Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin's attorney: Investigator 'biased'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:11 AM
Original message
Palin's attorney: Investigator 'biased'
Source: AP

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — A lawyer for Gov. Sarah Palin is taking another stab at derailing the Legislature's ethics
investigation into the firing of her former public safety commissioner, accusing the retired prosecutor who is
conducting it of acting unethically himself.

In two letters released Wednesday, Thomas Van Flein called the investigation "unlawful and unconstitutional" and
said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he's a
friend of the fired commissioner. Citing "your seemingly biased conduct of the investigation in recent weeks,"
he urged Branchflower to stop interviewing witnesses — the second time this month that he's asked Branchflower
to stand down.

Branchflower is looking into whether Palin, now John McCain's running mate, canned Public Safety Commissioner
Walt Monegan because Monegan wouldn't fire a state trooper who was involved in a messy divorce from Palin's
sister, a probe that has come to be known as "Troopergate."

snip

In July, Palin said she'd welcome and cooperate with the investigation, but after McCain picked her as a running
mate, Van Flein urged that the investigation be conducted by the Alaska Personnel Board, which is appointed
by the governor.

Read more: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD934A0C80



So Palin's lawyer is now trying to stop the investigation? And this was an Investigation
that Palin said she welcomed just last July.

Nice pick John :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. She was for it before she was against it.
Did I win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You win.






What gets me is this investigation was known and still McCain picked her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. A sterling example of McCain's judgement.
The scary part is that half the country is willing to vote for these morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. The longer this goes on, the more it sounds like former mayor Kwame Kilpatrick
Sarah and Kwame, birds of a feather.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. They love to make her the victim
Don't they
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. To me it seems like she is guilty and tying to hide
Also this investigation was started by the republican state legislature in
Alaska because of the evidence in the case it is not some witch hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I have trouble following the Senate in Alaska.
There's apparently a ruling bipartisan coalition that's majority dem, with dems having a majority of committee chairs but the president of the senate being repub.

To keep the peace, repub members of the coalition vote with dems, by and large, and the non-coalition repubs have markedly less power. If I understand it correctly. It makes for a dem majority leader of the Senate and a repub minority leader, even though, I think, repubs are numerically more numerous.

That makes "started by the republican state legislature" a fairly undefined statement. It was started by a senate that's 11-9 repub-dem, but which is controlled by a dem-majority coalition.

The dems are clearly in control of the process, with a bit of bipartisan support. That doesn't mean it's not a witch hunt or that it is a witch hunt. It merely means that the discussion can't be simplified too much before it starts representing a state of affairs sharply at odds with reality.

However, it'd be interesting to hear what the courts have to say about the administrative/legislative dispute. It would also be fascinating if the legislative investigation is challenged in court on the basis of the "just" and "fair" language in the AK Constitution that (even!) legislative hearings have to abide by. I'd just like to see how that particular legal contest would work out--it's a novel idea, having such a limitation on a process which is, by its very nature, either there simply for informational purposes (presumably to advance legislation--not the issue here) or for political purposes (i.e., possibly leading to impeachment, as French has said). McCarthy casts his shadow today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. thank you
I was under the impression that Alaska was a very red state and that
was reflected in their state senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. It is the Tom Delay defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth_ Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Pit bull is full of bull
nothing but
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. What a WHINER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC