Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin Breaks With McCain On (Constitutional) Gay Marriage Ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:29 PM
Original message
Palin Breaks With McCain On (Constitutional) Gay Marriage Ban
Source: CBS NEWS

(COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO.) - In an interview with CBN’s David Brody, Sarah Palin signaled her support for a constitutional ban on gay marriage, a position that John McCain once described as “antithetical in every way to the core philosophy of Republicans.”

“I am, in my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage,” Palin said.

“I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do, but I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.”

When the federal marriage amendment was being debated in 2004, John McCain broke from his party’s leadership and took to the Senate floor to denounce it in notably stark language.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/20/politics/fromtheroad/entry4531945.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe she would be for "relationships outside of traditional marriage!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceejdre82 Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. she wouldn't have to worry about being a grandma so soon
if her daughter was a lesbian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. Like fucking her husband's business partner?
Good thing that doesn't violate the sanctity of marriage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. What do her "gay firiends" think of this position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What about her Running mate? Now he's got to make a stand on a Constitutional question

on gay marriage, like he didn't have enough problems. She's a gift every time she opens her
mouth without a chaperone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. She's starting her 2012 campaign ... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #33
56. I wonder what idiot is advising her if any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey Sarah... mind your own business
you nazi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. What are sp and people like 'her' afraid of? The hell she's not
judging individuals! I have a 'traditional' marriage and do not feel threatened by gay marriage. I support gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sunny_Sunshine Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. If Same Sex marriage became legal in MO - it could affect me
Even though I am hetero and have a traditional marriage. I would have to figure out whose family pays for the wedding if my son wants to get married. This could get very confusing. We might have to throw out all those tradition of what the brides family does and the grooms family does. Of course, I've been telling my kids for a long time to think beach in Jamaica or an Elvis impersonator in Vegas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #32
57. Start a new tradition regarding the paying of weddings.
Just like the white wedding dress or any really fancy dress was not part of the wedding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. cognitive... dissonance... brain... hurting...
In this corner, Sarah Palin:

"I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage,"

And in this corner... Sarah Palin:

"I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do, but I certainly can express my own opinion here"

FAIL.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. that one's easy
Gays don't count as "individuals". Gays in her view are less than human, and do not deserve the same rights as others.

I think this is really the subtext to the anti-gay marriage movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Maybe they can be counted as 3/5 of a person
as a starting point. Then they can progress through the Constitution as African-Americans have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Republicans are less troubled by hypocrisy than normal people are.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
58. But nothing about a woman having sex with more than one man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9thkvius Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Traditional marriage indeed - heh
I guess her definition of traditional marriage includes the use of a firearm to force marriage between two teenagers, one of who is pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Palin is jettisoning John
She sees the writing on the wall and realizes that they won't win in November.

Palin is setting herself up as the Religious Right candidate for 2012. Ugh. Let's just hope that her brand is so tarnished from all of this that she is no more than a blip on the political history map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. She is stupid....so are people who oppose equal rights....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. coming from a person who cheated on their spouse,
I don't see what she can possibly know about protecting "traditional marriage". Looks to me like the biggest threat it faces are people like her.

That said, how dare this illiterate moran even suggest changes to our constitution? Coming from an AIP supporter, this CONCERNS me.

Furthermore, as a human being and American citizen, I support gay rights and those include marrying their partner if they choose to do so. I am really beyond outrage at this point. How dare she? She would deem to tell other Americans what they can do? What happened to "smaller government and letting the states decide'?

HOw dare she try to stop -- at the constitutional level, no less-what people have fought so hard for -- the right to visit their partner in the hospital, the right to the same benefits other married couples get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kleec Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh please
who the hell is she to define traditional anything? Except perhaps, being a mouthpiece and windup doll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2QT2BSTR8 Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. I encourage everyone to read up on Prop 8 in CA
If Proposition 8 is passed, it has been said that it will set the GLBT rights movement back a decade as it ripples across the country.

I know that these are tough financial times for everyone, but help from everyone is needed to help SAY NO TO PROP 8 in CA.

http://www.noonprop8.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CADEMOCRAT7 Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. It will not pass.
We in CA, we will not pass prop 8. We were at a street festival yesterday, and there was a lot of support on NO to prop 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. I agree, but we must stay vigilant.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CADEMOCRAT7 Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. True. Keep speaking out and loud, and I will do the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. CALIF - Just vote NO! NO on 8. Simple
CA should never vote YES on propositions unless we are
DAMN sure what we are doing.

in this case its easy. no good argument in favor and
several compelling arguments against.
for starters, it creates an exception to equal protection of law,
a foundational protector of EVERYONE's civil rights.
in short, 8 is a legal and moral abomination.

the mormon church have made a serious blunder here. they are acting
far too much in politics, control at least two US states
and it may be damn well seriously past time to review
their tax exempt status and political activities.
they have called attention to themselves here.
we are not a theocracy, nor going to become one by inches.
I could say more, and you know I can and will if I must!

But no need now, for this matter is simple.
Just say no to 8. Its the correct thing to do.

I'm Piewhacket of DU and I approved this message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Any response on this from the Log Cabin Republicans?
...crickets chirping....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. No, they are too busy counting their money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. holy dumbness, batman!
These two strings of words they don't let me just say make a sentence between either both or neither of them as far as I can see Russia.

It's like you shake her head like one of those snowflake thingies, and then words just come tumbling out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hmmm...85% "Country on wrong track". DJIA down 75% from peak.
10% real unemployment. Foreclosures still an epidemic. War with no end. Afghanistan in chaos.

Why are we talking about this? Is there any doubt why China is pulling ahead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. I have an interesting take on this issue.
My mom is gay. She has three heterosexual daughters, two of whom are married (my youngest sister and I). I remember telling my conservative in-laws about it before I got married, fearing their reaction; but they didn't care, they viewed it as McCain did in 2004, essentially as none of the government's darned business. I was happy. My husband and I, and my sister and brother in law could give a rat's ass who my mom married (well, we'd prefer it be her longtime partner, but you know what I'm getting at). Our marriages are not in danger because our mother, the person closest to us besides our spouses, is gay. The argument that Palin et al. toss out there is bunk, theocratic BS aimed at one more way to force religious beliefs down the throats of others (and my family is Catholic, btw). So long as a marriage is loving, and trust me, my parents' marriage was anything but, the bond should be between two people regardless of sex.

Piss off, Palin. Yet, keep spewing your hateful rhetoric. The only people you're impressing are the dolts who already worship you. The rest of the sane folks think you're fit for the looney bin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. Did this woman flunk English?
'..."...speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.”...'

Is that so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. And people think she has a chance in 2012
She can't even talk to the Christian Broadcasting network and not sound like
an idiot. I really have to struggle when I read her when she is spontaneous and not under script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Those aren't people, they're right-wing fundamentalist repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. Depends on what your definition of "that" is...
She described herself perfectly when she said she was a redneck. She's ignorant and bigoted. Worse than that is the fact that she's proud of those traits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
60. She got a journalism degree...
after traveling thru 5 colleges in 6 years.

Hmm which college finally gave it to her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. What else do you expect to hear from anti-American alaskan firster...
"I am, in my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans... "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe McCain should demand a debate with Palin next. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Marriage should be between a teenage man and a teenage woman...
especially when they have a second baby on the way"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hey Sarah, you fricking idiot:
You ARE "sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do"

You are literally preventing people from doing what they want to do. Are you really that stupid, Sarah, or don't you understand what a constitutional amendment does? Or even with the Constitution means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. She is going to dump him soon, and set herself up with the base.
Her words will not be kind to McCain after Nov. 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnAnonymousDemocrat Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
52. I absolutely agree with you
She knows they've lost, so now she's abandoning the ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #29
59. Yup. Here's hoping she takes those freaks with her...
to start her own "Dominionist" party. That could well drive the wooden stake through the heart of the Republican party once and for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes coz "equal rights" is just a saying, eh Palin'?
If ya don't support gay marriage, Palin'...DON'T MARRY A GAY.

Stupid MFing useless tit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. She's just a ridiculous twunt.
Her 15 minutes should be just about up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
36. So Palin is against state's rights to make their own laws, free of federal interference?
I guess that conservative "hands off" attitude only counts when Republicans are protecting guns, not bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. well, if the "bodies" are in utero...
states rights it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I get so confused about what is and isn't conservative these days.
Amending the U.S. Constitution to repeal state laws and take away rights. Check. Very conservative, apparently.

Supreme Court decision to repeal state laws restricting constitutional rights. Terrible! Horrible! Activist judges! Bad!

Protecting the Constitution by interpreting the Second Amendment as broadly as humanly possible. Now THAT'S conservative!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. Oooh, those mavericks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
39. Hateful bigot.
Edited on Mon Oct-20-08 04:10 PM by Zhade
McThuselah picking this brain-dead idiot was the best gift he could have given us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. She wants a constitutional ban on gay marriage yet for abortion
she's all for state's rights. Palin told Katie Couric she was a states rights kind of gal about her opposition to Roe v. Wade. She even went so far as to call herself a "federalist".

"I think it should be a states issue not a federal government, mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue," said Palin, who opposes abortion except in cases where the pregnancy threatens the woman's life.

"I'm in that sense a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas," she added. http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=1489345&nid=213


In contemporary usage, as articulated by president Bush's New Federalism, federalists advocate the principle of greater regional autonomy within the United States—usually by allowing individual states to set their own agendas and determine the handling of issues, rather than trying to impose a nationally uniform solution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist#The_United_States


So which philosophy DOES she subscribe to - granting states the autonomy to govern themselves as they see fit or the imposition of nationally uniform laws/regulations?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
43. Way to get the independent vote, Sarah!
That ought to clinch...no one that has a mind to change at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
44. If you're opposed to gay marriage, don't marry a gay person.
I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do, but I certainly can express my own opinion here...

Telling gay people they can't get married IS "telling them what they can and can't do," is it not? Don't give us bullshit like that. If you're a bigoted busybody, Sarah, at least have the guts to come out and say it. But don't give us bullshit like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
46. Ain't it obvious? She's either off the reservation.....
OR THE INTENDED CANDIDATE!

My medical expert has suggested the 72 McCain is not cured of cancer
and may have at most three years, assuming he doesn't die naturally
before then.... or for that matter, accidentally eat a poison potato(e).

Yup, nobody better relax. Palin's stench has to be scrubbed from the
political landscape... and then we need to go after the scum who set
this up so it won't happen again.

lots of work to do. nobody on DU better relax.
one day off only. election day.
well, the day after too, for celebration.

Then back to work! (whip-crack)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zelta gaisma Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. off the reservation? now don't insult Am.Indians by...
connecting Palin to them! Obama is going to win over McCain/palin not by a landslide but by a Tsunami! The only good Tsunami ever I'm betting.(singing) I'm gonna wash them republicans right outta my hair!I'm gonna wash them republicans right outta my hair!(end singing)


ok I know I'm having a disturbing moment here but hey, LAUGH, we need it. At least *I* do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #49
55. Fine, you get an extra day stress leave... all other slaves, laugh once, then back to workin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2QT2BSTR8 Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. Like a fish out of water and gasping for air..
So too are the Republicans pulling out all the stops on any non issue that is facing our great country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Brethren Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. In one breath she says
she doesn't judge individuals, nor will tell them what to do. Then in the next breath, she's making it clear she plans to use her vote (and position of influence if she can) to tell us what we can't do..... which is not to be able to legally marry.

And she's so worried about standing up and protecting "traditional" marriage and the "instrument" of marriage, and somehow she apparently forgot her daughter got pregnant while not married.

Palin's stupid and a hypocrite. And look out McCain, we all know who really wears the pants in your political team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codjh9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
53. F--- her and everyone who gets in such a f-ing snit about gay marriage... and Colo.
Springs is such a PERFECT place for her to have spoken about it- I should know, I used to live there. As a bumper sticker I saw there said, "FOCUS ON YOUR OWN DAMN FAMILY'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'm glad they quoted verbatim
this woman is dumber than a box of rocks. The publicans have sunk to the bottom of the barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC