Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Six soldiers killed in Chechnya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dolgoruky Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:58 PM
Original message
Six soldiers killed in Chechnya
SIX pro-Russian servicemen were killed today when their jeep was blown up by a remote controlled explosive device in the heart of Grozny, the shelled-out capital of the separatist republic of Chechnya, ITAR-TASS reported.

Chechnya, Russia's Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ever wonder who funds those terrorists?
The ongoing war for control of other peoples resources continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. From what I read, like the Colombian FARC,
they get a good deal of their funding from the movement of
various kinds of contraband. I imagine with the recent
rise in Afghani agricultural production things would be
going rather well. It would not be surprising if there is
a good deal of money to be made in moving arms these days
as well, say into Iraq or certain other countries to the
South of the Caucasus.

This is not to say that it would be unexpected if they were
to get money from government sources as well, although I would
think that a bit risky for a number of reasons, but risky and
stupid seems to be what we DO these days.

Aidoneus is right about the prevalence of this sort of thing.
It never fails that when I check the news for the area there
are a few handsfull of dead Russian soldiers to report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. An indirect source of information
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 12:36 AM by teryang
...informed me some time ago that "rebels" in Chechnya were "professionals" receiving arms and support from Uncle in a similar fashion to the Afghan operation against Russia.

Take it for its worth. Terrorism is never more than a few steps removed from a state sponsor. The notion that al qaeda or another violent insurrection has an independent base and arises sua sponte is unsound. The Saudi financing documented in Forbidden Truth is very reminiscent of BCCI. It is a very sophisticated form of learned behavior. Come to think of it, BCCI and bank fraud, aren't the scoundels who brought us those now running our government? What did happen to all that ENRON money?

Your comment concerning contraband is dead on. Arms trafficking and contraband go hand in hand financing these campaigns. Remember Mena? Such off budget techniques give the operators the freedom of action and flexibility the home office prefers to keep off record. Islamist forces allegedly trafficked in heroin and fought side by side with American assets in Macedonia. As my source would say, "this is how the game is played."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. what source?
any number of things are claimed, many of them ridiculous and, if given more than a week, self-contradicting..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. All of the above.
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 11:33 AM by bemildred
It seems clear the US is intent on a course of provocation against
Russia, and has been for some time past, as with China and the EU,
in an apparent sort of divide-and-rule strategy.

But Russia is the major strategic threat, all those ICBMs, all those
raw materials. FWIW this strategy does not appear to be working
very well, if the intent was to keep Russia from re-asserting itself
and pursuing further strategic integration with it's neighbors to the
East and West.

Mr. Dolguruky's comments below are well taken, also.

OTOH, smuggling and related activities are a long standing way of
life in the Caucasus, and I doubt that these groups much depend on
Uncle Sugar, i.e. they have been "professional" for a long time.
That said, no doubt they are happy to accept such assistance as we
might choose to offer. My own feeling is that that would be a
much smaller factor in this than was the case in Afghanistan, but it's
hard to tell out here in TV land. I would suspect that the suicide-
prone fundy terrorists are simply a convenient weapon of opportunity.

Your comment about state sponsorship of terrorism is correct of
course, although areas classified as "failed states" also serve in
some degree providing - as with FARC - one has independent means.
In either case the issue is access to goods and services not normally
available to non-state actors, and the ability to pursue ones
activities without much supervision or surveillance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. a somewhat common thing
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 10:04 PM by Aidoneus
regardless of the claims to the contrary by the state, attacks on the Russian occupying forces like this occur several times weekly--that is, more frequent than on the US occupying forces in Iraq at this time but in a much smaller space. They're sometimes hard to keep track of..
Many of those living in neighborhoods near the blast will soon be rounded up, passed through the network of concentration camps, some of them tortured, and perhaps some executed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. a link for this so it doesn't get locked..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolgoruky Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Some good points made
Given the destruction of the economies of Chechnya, Dagestan, and to some extent, Ingushetia, these areas have become a fertile soil for an extra-legal (if that's the right word) economy to develop, run mainly by warlords. Maybe "warlord economy" is a better expression. The populations of these regions have become increasingly dependent on gangsters for their survival. Young men and women are sucked into criminal activities as the only means of survival, thus the warlords have a fresh supply of bodies when needed. The "Islamic" factor in all this seems to be nothing more than a flag of convenience for people like Basaev, etc. But in the chaos that has been caused by the scorched earth policy of the Russian military, it has proved to be an fertile recruiting ground for Islamic extremists, not for any deeply felt religious reasons, but because of the ideoligical vacuum that the war has created.

Here's a link to a short, but excellent background article by Rob Jones.

http://www.socialismtoday.org/42/dagestan.html

Here's another on from the Moscow Times on one aspect of the Islamic factor.

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/02/11/016.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good link from Moscow times
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 10:27 PM by teryang
Thanks-

<Abu Walid, who is believed to be about 30 years old, has donned the mantle of Omar Ibn al Khattab, the flamboyant, Saudi-born rebel leader who died in 2002, apparently after being poisoned. Like Khattab, he is said to be second in authority only to Shamil Basayev, a Chechen known for a series of raids and brutal attacks.

An expert in explosives, Abu Walid trained in camps in Afghanistan and fought alongside Muslims in Bosnia before arriving in Chechnya in 1995, according to the FSB. Like Khattab, he is a moneyman for the rebels -- receiving and distributing funds smuggled in from abroad to support the Chechens' fight.

"It's understood that he has money. Since he took over from Khattab, lots of units answer only to him and no one else," said the liaison, who spoke on condition of anonymity.>

His predecessor in interest, Emir Khattab influenced Basayev to attack its neighbor, Dagestan, in Aug. 1999, which precipitated the second Chechen war. Not a suprise that the structual relationship with the destruction of transcaucasus secular governments is maintained from the "supporters in the west."

Here's a link to a character sketch of Khattab:

http://www.diacritica.com/sobaka/dossier/khattab.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Fascinating.
Thank you, in turn, for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC