Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Department Opposes 'Sneak and Peek' Ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:53 PM
Original message
Justice Department Opposes 'Sneak and Peek' Ban
Justice Department Opposes 'Sneak and Peek' Ban
Fri July 25, 2003 05:48 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Friday opposed a bid to ban the government from conducting secret "sneak and peek" searches of private property.

The legislation, overwhelmingly approved by the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday, would roll back a key provision of the anti-terrorism law adopted after the Sept. 11 attacks.

If it became law, the legislation, "would have a devastating effect on the United States' ongoing efforts to detect and prevent terrorism, as well as to combat other serious crimes," Assistant Attorney General William Moschella said.

In a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert, he said the legislation "could result in the intimidation of witnesses, destruction of evidence, flight from prosecution, physical injury and even death."

more..............

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=3162901
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. let me guess....
if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear....

somehow that doesn't make me any more trustful of their actions and intentions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL and if they use that argument....
then show us the redacted material from the 9/11 investigation! Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. no no, see
WE should believe in 'nothing to hide nothing to fear'
THEY don't play by those rules. That would be LOGICAL!!!

:head spinning out of control:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. kudos to the house on this
Nice to know that not all repubes are Ashcroftian goons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC