Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-judge on Iraq inquiry 'involved in cover-up'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 10:53 PM
Original message
Ex-judge on Iraq inquiry 'involved in cover-up'
Laurence Silberman, a retired judge nominated by the Bush administration as the co-chairman of the commission investigating pre-war intelligence on Iraq, was involved in a major cover-up during the Reagan era, his critics alleged yesterday.

Mr Silberman sat on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, which approved the expanded surveillance powers for the justice department under the controversial Patriot Act.

President Bush named him as the senior Republican on a nine-member bipartisan commission examining how and why US intelligence had been so wrong about Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. It will report next spring - well after the November elections.

(snip)

Judge Silberman is most notorious in American liberal circles for his 1990 judgment overturning the conviction of Colonel Oliver North, who admitted his central role in the Iran-Contra affair, in which proceeds from secret arms sales to Iran were diverted illegally to the Contra anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua.

more…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1144586,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
einniv Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a complete joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the options
for the end of your sentence:

this (fill in the blank here)

administration is
the republican party is
the investigation of "intelligence" is
these people are
our country has become
our government is

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ex_jew Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you think when the commission finds that the intelligence was
actually pretty good (no imminent threat reported etc.) that we'll need a NEW commission to figure out why we thought the intelligence was bad ?
It only makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think that we need for
the impeachment process to begin.

The "lack of intelligence" was not through the "intelligence" branches, it was the gray matter that resides in the craniums of those occupying the seats of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. could we add "GWB appointment is?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. as James Carville said today...
...he's just a right-wing hack!

A hack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. A question
Where has David Brock gone? I don't think I've seen him since the publicity tour for "Blinded by the Right" ended. Does he write for anyone anymore? (He was a really good writer even when I hated what he was writing.) Where's he gone? I'd sure love to hear him expounding on Silberman's role in the Clinton witch hunts now. Does anyone know where he's gone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I thought I heard Randi Rhodes say...
that he had a nervous breakdown or something like it. Sure I heard it about 2-3 weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like he's perfect for the job!
We haaave a Winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. What about Kissinger?
I think he is a very able and seasoned politician, very experienced in cover-ups. After he retired from chairing the 9/11 commission, he should have some free time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm really surprised
how little coverage this farce has received. The Democrats could score some big points but they'd have to make some noise first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. "Instead, the networks aired Dean's Iowa exclamation 633 times"
as written by the NY Times on Sunday. That is what gets coverage, even though the "scream" was a fiction ("Sawyer reported that Dean was using a special microphone that night that filters out crowd noise to heighten his voice; other videotapes taken illustrate that his ``scream'' was barely audible to his live audience.", CNN Says It Overplayed Dean's Iowa Scream, NY Times, 2/8/04)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC