Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEWSWEEK POLL: Bush's Approval Rating Slips to New Low

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:39 PM
Original message
NEWSWEEK POLL: Bush's Approval Rating Slips to New Low
Today's News
NEWSWEEK POLL: Bush's Approval Rating Slips to New Low (48%); Fifty Percent of Voters Say They Don't Want to See Him Re-Elected (45% Do);

Kerry Strengthens Lead to 48 Percent, 35 Points Ahead of Nearest Rival Dean;
Wins in Match-Up With Bush (50% To 45%)

Fifty-Eight Percent Say Gay Marriage Should Not Be Legal;
Majority Says Issue of Gay Marriage Very Important (22%) or Somewhat
Important (32%) in Determining Their Vote for President

NEW YORK, Feb. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- President George W. Bush's approval rating has slipped to 48 percent, the lowest level since February 2001, according to the Newsweek poll. Fifty percent of registered voters say they would not like to see Bush re-elected to a second term (45% say they would).

And if the election were held today, Democratic frontrunner Sen. John Kerry would win over Bush by 50 percent to 45 percent among registered voters.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-07-2004/0002105043&EDATE=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well... It Only Makes Sense After All !!!
Since the Chimpmeister is an all-time low for the presidency, it's nice to see the polls catch up (down, maybe?) to that fact!!!

:evilgrin:

Psst... Hey Beautiful, wanna come ta California???

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the gay marriage
polling is disturbing. I hope people wake up soon and don't hand Bush another term over this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Kerry has said
his position is the same as Dick Cheney's. Signalling a hard-ball defense on this issue I think. We will just have to grin and bear it and hope for better times. He has always been a supporter of civil rights for the GLBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Maybe it's not as bad as it seems
That 32 percent who think it's somewhat important likely won't consdier it a make-or-break issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If those are Fox numbers then Kerry is a shoe-in
Fox is 90% GOP Propaganda so if even they have Bush* at such low numbers then he is in serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Dragon Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Fox may be Biased, but Polls aren't
If Fox was Communist, and Hitler ran for President, and 100% of people were against him, Fox would show that 3 or 4% were still for him. Fox isn't totally stupid you know. Otherwise they'd give Bush a 70% approval rating LOL. I promise you that when other polls arrive at http://www.pollingreport.com you're going to see Kerry slipping. Kerry's past his prime now. I predict a Dean re-emergence, but kind of a weak one. Going to be fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Then why are FOX polls always so different then the rest I wonder?
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 03:33 PM by NNN0LHI
Must be a coincidence or something? Yea, sure pal. And as for "Fox isn't totally stupid you know." I agree. Just FOX viewers are.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. And why does the Faux poll include Hillary?
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 04:42 PM by alg0912
Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. You missed my point about Fox not being in line with
every other recent poll. Newsweek isn't the one that's out in left (make that "right") field. Kerry is hardly past his prime; he didn't even win the nomination yet. As for Dean, if he's sending out feelers about the VP slot, he's not "re-emerging." He's preparing to back our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. You do not believe Fox is stupid
In another thread you think Hillary is waiting to swoop down and take over the Democratic Party and that the economy and jobs are booming?

Why are you repeating Faux and GOP propaganda here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. You know why.
It's as plain as the nose on your face. Just do a search by author and read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
put out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Are you saying Hitler was Communist? Please clarify your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Not saying this was the case here, but...
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 04:17 PM by mouse7
I just got done with about a 6 day long flame war over neo-cons taking the word "socialist" from the National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZIS) and claiming that because that word was in the title of the Nazi Party, anyone to the left of Nixon was Nazis.

I was so thrown by the ridiculousness of the argument, that it took me a bit to really address the stupidity properly.

The way it's handled is by showing that in 1934, the Nazi party was purged of anyone on the left and Nazis started throwing anyone to the left of Hitler in Concentration Camps.

Also, the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) wasn't exactly a model of one-man, one vote principles.

Also, according to their rules, it proves that Republicans are really a Maoist Chinese Communists conspiracy, because just look at the name... The People's REPUBLIC of China. It couldn't be more clear that Republicans want to be Red China, right?

That pissed 'em off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Don't forget the IRA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. A little tip for you, "Liberal" Dragon
When freepers try to go undercover on DU, only the really lame ones are so obvious about "outing" themselves with a "Hillary in 2008" sig line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. You are incorrect. All polls contain bias. Fox more so than others.
That is why Fox polls consistently differ in the same direction and by the same margin from other polls concerning Bush. Fox News lacks any honor or integrity. Just like Bush himself and many of his supporters who deceptively and mendaciously post here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Almost all polls are biased...
Because they al assume "turnout models" for their pollees.

It is almost sure that "Opinion Dynamics'" own turnout models skew Republican. Fox would not pick a pollster that did not skew Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Hahahahahaha - getting nervous, LD???
Just keep watching your Fox polls and you'll feel better!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Newsweek biased? You're kidding, right?
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 03:35 PM by lancdem
A half a dozen other polls in the past week show Bush under 50 percent. Fox is the only one with him over 50 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. z z z Z. . .
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. what does "respondents pushed for decision" mean in polling terms?
Anyone know? I see the disclaimer at the lead of Fox poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Why in the name of heaven, would you be basing your opinion on
how things "look for Kerry" on a Faux "news" poll? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostmessage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Like Fox is a "real" news channel
They have an agenda and what they post or talk about I would take it with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Here's a tip, "Liberal" Dragon:
When freepers such as yourself try to go under the radar on DU, they're generally smart enough not to give themselves away so readily with a "Hillary in 2008" sig line -- got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. LOL
You beat me to it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I'm with ya, but...
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 04:43 PM by alg0912
...you shouldn't call others on this board "freepers"..it's against DU rules. Just hit alert, like I did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eddie Current Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. He has Joe-mentum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hahaha...I know that's mean, but I couldn't help laughing anyway.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. perhaps Kerry's position should be "Either the president loves freedom and
equality, or he doesn't. As President, I will protect freedom and equality to the best of my ability. I don't believe it's the President's job to promote modifications to our brilliant forefathers' Constitution that limit freedoms, that reduce equality, when our great Country has been moving forward to guarantee the greatest degree of freedom and equality in the world for over 200 years. The bush administration has reduced freedoms and limited equality more than any administration in US history, and if president bush wants to focus on limiting freedoms and reducing equality even more, I say, bring it on. In an time when our unemployment has exploded to record numbers, and promises made to make our streets safer from terrorist attacks have been broken, leaving our cities struggling to pay for additional police under the new 'bush tax,' it seems to me that karl rove's obsession with reducing freedoms even further is an insulting, wrongheaded approach for the American People."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds like it's...Time for Terrorism! ®
Go, Tom, Go

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Time To Get Osama Bin Laden Ready for His Closeup
Somewhere in the world, some production assistant is knocking on OBL's dressing room saying, "Five minutes until show time OBL."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. They will spring him but they're hoping to wait until October.
Wouldn't it be great if we could force their hand early, and get past the Osama Effect® November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Need to spend some resources on gay marriage voter education
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 04:00 PM by mouse7
This poll result is that high because people don't understand the issue. I think if we get moveon.org and some other issue advocacy groups to spend some resources on voter education explaining gay marriage as a civil rights issue, we'll recapture the middle on this. We'll never convert the hard right, but we can recapture the middle by discussing the issue as a "civil rights for all" issue. Howard Dean explained this issue very well, and the Party should borrow a page out of Dean's issue book to explain this more fully to voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC