Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Democrats Suggest Inquiry Points to Wider Spying by GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:06 AM
Original message
NYT: Democrats Suggest Inquiry Points to Wider Spying by GOP
WASHINGTON, Feb. 9 — Senate Democrats who were briefed Monday about an investigation into how Democratic strategy memorandums dealing with judicial nominations ended up in the hands of Republican staff members said they now believed the problem was far more extensive than previously thought.

Some of the internal memorandums appear to have been used to prepare one or more of President Bush's appeals court nominees to answer specific questions from Democratic senators during their Judiciary Committee hearings, Democrats said Monday.

The Senate's sergeant-at-arms, William Pickle, has been investigating how Republican staff aides were able to view and distribute to conservative news outlets several internal Democratic computer entries dealing with judicial nomination strategy. Mr. Pickle discussed his inquiry with four Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, some of whose memorandums were disclosed last year on The Wall Street Journal editorial page and in The Washington Times and a column by Robert Novak.

Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, said he learned from Mr. Pickle's briefing that the improper reading, copying and distributing of confidential Democratic memorandums had gone on far longer and had involved a greater amount of information than had previously been believed. "The extent and duration of the improper access was both remarkably longer and more widespread than I had ever imagined," Mr. Durbin said.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/10/politics/10JUDG.html?ex=1077080400&en=c5faf76b00ed61b4&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Watergate much?
But.. this will be ignored by the public. There's too many important things to be concerned about: Bush at the Nascar event. Janet Jackson's body parts. The public should be outraged over this... the dumbing down of AMerica is working..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know, Caliphoto
I think the dam is breaking. It appears as though all the lies have just piled up too high and they are having a damned tough time containing them any longer. I was, frankly, quite stunned today to hear so much continuing, negative commentary. I thought everyone would be giving * another "home run" for his MTP appearance. Instead, tons of discontent.

It almost makes one wonder if skull & bones has pulled their strings and decided that * is a loose cannon and they want him out and Kerry in. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. BINGO! Kainah...you've nailed it on the head.
This "rally around Kerry" news media stunt has absolutely convinced me that this issue was far more important than we had previously given it credit for.

Kerry was nothing more than "one of the candidates" until someone decided to bounce him to the top. We've been had. I liked Kerry... he was one of my "top 3" choices. But now I've become so incredibly baffled by the sudden "universal name recognition" and the call of "electability" that it has made me far too suspicious. It just doesn't jive with the reality I saw before this phenomena hit the teevee.

If we don't take care of the black box voting issues, and reel in the bought-and-paid-for media control of people's minds, we're NOT ever going to be a Democracy again.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. So, who in the media is
a member of S&B so that this vast conspiracy pump stays primed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Richard Scaife Mellon is S&B - Remember his media power?
Take a look at the media he has his hand in. Remember Whitewater? I'm sure it's a coincidence, but Kerry's 6.9 million dollar loan on his rowhouse was from Mellon Trust. I'm thinking that it's just a big bank in Boston, and a total coincidence, but no one has replied to me when I post questions about that.

Hey, if it means getting Bush out of office.. If this is the only way, then I'm okay (sort of) with it. I really am hoping that the conspiracy theories are just that regarding all this S&B stuff, because I want REAL change in our government this time. Not just lip service and more power to the PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Watergate was also ignored.
People forget how long it took for anything to happen.

Hell, we knew about Bush's TANG record 4 years ago, and I still remember Frank Bruni of the NYT, the reporter assigned to the Bush campaign, saying "it didn't have legs."

The TANG record has become a Rockette.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. The TANG record has become a Rockette.
Great line! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Does the Republican leadership actually believe
that Daschle & Co. will be satisfied with Miranda's resignation?

The "no government document is private property" argument won't hold up either. This better go far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annagull Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Novack, Novack, Novack: How many times does his name
have to come up before his name is synonimous with traitor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. this admin is going down as the dirtiest in history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is breaking into a computer any different from breaking
into an office to STEAL information? No! This affair has "Watergate" written all over it. Dems should take this ball and run with it. A bigger story than Bush's service record, reminicent of the dirty tricks of the Nixon WH, the story IMO is more damaging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Republicans=fascists
It's stunning that the Republicans have control over the White House, both houses of Congress, and the Supreme Court and are still compelled to lie, cheat and steal. It's like a bizarre form of genetic wiring that they be as crooked as possible.

Then again, they won't be happy until we're a one-party State-run dictatorship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. As an I.T. guy...
I can't figure out why these Repukes aren't being tried in court just like any other hacker. Didn't the guy who hacked AT&T claim that "he didn't know he wasn't supposed to, since he was able to access the stuff so easily?" I believe they convicted him and among other things, took away his use of computer systems for 5 years.

In security circles, it's a given that 80+ % of all hacks come from INSIDE the firewall by users that are authorized to use the network, but not authorized to access the files they did. This should be handled just like any one of those cases would be handled... it's a Federal offense to hack government systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Excellent point!!! Hacking government systems is a federal offense!!!
People should be taking this very seriously!!! Moreover, there has got to be a more vigorous prosecution of these offenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. This is a real problem for everybody
Finding the individuals that made it possible could be difficult. Don't be surprised if some of these folks who got caught plead ignorance or lack of knowledge of the gravity for the situation, when and if they are in front of a judge.

http://www.making-a-difference.org/computer-crime-chronicles.htm
(snip)
57. As discussed above, employees represent the greatest threat in terms of
computer crime. It is not uncommon, operators, media librarians, hardware
technicians and other staff members to find themselves in positions of
extraordinary privilege in relation to the key functions and assets of their
organization. A consequence of this situation is the probability that such
individuals are frequently exposed to temptation.

58. A further complication is the tendency on the part of management to
tolerate less stringent supervisory controls over EDP personnel. The premise
is that the work is not only highly technical and specialized but difficult
to understand and control. As an example systems software support is often
entrusted to a single programmer who generates the version of the operating
system in use, establishes password or other control lists and determines
the logging and accounting features to be used. In addition, such personnel
are often permitted, and sometimes encouraged, to perform these duties
during non-prime shift periods, when demands on computer time are light. As
a result, many of the most critical software development and maintenance
functions are performed in an unsupervised environment. It is also clear
that operators, librarians and technicians often enjoy a degree of freedom
quite different from that which would be considered normal in a more
traditional employment area.

59. There is another factor at play in the commission of computer crime.
Criminological research has identified a variation of the Robin Hood
syndrome: criminals tend to differentiate between doing harm to individual
people, which they regard as highly immoral, and doing harm to a
corporation, which they can more easily rationalize. Computer systems
facilitate these kinds of crimes, as a computer does not show emotion when
it is attached.

60. Situations in which personnel at junior levels are trusted implicitly
and given a great deal of responsibility, without commensurate management
control and accountability, occur frequently in the EDP environment. Whether
the threat is from malicious or subversive activities or from honest errors
on the part of staff members, the human aspect is perhaps the most
vulnerable aspect of EDP systems.
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why didn't our Democratic leadership know about this sooner? When
their memo's and strategy started to appear in Novak's column, and WSJ/WT's?

Why didn't they have the sophistication to know that the server was being hacked. Aren't there ways to tell these things. And, as I've said in posts before: Why were Democrats and Repuglicans sharing a server in the first place. It's not like our Dem leadership doesn't know what a corrupt group of tricksters and criminals they are dealing with. Just their dealing with Tom DeLay should have warned them of that, and have they forgotten what Watergate was about? It boggles my mind.

Plus the WSJ and WT's have some culpability here. They were publishing stolen memo's as passing it off as "leaks." This would seem to be a big ethics violation. Not that there's any ethics left in our Media, but still......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC