Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report Implicates White House (E-Mails Hint at Involvement in Prosecutor Firings, Officials Say)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:01 AM
Original message
Report Implicates White House (E-Mails Hint at Involvement in Prosecutor Firings, Officials Say)
Source: Washington Post

In 18 months of searching, Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine and Office of Professional Responsibility chief H. Marshall Jarrett have uncovered new e-mail messages hinting at heightened involvement of White House lawyers and political aides in the firings of nine federal prosecutors two years ago.

But they could not probe much deeper because key officials declined to be interviewed and a critical timeline drafted by the White House was so heavily redacted that it was "virtually worthless as an investigative tool," the authorities said.

"We were unable to fully develop the facts regarding the removal of Iglesias and several other U.S. Attorneys because of the refusal by certain key witnesses to be interviewed by us, as well as the White House's decision not to provide . . . internal documents to us," the investigators concluded in their report.

The standoff is a central reason that Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey on Monday named a veteran public-corruption prosecutor, Nora R. Dannehy, to continue the investigation, directing her to give him a preliminary report on the status of the case in 60 days.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/30/AR2008093002623.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Wheels at the Justice Dept. Grind Exceedingly Slowly
but they are beginning to get at the kernel of Truth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Muuukasey at the help of the political wheel of justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps they'll indict George at his funeral in 20 odd years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. the threat from global warming
is more immediate than any threat to this criminal administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, what we have here is another, "The White House is implicated, but
will not cooperate in the investigation."

The last time this happened, the president was honorable enough to step down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes but back then the republicans had some and even knew what the word meant.
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 05:46 AM by cstanleytech
These days though *sigh* I find myself nearly unable to support many republicans, not that the democrats are saints of course just that I think most of them stand better on social policies and wanting to help everyone as much as possible.
True they have problems like Lieberman but such types are few and far between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Its NEVER too late to Impeach!
According to Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution, impeachment can be used to remove an official, including a President from Office, and, to disqualify that person from holding and enjoying any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States.

Nixon could have, and should have, been impeached after he resigned.

Bush could be, and should be, impeached after he leaves office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But impeachment might damage the public's perception of government...;-> n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. The LAST TIME? How soon you forget the stonewalling of IranContra, BCCI, Iraqgate
and CIA drugrunning matters. And the Dem president who came in after Reagan and Bush sure didn't facilitate access to those documents, either. He sided with GHWBush and the secrecy and privilege of the powerful elite who were involved in those illegal operations. And they STILL are, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. My guess is this:
If what has happened in my community is any example, the problem is that they have tainted so many people in politics, military, government, business, etc. that it's impossible to find "a reasonable person" any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fox , Henhouse
"the White House's decision not to provide . . . internal documents to us,"

Nice timing. Please report after the election = Fox , Henhouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. E-mails may hint at White House involvement...
...but the lies and stonewalling scream it. It can't be easy for Congress to ignore all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. SO WHAT !
Its gotten to the point that when I hear that the White House is implicated again I can't help but think, so what, NOBODY but Kucinich has the fortitude to step up and do ANYTHING about it, why bother telling us what most already know, the squatters in the White House are up to their eyeballs in criminal activity. Mukasey isn't going to do anything, his appointee will most likely aid and abet in the effort to make sure that nothing incriminating becomes public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Such a sad shame, but so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. When backed into a corner, ask yourself, "What would the Mafia do?"
Then do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. can we put Impeachment back on the table?
I'm still hungry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
furgee Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. I want justice
and I don't care when it comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC