|
I first noticed how bad it was some years ago, before the corpo media lie that Hugo Chavez is a "dictator" had polluted our beautiful minds so pervasively. There was a preliminary to that lie, from the Associated Pukes, thus: "His critics say"--no quote, no attribution--"that he is increasingly authoritarian."
"His critics say...". Hm-m. I wondered who was actually saying this, and why AP couldn't just quote these "critics." So I did some research, and I could not find anyone, at that time, who had said it, except a very rightwing, old, Venezuelan Catholic Cardinal, who had spent his career in the Vatican finance office, and was fired during the fascist banking scandals in the 1980s. He said Chavez was "increasingly authoritarian."
I later learned that this Cardinal regularly railed against Chavez from his pulpit, and also that the context of his allegation ("increasingly authoritarian") was that Chavez had cut back on the government subsidies to the Church. Also, this guy was among a gaggle of rightwing Cardinals who supported the Bush-backed violent rightwing military coup against the Chavez government in 2002, which kidnapped Chavez and threatened his life, and suspended the Constitution, the courts, the National Assembly and all civil rights. Rounding up, torturing and 'disappearing' leftists would have been next, if the people of Venezuela hadn't poured out of their hovels, in the tens of thousands, surrounded Miraflores Palace, and demanded the restoration of their Constitution and return of their kidnapped president.*
There is no evidence--none!--that Chavez is a "dictator" or even tends that way. Every single allegation that "his critics" have made against him vanishes upon investigation--even just superficial investigation. Look into the facts, and you find that the OPPOSITE is true: Chavez has done more for democracy in South America than any leader in its history! And everyone there knows it. (Lula da Silva, the president of Brazil, recently, said, of Chavez: "You can criticize Chavez on a lot of things, but not on democracy." (!)). Elections in Venezuela put our own to shame, for their transparency. Venezuela has the liveliest, healthiest, most open political culture in the hemisphere and possibly in the world.
So AP is getting its info from corrupt, crazy old Cardinals, I remember thinking to myself. ("His critics say...".) This scurrilous writing tactic--unattributed allegations--seems more common now, has several forms ("Analysts say...," "Experts say...") and is often used by AP and by Reuters to dis Chavez and a whole host of new leftist leaders and Chavez allies covering the length and breadth of South America, including, most recently, the election of a leftist in Paraguay--Paraguay! (The Bush junta has "lost" South America, in case you hadn't heard.)
Degraded, low-minded, cheap, lying, obvious fascist psyops and disinformation: the Associated Pukes (and also Rotters...ahem, Reuters), straight from the Middle Ages Vatican finance office (the White House)**.
----------
*(See "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised," the Irish filmmakers' excellent documentary on the 2002 coup attempt in Venezuela, available at YouTube and at www.axisoflogic.com.)
**(Did you ever notice how much Corporate Rule resembles the Medieval Church? It's scarily similar when you think about it, and it took over a thousand years to throw off that transnational propaganda machine, torturer and property-grabber.)
|