|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 10:54 PM Original message |
Scalia was Cheney hunt trip guest; ethics concern raised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. No, he flew at our expense. Cheney, I am sure had NO out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. so, first we hear he was flown on an energy company jet, and now it turns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LastLiberal in PalmSprings (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Who paid for Scalia's trip back to Washington? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. No, I am sure he took USAF back... being a SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
23. the kiccker is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grins (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 12:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. That's what I heard. Now.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grins (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Never mind...found who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. They just don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 10:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yeah, they pretty much have been getting everything they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Quite some Fruit Salad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ctuser (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
26. no they got it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's not a gift. It's a BRIBE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 08:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
18. If Scalia doesn't recuse himself, wonder if an impeachment drive will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. The other justices should raise a stink if he does not recuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefta Dissenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. this makes me absolutely crazy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatlingforme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Makes me sick too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. Sometimes I get the feeling, here on DU, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JitterbugPerfume (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. maddening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 12:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Surreal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. Imagine the outrage had this been VP Gore and one of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 01:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. There'd be impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. Scalia and Cheaney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. "A love that dare not speak its name. " pic here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-04-04 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
13. Obviously Scalia is using the defense of it depends.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
17. This IS too unbelievable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peregrine (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Same as the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
19. Only an idiot would expect ethical behavior from Fat Tony and Crashcart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cybildisobedience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
20. this is another case where a lack of liberal media hurts us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
banana republican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
25. Reminds me of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
28. pic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBHagman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
32. Recusal demands mean nothing to this Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
33. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Yes it did, on CBS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC