Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Finds Party Faithful In an Ugly Mood - WSJ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:40 AM
Original message
Bush Finds Party Faithful In an Ugly Mood - WSJ

(snip)

A new level of tension is emerging between President Bush and the congressional Republicans he expects to deliver his election-year agenda. Among the sore points, Mr. Bush's initiative to give legal status to immigrant workers who are here illegally, a bid to attract Latino voters, instead has roiled the party's conservative faithful. Republicans have been put on the defensive over the President's policies on Iraq. And record deficits and spending suddenly have Republicans questioning his fiscal stewardship.

(snip)

No one goes so far as to say the tension yet threatens Mr. Bush's re-election or his party's House and Senate majorities. But Republicans would like to pad their narrow margins, if they and Mr. Bush hope to achieve much in a second term. Party leaders insist they can still avoid lackluster turnout by conservative voters, which Bush advisers blame for their near-defeat in 2000.

(snip)

Activists in the think tanks and hard-line conservatives in Congress, though, insist the unrest is bottom-up, with grassroots Republicans erupting over pork-fattened appropriations bills, spending rates exceeding those of the Lyndon Johnson era and a new, budget-busting Medicare drug benefit. The conservative groups and lawmakers now "are trying to stay ahead of their grassroots base," says former House Republican Leader Dick Armey, who heads one such group, Citizens for a Sound Economy.

(snip)

In response to conservatives' anger, Mr. Bush now has struck a theme of fiscal conservatism. His administration's first targets are the highway bill and his energy package, which grew from an initial $8 billion in production incentives to $31 billion before conservatives balked. "The White House was all for the energy bill when we passed it, and now they're slowly walking away from it," says John Feehery, a spokesman to House Speaker Dennis Hastert and a top House leadership aide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Link?
I thought the administration was going to do some "sneaky" sh*t by inserting "energy bill" provisions into the highway bill.

Has anyone been keeping up to speed with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here, however it is for paid subscribers only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Part of the Highway bill had gas tax increases to pay for some of it
Bush* says no way we will allow any Tax Increases so no highway bill. He is just adamant about not paying for what they pass. Hey everyone here is a new credit card for you so spend spend spend cause times are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've always been the Black Sheep Dem. but my hardcore Repuke friends
have (honestly) dumped Junior and will vote for Kerry. (4 lifetime Repuke friends in the insurance and building contractor businesses.)

Dem. activist, this is the truth from 'my world'. But don't let this be a sign to give up and let someone else 'protect our country'. Don't stop working until Junior is tried for Manslaugher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CheshireCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I want to read the whole article!
Is it in today's WSJ? Could you PM me a few more paragraphs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Was in yesterday. How do I PM it?
Sorry, relatively new here..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oooh, excellent article!
Wish it weren't a subscriber article, it's very good. I noticed dissension in the ranks at the grass-roots level too. Our caucus on Saturday had record turn-outs and I signed up 72 new members to the party. Many were "independent" formerly bought into GOP lies. Now they are firmly in our camp.

:toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Conservatives turning liberal
The quoted story focuses on conservatives turning against Bush because he violates their conservative expectations. But some of them are having their eyes opened well beyond that point.

A friend of ours who is a life-long small-town Republican has not only changed his registration to Democratic, but is reading Al Franken and just sent us a link to the story about the Des Moines grand jury.

Once people start to think for themselves, it's amazing how much that was formerly invisible to them suddenly pops into their field of vision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC