashed partisan.


Funny, I don't remember them complaining about that in Florida in 2000 or Ohio in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. FUNNY... the more they count... the better Franken gets... damn vote counting!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. A democratic version of Katherine Harris?
I didn't know Mark had implants!

But does the Coleman campaign have any actual instances of failure to follow the law? There were dozens of allegations of wrong-doing against Harris and the Florida vote-counting apparatus, all of which were swept away with a stroke of Fat Tony's Supreme Pen. Does Coleman have any, you know, evidence? Or is his campaign just throwing every piece of dried, crusty crap it can get its hands on to see if any of it sticks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rdmtimp Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. You beat me to it!
I was going to ask what his equivalents of Moxie and Spunk are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. "democratic" and "katherine harris" don't belong in the same fucking sentence!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Once again, the "errors" seem to be against the Democrat. sure, they are correcting them now that a
recount is mandatory. However, I stiil wonder why so many errors that disadvantaged franken were made, while few, if any, disadvantaged Coleman. Coleman is complaining about the correcting of the errots, but that takes attention away from the bigger issue. Why so many errors disadvantaging only one side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Everyone in MN should check the trunks of their cars!
Every vote should be counted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
21. In Minnesota, officials are allowed to consider voter intent
At least according to what I've read. Coleman can whine and cry all he wants, but he doesn't have a fucking chance. Obama won Minnesota, therefore Franken should be the winner as well. As soon as they do the recount, I have full faith that they'll find enough votes to put him over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. If they are accusing Ritchie of being a far left version of Katherine Harris
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 02:39 AM by socialdemocrat1981
Then they are acknowledging that Katherine Harris was biased, partisan and didn't do her job fairly.

Two-faced, lousy, sleazy hypocrites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC