Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's loss of flying status should have spurred probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:07 AM
Original message
Bush's loss of flying status should have spurred probe
Bush's loss of flying status should have spurred probe


By Walter V. Robinson and Francie Latour, Globe Staff, 2/12/2004
President Bush's August 1972 suspension from flight status in the Texas Air National Guard -- triggered by his failure to take a required annual flight physical -- should have prompted an investigation by his commander, a written acknowledgement by Bush, and perhaps a written report to senior Air Force officials, according to Air Force regulations in effect at the time.



Bush, who was a fighter-interceptor pilot assigned to the Texas Air National Guard, last flew in April 1972 -- just before the missed physical and 30 months before his flight commitment ended. He also did not attend National Guard training for several months that year and was permitted to cut short his military commitment a year later in 1973.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan, for the second day in a row, refused yesterday to answer questions about Bush's failure to take the physical and appeared to retreat from Bush's promise Sunday to make public all of his military records. Asked at a midday press briefing if all of Bush's records would be released, McClellan said, "We'd have to see if there is any new information in that."

More: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/02/12/bushs_loss_of_flying_status_should_have_spurred_probe/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. How much did it cost to train him?
I'm sure all the records exist to answer this question. (Including the price of Poppy's trip to pin medals on the little tyke.)

This may be seen as payback for Clinton, but we have finally succeeded in playing by their rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I read in an earlier article that it cost $1million to train him
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. And that was a million dollars when a brand new Cadillac cost 3000 bucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POed_Ex_Repub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. This would be the perfect time for a CIA leak wouldn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. LOL, I like the way you think
Indeed it would, and well earned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXDemGal Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Walter Robinson's on the case
again. Do we know for a fact that a mandatory drug testing requirement had been added to flight physicals right around the time Smirk failed to complete his? Just wondering....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Random drug testing was introduced by the Pentagon in April 1972,
and Bush missed his medical in August that year. So....could've
been the reason. Or one of the reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. He didn't want to risk being tested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick!
There is a LOT of things about chimp's past that SHOULD have been probed but instead got buried. I hope ALL of it is revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. bush brought all this on himself with his stunt
on the carrier. The Democrats didn't bring this up - bush created this with his phony "flight suit." Also, another eason for it to come to the forefront is that military are going AWOL and they are being prosecuted for it. There are several stories out about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. I find it very "coincidental"
that * was possibly arrested for cocaine in 1972 - disappeared from his NG duty in 1972 - worked in a community program in Houston in 1972 - and refused a medical exam in 1972.

A probe of those activities might show information on his capabilities to lie, cheat, steal from the taxpayers and in turn show that he is currently incapable of telling the facts about himself and his motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. This has been my question ever since I read FS
4 years ago.

Allegedly Karl Rove is the one that spilled the info about the cocaine conviction to Hatfield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. so where is James R. Bath
now?

Wouldn't he be able to answer some of these questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Check this link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Instead of looking for people in his unit
maybe they should check with criminals in lockup during that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They set the new rules of the game with Clinton....now We are playing
their game and it isn't making the fools happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. You're right! Did you see the McClellan press briefing?
Yesterday, one of the reporters quoted BushI campaign tactics against Clinton to McLellan and asked if he would define that as "trolling for trash". It was a riot!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Didn't McClellan reply with something
lame like "well, that's to be expected right before an election, but we're nine months out now". :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Don't recall exactly, but basically he ignored it
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 01:19 PM by liburl
and just redirected back to the present "trolling for trash". (Forget that past, we don't acknowledge past mistakes type of thing)

edit to add:
Here's what he said:
Q Scott, you used some pretty tough language this morning about those who are saying that the President has not answered all of the questions about the National Guard. You accused them of gutter politics and trolling for trash. As you know, back in the '92 campaign, then Governor Clinton's Vietnam-era history came up. And near the end of the campaign, then President Bush, this President's father, in a speech used the words "Slick Willie," talking about Governor Clinton then, and talked about the controversy, that the Governor had promised to release all his draft records, but had not. And he said, "He ought to level with the American people on the draft." He referred again to the records controversy, and he said, "He ought to level on these kinds of things." Is that trolling for trash?

MR. McCLELLAN: John, we released documents showing that the President fulfilled his duties. Some people are calling on us to release documents. The documents spell out that the President fulfilled his duties. I think that you expect the garbage can to be thrown at you in the 11th hour of a campaign, but not nine months before election day. And I certainly hope that this level of discourse is not a reflection of what the American people can expect from the Democratic Party over the duration of the campaign. :puke:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/02/20040211-3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. That was the one!
Pot, meet kettle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. 30-odd years is a long time ...
... i.e., plenty of time for a drug addict (or pusher) to have OD'd,
for a drinking partner to have died in a DUI crash, or for any other
petty criminal to have been shot resisting arrest/in a feud/drive-by.

It's even long enough for a fellow pilot to have had a training
accident (or a reminder that these things can happen to all sorts of
good people and their families if their memory is too good).

Of course, this can easily be explained by statistics and coincidence.
So can the deaths of the members of units involved with the Jessica
Lynch operation. And the microbiologists. And the Raytheon people.
And the investigative reporters. And ...

Nihil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. or court employees who may have been aware
dammit we need the Maine DWI guy again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Interesting ... I hadn't thought of that
It's easier to prove where someone was , rather than
where they weren't .

I think looking into Jails and such would be a great
place to start .

Also in 2002 bush was in Alaska on his way to Asia
when he said he lived in alaska for a period of time .
When was he living in Alaska was it during the time in question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. The Alaska story
State GOP delegates cast votes for Bush
Alaska's delegation to the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia has cast its votes for Texas Governor George Bush to be the party's presidential nominee. Bush needs 1,034 delegates to secure the Republican presidential nomination. For the first time, the ceremonial roll call is being spread out over several nights. The chair of the Alaska delegation, Reverend Jerry Prevo, announced to the convention last night that Alaska was unanimously casting its 23 votes -- "for the first president who lived in Alaska, the next president of the United States, George W. Bush." Bush lived in Alaska briefly in 1974 while working for an airline in Fairbanks.

http://tinyurl.com/24ugo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Would there be anything in the newspapers at that time for drug arrests?
Or any type of arrest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Georgie "lost interest in flying"
snip>

Weaver said it is entirely possible that Killian -- who, according to Bush's biography was also a friend -- concluded that Bush had lost interest in flying, at a time when Weaver said there were numerous active duty pilots with combat experience eager to get flying billets in Guard units.

Weaver, after looking over Bush's light duty load between May 1972 and May 1973, said he doubted that Bush would have been proficient enough to return to the F-102 cockpit. "I would not have let him near the airplane," Weaver said. If there was evidence that Bush's interest in the Guard had waned, Weaver said, then it would have been acceptable for Bush's commanders to "cut their losses" and grant him an early release rather than retain a guard pilot who could no longer fly.

snip>

I wonder how many of our military in Iraq have "lost interest" by this time.

Great article. This is the issue that cannot be fudged with dental records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. Great!!!!!!........let's nail
this lying SOB. George.......you lied and people died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Problem is that Bush flew the F-102 which was already obsolete
Pilots may lose their flight status when there are not enough cockpits to go around, and are assigned to administrative duties.

The question is: what administrative duties did Bush get after he lost his flight status?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. F-102 was apparently retired over seas
It was still in service for protecting the US airspace in at least through '72, from what I read about the crazy '72 hijacking and his AWOL defender Campenni yesterday:

http://tinyurl.com/2g3ov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:18 PM
Original message
We're not allowed to ask the questions
They'll give us the answers to the questions that we're SUPPOSE to be asking.

Get with the program

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamademo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. See this link
...for an idea of what he was doing in Alabama.

http://www.southerner.net/blog/awolbush.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Excellent!
It appears the roof is caving in on junior and the crime cabal he fronts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. But, but.....
You mean Bush wasn`t really a hero pilot, he just played one on TV?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. One thing I've wondered does "Failed to achieve" mean
that * didn't

A. Take his physical

B. Pass his physical

C. Was high on coke DURING his physical


??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC