Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush* Aides Testify in Leak Probe (McClellan & Matalin)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:59 PM
Original message
Bush* Aides Testify in Leak Probe (McClellan & Matalin)
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 11:03 PM by kskiska
Grand Jury Called McClellan, Matalin

By Mike Allen and Susan Schmidt
Tuesday, February 10, 2004; Page A01

A federal grand jury has questioned one current and one former aide to President Bush, and investigators have interviewed six others in an effort to discover who revealed the name of an undercover CIA officer to a newspaper columnist, sources involved in the case said yesterday.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said yesterday that he talked to the grand jury last week. Mary Matalin, former counselor to Vice President Cheney, testified Jan. 23, the sources said. Neither is suspected by prosecutors of having exposed undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame, but both were questioned about White House public relations strategy, the sources said.

(snip)

Officials interviewed by the FBI include Karl Rove, Bush's senior adviser; McClellan; Matalin; White House communications director Dan Bartlett; former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer; Adam Levine, a former White House press official; I. Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff; and Cathie Martin, a Cheney aide, according to the sources.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26979-2004Feb9.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a rogue's gallery! Indictments are just around the corner.
What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Will Mary go down for her hero?? Stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Matalin, huh?
I wonder if Carville will have anything to say about this tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ari on-deck?
My first prediction was that it was Ari, or he was involved.

If I recall correctly, he split WH just when this happened--which had a plausible deniability/going away present feel to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep, check this thread for the Ari discussion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. most cool DU is on the case
My take: Ari leaving allowed Novak and maybe others to lamely say that no-one in the WH released Plame's name, if it was in fact Ari (or Ari in some circumstances).

How we ended up with the leaker in OEOB/Cheney--at least that was the story at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree with your take- it seems right on the money
I don't know why the focus is now on Cheney's underlings, but I'm not part of the investigation and don't know what they do.

I'm pretty sure that the media wouldn't hear about this unless there was something serious going on- the WH control is too tight to let gossip slip by the controllers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Maybe a sideways connection?
Cheney is running the admin. Cheney is 'president in all but name' ("PIABP"). Cheney is PNAC. Cheney pushes through the Iraq war on false pretenses, at the urging of his neo-con pals.

Wilson outs Cheney in the NYT on Iraq/Niger lies.

Cheney is pissed. His subs coordinate attack on Wilson via his wife.

Wouldn't they have alerted Ari as to the line of attack? So that he would be prepared to defend their position?

Ari might be, therefore, complicit, but not the architect.

Make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. same day
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 11:47 PM by Snazzy
Original Novak column 7/14:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/printrn20030714.shtml

Ari's last day, 7/14 (~24 mentions of "Niger" in the gaggle):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030714-4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. From this same report ...
"A parallel FBI investigation into the apparent forgery of documents suggesting that Iraq attempted to buy yellowcake uranium from Niger is "at a critical stage," according to a senior law enforcement official who declined to elaborate. That probe, conducted by FBI counterintelligence agents, was launched last spring after U.N. officials pronounced the documents crude forgeries."

-snip-

So: .... The FBI IS investigating the 'production' of the Niger letter .... I had no idea .... This, I presume, will point to Shulsky and the OSP ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. and to a certain....
Mr. Chalabi.....




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. So a high level WH staffer testifies to a grand jury
last week and we are just finding this out now. Remember the media frenzy when Monica testified before a grand jury? Where were the lights, cameras, action, now? Too busy replaying Janet's tit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. one lies the other attests to it
I hope they were wired to lie detectors otherwise it's useless. These people don't knwo the meaning of truth.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC