Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP says Iraq intelligence failure caused by Clinton budget cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:48 PM
Original message
GOP says Iraq intelligence failure caused by Clinton budget cuts
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/11/national1613EST0753.DTL

In a sign of how Republicans may try to quell criticism of prewar intelligence in Iraq, the head of the House Intelligence Committee tried Wednesday to direct the blame back to the Clinton administration.
Rep. Porter J. Goss of Florida said he heard a 1998 speech in which then-President Clinton warned something must be done about Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction.
"Unfortunately, he did not complete that task before his term expired," Goss said in a Capitol Hill press conference.
He said the Clinton administration gutted intelligence assets in the 1990s, so the U.S. intelligence community could not do any better a job than it has done recently.




Hello…Hello…media…are ya out there…try getting it right for a change…this ain’t no stinkin’ signal of things to come from the party of no responsibility…..it’s been the status quo from day one*****it’s Clinton’s fault****simply amazing how the buck keeps getting passed by these pukes…

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hold the phone
Let's see, they have been in control for the last 3 plus years, and they are still blaming Clinton...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. They'll stop blaming Clinton when the Nazis stop blaming the Jews
Not a minute before.

Totalitarian Scumbags think alike...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. They'll Blame Carter next
Or maybe Truman?

They are grasping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. seems he might not have had the extra time
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 04:54 PM by pacifictiger
to lobby the republican congressional purse string holders. Why?
Maybe he was distracted by legal issues pertaining to his private sex life.
Edit: And besides Bush took over that intelligence responsibilty 1/01 - war was not initiated for another TWO years - 3/03. He must think everyone is as stupid as he appears to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who had control over the purse strings?
Probably a Republican budget - right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:53 PM
Original message
Desperate move, doomed to backfire
I'm really starting to think that Barad Dur is crumbling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerouac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. Same thugs that called Clinton/Gore paranoid.
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 05:43 PM by kerouac

Am I the only one that remembers Al Gore's "Gore Commission" and the push by Clinton/Gore to increase funding for anti-terrorism and airline security by something like a billion dollars?

Trent Lott, Phil Gramm, Don Nickles and their thug friends called Bill and Al "paranoid liberals" that just want to spend more money.

People should be talking about what Gore asked for and said we needed and the people that opposed it under pressure from the airline industry.

We need to pin the label "intelligence failure" on Bush himself.. that should be the heading on ads, flyers and posters this election season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I remember that, too.
I also recall that the budget request Bush made in 2001 CUT counterterrorism spending. I could swear I saw an article in the New York Times about it just around 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Papa Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
57. That's a great Idea about labeling Bush as an Intelligence failure
When I read your post, I thought of a picture of Bush captioned with the words "Intelligence Failure". That's all you would need..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
60. I would be mightily grateful if we could find a link to that,...
,...it would be so very, very helpful to me as counter-ammo 'cause I hear the "it's Clinton's fault" all the freakin' time. Don't get me wrong, I hold Clinton responsible for his actions,...but, I have to be particularly assertive in imposing responsibility on extremists who are constantly thwarting or projecting the leadership's responsibility on everybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Umm didn't Bill double the budget and triple the # working on counterintel
Something like that.

This is, dare I say, gutter politics.....trolling for trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. ABC (Always Blame Clinton) What *Assholes
Who ran the House of Representatives for 6 of the 8 years while Clinton was President.

The only plausible argument to let Bush and the GOP control the Federal Government for four more years is so they f*ck it so totally up that there is noo way they can ever blame Clinton or Democrats in general for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChompySnack Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Isn't he the one...
Wasn't it Porter Goss the one that met with the Pakistani intelligence chief the morning of 9/11? The very same intelligence chief that was reported to have bankrolled Mohammed Atta? Isn't he also in some way in charge of investigating 9/11?

The US government corruption has metastasized and is now fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
47. omigod...clinton flew bot h planes into wtc!!!
i thought so!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. But wasn't it the Clinton admin that warned the junta about Osama? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, only $30 to $40 billion was left for the intelligence apparatus
after Clinton's gutting. Interestingly, I seem to recall that counterintelligence was not among the AG's top ten budget priorities on 9-10 (with all those whores to round up and that marijuana-for- medical-purposes facility to be closed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's high time the repugs get this thing under control ...
and form the Clenis Regulatory Agency. Something must be done to harness the awesome power of the Clenis.

Repugs will inevitably appeal to the base. But the deluded base is not enough to keep them in power. I smell desperation. The more they squirm and refuse to accept responsibility, the more Americans will view them as weasels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. blatant lie
It was not an intelligence failure - the CIA had it right, but Bushco wanted to go to war so they created OSP and cooked the data. It was not an intelligence failure, but a conscious decision to ignore intelligence that didn't support their case. They cannot blame Clinton for their misuse of intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. a tinfoil hat string of excuses piles up and up and up....and half of them
contradict the other half. I agree, the primary event was ignored or manipulated intelligence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're starting to get really desperate now! What crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, if Clinton just hadn't beaten the pants off Daddy Bush
and broken the chain of command, we'd already have had the New World Disorder. Clinton messed it allllllllll up. It's ALL his fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Bush #41 HAD to toss the election or else he would have gone to JAIL for
his role in Iran Contra.

If you look closely at how the case was coming to a postuled head, the bush regime would have been COMPLETELY derailed had bush not been able to pardon the iran contra 7 and literally take the iran contra hearings off the able.

He was forced to toss that election... he didn't even campaign. Luckily we got Bill Clinton, which was indeed very fortuitious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. this trial balloon will backfire....
the buck doesn't stop with Bill Clinton, not now and not for the last three years, it stops with Busboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. More rope, please! Keep giving em rope.
What is going on this past week is truly beyond my wildest dreams. I never thought the Bushbots would implode like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. But the Intel came from DONALD RUMSFELD in his 1998 Security Commission
Report...

And from the PNAC.

So did don not get paid to be on that commission?

Did the PNAC run out of ink when signing their letters BEGGING clinton to invade iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. The President signs bills put to him by Congress
Congress was Republican and put the bills on his desk. If President Clinton signed a bill that cut intelligence it was put before him by Congress and I'm sure it was not a stand alone bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SideshowScott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bwah-ha-ha!!! I was wondering when they would blame Clinton..
But but but I thought Clinton was a Spender..The GOP is really reaching now..Not that they havent been since they have been useing the ABC's..The GOP really is pathetic..They can never take the heat but always want to be in the kitchen..They can never act like a adult and take charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Hahahahahaha, Ha Ha Hahahahahahah! The only first response
to this is to laugh out loud.

Both Powell and Rice are on video tape in early 2001 saying that Saddam's military capacity presented no special concern.

Symbolman or someone will make a lovely 30 sec ad out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snappy Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Office of Special Plans
Investigate that and the answers regarding faulty intell. will be revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. This needs to be reframed. It was not an intelligence failure
The intelligence community is excellent, doing their job. Until the bush admin gets their pea brains involved.

The issue needs to be called "stove piping" or the more common term, "cherry picking" by the Admin, especially Cheney.

"The Admin stovepiped the intelligence"..."Cheney cherry picked the intelligence..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. "Cherry-Picking Cheney Cheated The CIA."
How's THAT for a headline? ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Zhade!!!!!!
I've missed you!!!! You know me from livejournal :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #34
46. HEY! You're on DU - rock on!
Glad to see you here! :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Now....
say that fast 10 times. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yep. It was only a matter of time
How long does Bill Clinton have to be out of office before the Bush Administration is responsible for what happens in government? Three years? Five? Eight? Never?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannygoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. Some good resources to counteract the repukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cayanne Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Hatch, Lott & Gramm
Here is more proof It wasn't President Clinton' fault.

President wants Senate to hurry with new anti-terrorism laws
http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/30/clinton.terrorism/

snip:
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, doubted that the Senate would rush to action before they recess this weekend. The Senate needs to study all the options, he said, and trying to get it done in the next three days would be tough.
One key GOP senator was more critical, calling a proposed study of chemical markers in explosives "a phony issue."
Republican leaders earlier met with White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta for about an hour in response to the president's call for "the very best ideas" for fighting terrorism.
snip:
Hatch called Clinton's proposed study of taggants -- chemical markers in explosives that could help track terrorists -- "a phony issue."
----------------

Real American Traitors
By William Rivers Pitt
http://www.americanpolitics.com/20011004Pittraitors.html


Snip:
The hypocrisy behind current Republican attempts to blame Clinton for the World Trade Center attacks finds its roots far beyond the opportunistic posturing of Phil Gramm. It reaches back to the viciously partisan Republican-controlled Congress of 1996, which thwarted legislation offered by Clinton that would have substantially augmented America's ability to defend against terrorist threats.
In 1996 Senator Orrin Hatch referred to several threats which Clinton warned us of, threats that now are as commonplace as stores that have sold out of gas masks, as "phony threats." He used these words to attack Clinton's legislation, helping to create a legislative environment that gave birth to a watered-down, Congress-driven version of an anti-terrorism bill that has been proven to be utterly worthless.
Senator Trent Lott, with his powers as Republican Majority Leader, did everything in his power to hamstring Clinton's attempt to enact real protections against American threats in 1996. Yet he found within himself the unmitigated gall to stand in the well of the Senate during a debate about the current iteration of Clinton's anti-terrorism measures on October 2nd, 2001 and say, "If anything happens, if there is a terror attack, the Democrats will have to explain to the American people why they didn't pass this bill."

----------------


President Calls on Congress To Pass Airport Security Bill
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V116/N40/airport.40w.html

snip:
"We need all these laws and we need them now, before Congress recesses for the year," Clinton said in an Oval Office meeting where he accepted the airline report from a presidential commission. "Terror-ists don't wait and neither should we."
The spending package is intended to address escalating public concern over American security in the face of several deadly incidents in the last 18 months, from the bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City, to the attack on U.S. forces stationed in Saudi Arabia, to the still-unexplained downing of Trans World Airlines Flight 800 near New York in July. Coming the week after Clinton authorized missile strikes against Iraq, it could also serve to reinforce the president's image as a tough commander-in-chief.
On Capitol Hill, some Republican leaders were skeptical, saying the administration has not even yet taken full advantage of the $1 billion anti-terrorism law he signed in April.
"While Congress will certainly work with the president to provide funding for anti-terrorism efforts," said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, "it is important to note that we have done so already. Š The administration would be wise to utilize the resources Congress has already provided before it requests additional funding."
----------------



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. And the Bush Administration was so worried about how Clinton
destroyed our intelligence and military capabilities that Bush worked as hard as he could to fix it for 28 weeks and then took a one month vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. hahahaha. no, what happened was, they ignored Clinton's serious warnings
about bin laden, f*cked with the taliban, and were complicit in 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. The Republican backed voter wanted those cutbacks -- hypocrites.
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 06:18 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Clinton and the Democratic Congress were in the process of changing the CIA's dependency on expensive heavy satellite technology to a CIA that resorted to human intelligence when the Newt Gingrich Revolution took over. The media helped in that regard by saying the Democratic Congress wasn't cutting enough nor fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
59. Exactly--the Peace Dividend! that's why we "tore down the wall!"
so we could make ploughs instead of tanks. Of course the Republicans couldn't stand that, though, to cut off their Defense Industry Cash Cow that they'd sucked off for 50 years. The Cold War had to be strted up again! So that's why they destroyed Clinton and got us into Iraq. And damn the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBigBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. Something WAS done about the WMD
Clinton bombed Iraq in '98 and, by all accounts, destroyed whatever was left over from pre-91.

Clinton disarmed Iraq. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
37. No amount of money spent on gathering
intelligence matters if one lacks the capacity to digest and
use that information. Didn't Halliburton have a subsidiary
capable doing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. clinton
It has been and always will be the repukes Mantra to lay blame on everyone but themselves "It's his dick. stupid"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. and they voted down increasing airport security
so they can go fuck themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. EXACTAMUNDO!!
A Repub. Congress during President Clinton's term was holding the purse strings and stonewalled any efforts to deal with potential airline terrorism. That is a fact.

The Gore Commission Report on aviation security was dissed by the Repub Congress...some of the same characters who all "Homeland Defense" gung-ho now. Sickening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
42. GOP Blames years of repression by LynneSin's mom for intel failure
I mean, isn't my mother next on the list for the blame game

This is too freaking ridiculous and only make the repukes looker even dumberererererererer!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
43. Uh, The dog ate my homework.
I can't be blamed because I had a bad childhood.

What a crock of horseshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
44. There WAS no intelligence failure. They reported Saddam had no WMD
loud and clear prior to the war. Millions of people have saved it to their hard drive. Will the media still play the GOPs sick little game? This is truly pathetic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
45. why was bush planning funding cuts for antiterrorism in sept 2001?
if rep goss wants to open this bag of worms, let him.

the bush administration was planning to reduce funding for antiterrorism and intelligence gathering just days before sept 11, 2001.

if anyone let his guard down it was bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
48. omigod...clinton flew both planes into wtc!
thought so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
49. Bwwwwwaaaaaaaaa, they're so predictable
I KNEW that was what they were leading up to all along. The repukes need to quit being such whiny crybabies, always blaming some one else.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
50. Obsessed with the Clenis
pretty much spells it out...60-80 million dollar investigation about this Member of Government...totally absorbed by the misdirections of the presidential penis...a whole year wasted on this by the repugs, meanwhile claiming any action Clinton took was "wag the dog"...

All I can say is I'm sickened and disgusted by this Republican bullshit...the Repugs did their best to block anything Clinton did and now they blame him for their own failures the past four years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. They'll blame FDR next
He was too soft on terrorism, </Sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
52. They should read Wm Pitt's essay 'Hell to Pay.' and then go to hell.
Hell To Pay
January 11, 2002
by William Rivers Pitt

"Depend upon it, Sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully." - Samuel Johnson

Some time just before January 7th, 2001, an asteroid capable of pulverizing a good-sized nation flashed through the void, passing perilously close to Earth. Had it struck our planet, the impact would have had global consequences. The energy of the strike would have been equivalent to the explosion of a number of large atomic weapons. From the media perspective, it would have been the biggest story since the extinction of the dinosaurs.

At some point in the next six months, a small, darkened corner of George W. Bush's consciousness will wish the thing had hit us. The apocalypse he and his fundamentalist buddies have been waiting for would have been at hand, and a number of potentially calamitous questions about to be put to his administration would have been avoided.

Sadly for him, the planet spins on. Beneath the unpierced stratosphere, the electronic beams of news agencies like CNN and the Associated Press have begun to spread like a widow's web from city to city and house to house. Carried on this invisible wind are rumors of doom, negligence and greed. Each and every one of these rumors lead inexorably back to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, which will soon be issuing significant numbers of visitor passes to lawyers if the pattern holds much longer.

Whichever part of the nation that never heard of the energy giant Enron Corporation has recently been introduced to the company in odious context. The story thus far is nothing less than astounding: Enron, a company valued in the billions on Wall Street, suddenly filed for the largest bankruptcy claim in the history of the known universe. 4,000 employees were abruptly shown the door after having been barred from dumping the company stock, meant to fund their retirement, while it was worth something. Meanwhile, Enron executives in the know were able to dump the stock, back when it was the gold standard on the Street, for a cool $1 billion.

Apparently, Enron was ailing for quite a long time. The aforementioned executives were able to maintain the mirage of financial viability by stuffing the debt into what are called 'off-balance-sheet partnerships.' In essence, each of the executives built personal banking bunkers and hid what has been revealed to be staggering Enron debts within them, keeping fact that the company was hemorrhaging money off the publicly displayed balance sheets. This maintained the company's credit rating, and allowed it to continue doing business.

This went on for four years, which means several things. It means most of the Enron executives were aware of and/or actively participating in this highly criminal and irresponsible activity. It means the stockholders, including 4,000 loyal Enron employees, were lied to. It probably means that the executives knew the stock value was doomed when they bailed out and cashed in several months ago. It means they let their employees lose the retirement funds they believed were growing within their Enron stock portfolios. It means a lot of people got screwed by a pack of sharp operators who didn't give a damn about anyone but themselves.

All this could simply be chalked up as yet another story of corporate greed run amok, until the umbilical political and financial connections between Bush and Enron are illuminated. Enron's capo, Kenneth Lay, was perhaps the best financial friend George W. Bush has ever known. Lay and a number of Enron employees essentially bankrolled Bush's 2000 Presidential campaign, going so far as to lend Bush an Enron corporate jet for trips between whistle stops. Before Bush got White House stars in his eyes, he worked very closely with Enron on energy policy in Texas.

This close connection led to the Bush administration's hiring of a number of influential individuals within Enron's orbit for important government positions:

- Thomas E. White, Bush's Secretary of the Army, was once Vice-Chairman of Enron Energy Service, and held millions in Enron stock;

- Presidential Advisor Karl Rove owned as much as $250,000 in Enron stock;

- Economic adviser Larry Lindsay leapt straight from Enron to his current White House job;

- Federal Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick did the same;

- SEC Chairman Harvey Pitts was hand-picked by Kenneth Lay for the position, due to his notorious aversion to governmental regulation of any kind.

There are some thirty one Bush administration officials who had a line item for Enron in their stock portfolio, including Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. It is fair to say that the woebegone corporation held, and continues to hold, enormous influence over the day-to-day machinations of Federal government policy. One wonders if Bush's recent gutting of the Clean Air Act, a decision designed to improve the fortunes of companies like Enron, was the brainchild of people with deep connections to the energy industry.

The trail of influence left by Enron leads also to the scabrous heart ventricles of Vice President Dick Cheney, who admitted recently to six separate meetings with Enron executives while formulating the Bush administration's energy policy. Cheney, a former executive of the Halliburton Petroleum interest, was in charge of creating this policy. For reasons soon to be exposed by subpoena, Cheney refused to detail the specifics of the creation of this policy, which included the multiple Enron meetings.

The General Accounting Office was preparing to sue Cheney to reveal this information when the September 11th attacks took place. Those subpoenas may be dusted off and mailed within a month. In the meantime, the Justice Department is preparing a criminal investigation into the collapse of Enron. The Democratically-controlled Senate is planning hearings on the matter as well. Columnist Robert Scheer has referred to the Bush administration's involvement in the Enron debacle as "Whitewater in spades." One wonders if "Watergate" would be a more appropriate comparison.

Bush's own dealings within the energy industry carry a disturbingly familiar echo to the Enron situation: once upon a time, he was a high-ranking officer of a petroleum interest called Harken Oil. On June 22, 1990, Bush sold his Harken stock and made $848,560, earning him a 200% profit. One week later, Harken announced a $23.2 million loss in quarterly earnings and its stock dropped sharply, losing 60 percent of its value over the next six months. Bush made a bundle while the other investors lost millions. Harken was Enron in miniature, and might have served as a warning to the American people if the press had chosen to pay any attention to it during the 2000 Presidential campaign.

There is a school of thought, espoused primarily by Republicans, that any investigation into potentially dishonorable or illegal actions by the Bush administration is tantamount to treason. We are at war, undeclared though it may be, and Bush must be free to prosecute this war vigorously, so as to defend our freedom and bring the murderers of American civilians to justice. If reports recently aired on CNN have any credence, however, Bush and his people may well have to answer for actions that make the Enron catastrophe look like a jaywalking offense, actions that led directly to the incredible carnage in New York and Washington, D.C.

In 1998, during the Clinton administration, the U.S.-based energy concern Unocal canceled plans to exploit massive natural gas deposits in Turkmenistan. They had planned to run a pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan, where the natural gas could have been processed for Asian and Western energy markets. The idea was scuttled after Clinton ordered the cruise missile bombing of Afghanistan in response to a terrorist attack upon U.S. embassies in Africa which were planned and executed by Osama bin Laden. The pipeline would have had to pass through Afghanistan, and Unocal was given the message in Technicolor by Clinton's people that Taliban-controlled Afghanistan was not to be given any sort of financial boon.

Apparently, the Bush administration found no moral dilemma in dealing with the Taliban to get to the gas. Immediately upon their arrival in Washington, a vigorous courtship of the Taliban was undertaken by Bush's people. In fact, if former U.N. weapons inspector Richard Butler is to be believed, the Bush administration had a vested interest in strengthening and stabilizing the Taliban regime, because a stable regime would compel investors to revive the Turkmenistan natural gas pipeline deal. The Taliban, demon of the moment, was the Bush administration's idea of a 'stable' government. Stable enough, anyway, to see the pipeline through.

The connections between Bush and the Taliban became so close that the Taliban went so far as to hire an expert on U.S. public relations named Laila Helms, so as to smooth the way between the two regimes. Meetings between the two nations continued at a high level, the last of which occurred in August, scant weeks before the September 11th attacks. All of these actions were taken to exploit the vast energy reserves in Turkmenistan for the benefit of American energy corporations.

The cozy relationship between Bush and the Taliban frustrated the investigative efforts of former Deputy Director of the FBI John O'Neill. O'Neill was the FBI's chief bin Laden hunter, in charge of the investigations into the bin Laden-connected bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993, the destruction of an American troop barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the African embassy bombings in 1998, and the attack upon the U.S.S. Cole in 2000.

O'Neill quit the FBI in protest two weeks before the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. He did so because his investigation was hindered by the Bush administration's connections to the Taliban, and by the interests of American petroleum companies. O'Neill was quoted in this book as stating, "The main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests, and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it." After leaving the FBI, O'Neill took a position as head of security for the World Trade Center. He died on September 11th, 2001, trying to save people trapped by the attack, when the towers came down on top of him. The irony in this, simply, is horrifying.

In essence, the Federal agent who knew more about bin Laden than any living American was kept from investigating terrorist threats against this country. He was hindered because the Bush administration was desperate to cultivate the favor of the Taliban, who held terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden in great esteem, so as to gain access to lucrative natural gas deposits in Turkmenistan.

If these allegations prove true, Bush and his friends allowed this affinity to hamstring investigations that could have thwarted bin Laden's September plans. If these allegations prove true, everything since September 11th has been a massive cover-up operation in which American soldiers and thousands of Afghan civilians have died. If these allegations prove true, the Bush administration has the blood of thousands of American civilians on its hands.

If these allegations carry even the faintest whiff of credibility, George W. Bush and members of his administration stand in taint of high treason and murder.

On November 7th, 2000, a clear majority of Americans came to the conclusion that George W. Bush was unfit to govern this nation. For a variety of dark and controversial reasons, that conclusion was thrown over. Sometime soon, if the media's electronic web continues to carry these sordid stories of corruption, greed and death, the American people will come to fully understand the consequences of that failed election.

It is one thing to coddle and court a corrupt energy company for political and financial gain. It is quite another to coddle and court a murderous terrorist-supporting regime, hindering anti-terrorism investigations in the process, for the purpose of exploiting valuable natural resources. The former cost a number of people their retirement funds. The latter has cost thousands of people their lives. One is criminal. The other is abominable. George W. Bush is deeply implicated in both. There will be hell to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
53. Congress was controlled by traitors who hate the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
54. Suggested question to be asked at
the next WH press conference: "Sir, we are still waiting for the administration to take responsibility for something, anything, that has happened since it took over. Can you tell us when and/or if you will ever take responsibility for anything?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
55. The epitome of neoconism: take full credit, accept no blame by lying,
mendaciousness, reichousness, sanctimoniousness, and disingeniousness. Did I miss something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
56. Once again the party of personal responsibilty
holds Clinton personally responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
58. Passing the Buck in two different directions at once.
First calling it an "intelligence failure" blaming it on the CIA and Military Intelligence. Second falling back on the tried and true by blaming Clinton.

But Dubya said he was a war president and he made the "tuff call".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
61. Terry McAuliffe should be all over the news refuting this.
The DNC needs to fight this stuff every step of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC