Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Atheist soldier alleges discrimination by military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:19 PM
Original message
Atheist soldier alleges discrimination by military
Source: Associated Press

Topeka, Kan. (AP) -- An atheist soldier says in a federal lawsuit that his superiors required him to be present for Christian prayers, and that the military allows fundamentalist Christians to proselytize.

Spc. Dustin Chalker, a combat medic with an engineering battalion, alleges he was required to attend three events from December 2007 to May 2008 at Fort Riley in which Christian prayers were delivered. Chalker has served in Iraq and Korea.

Chalker and and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation filed the lawsuit against Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Thursday in Kansas City, Kan. It alleges violations of the soldier's religious freedoms.

The lawsuit alleges the military allows religious discrimination by fundamentalist Christians who try to force their views on others, especially subordinates. Its examples include programs for soldiers, presentations by "anti-Muslim activists" and a "spiritual handbook" for soldiers endorsed by Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/09/26/national/a163315D93.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought it was impossible to sue the military
But yeah, that's not right. I have no religous preference myself but I attended prayer breakfasts and other church related activities to get out of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. it is if my understanding is correct
your family members can sue on your behalf depending upon the situation (say a widow suing the military for wrongful death or something), but there is federal law that says you can't sue the military if you are on active duty. This prevents soldiers from suing their commander every time they get an order they dont like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He's not suing the military.
He is suing Gates, who is SecDef and a civilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. "I have no religous preference myself" - which means you're like the atheist in this story.
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 04:52 PM by Zhade
Since we don't have a religion, imposing any religion on us via a government official is very wrong (as you note).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Call me crazy, but the last person I'd want to piss off in my unit is my medic
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 07:30 PM by shadowknows69
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. combat medics are heroes
they are even trained to treat enemy causualties but there is an order of importance, US troops first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. My point exactly
"Oh, so I'm an asshole for not believing in Jesus huh? Well let's wait a bit and see if the Big J is gonna come and stop that bleeding."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No not crazy SMART! When I was in if your shot record was lost you would have to get them all again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. When I rode the boats
we had to all be christians because we had nuclear tipped weapons onboard. Unofficially, the Navy did not want non-believers on the subs, because a sailor who believes in the after life was much more apt to follow orders to fire nukes than someone who might have second thoughts.

Scary scenario, but I was a believer back in the day, and it made sense then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicaug Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Wow!
When I rode the boats we had to all be christians because we had nuclear tipped weapons onboard. Unofficially, the Navy did not want non-believers on the subs, because a sailor who believes in the after life was much more apt to follow orders to fire nukes than someone who might have second thoughts.

Scary scenario, but I was a believer back in the day, and it made sense then.

Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I call BS
I spent years dealing with nukes - I have never heard of such a policy. It is so blatantly un-constitutional - can you substantiate this with a link or two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. No links
I was not a nuke, and I rode the pig boats with ALL non-nuke ratings. Something got hot while playing chicken of the sea with the Soviets, and in '67 we loaded two MK-48 fish in the forward room of the Croaker (SS-246). I was IC forward watch and had to monitor the litmus color through the view window on the nose of the nuke torpedo.

The week before we loaded the torpedoes, US Naval Intelligence reps visited the boat and individually interviewed every non-enlisted, and maybe officers too. We were told that with our old 1943 era pressure hull, if we did fire a torpedo, we would probably be destroyed along with the target, even though we may be up to 12 miles away from the ground zero explosion. So I was asked (1) "Do you have a problem with the use of nuclear weapons?", and (2) "Do you believe in God?"

The pat answer for question 1 was, "If used as a deterrent, for national defense, I have no problem with nukes", and for question 2, the obvious answer about God was "Yes".

A MM and TM were transferred to another Squadron 8 boat at Groton, because they answered "No" to the God question. They were not disciplined in any way. It just seems the Navy did not want non-believers going to sea with nukes, lest they "hesitate" if the order came to fire.

As a nuke, you probably got a Top Secret clearance while you were being profiled, and I assume you did not categorize yourself as an atheist, so you and all your brother nukes did not run into a "policy", if that's what it was. On the diesel boats, most of us did not have or need Top Secret clearances, so I assume when COMSUBLANT ordered the Croaker to carry nukes, they did a quick screening of the crew to make sure we were not psychotics of the sea.

Once we convinced Naval Intelligence that as smoke-boaters we were babe magnets of superior intelligence,in the proud tradition of the submarine Navy, they let all us good christians go to sea with nuke warshots.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I have been an atheist since high school
and I never hid that fact from anyone during my 20 years in the Navy. It was never an issue.

More to the point - as an officer I managed nuke weapons security. I was never trained to disqualify people for their religious views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I never saw religion come up before or since either,
only in this instance. The interviews seemed logical to us, and no one was bothered by it. There was no sense of any sort of discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Our military is increasingly being undermined by cronyism.
Republican cronyism. They will break the rules for their own in ways that have nothing to do with integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. When they say "No athiests in foxholes", by golly they mean it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. I hope Spc. Dustin Chalker
wins his case. This is just wrong. No wonder we are in such a jam. The requirements, some (unspoken) such as this one and the No Gays in the military, forcing out vital linguists and other personnel over religious beliefs.

Whose jihad is this anyway?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC