Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New case of mad cow disease detected in Canada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 01:51 PM
Original message
New case of mad cow disease detected in Canada
Source: ChannelNewsAsia

OTTAWA - A new case of mad cow disease has been detected in the western Canadian province of Alberta, the government's Food Inspection Agency announced Friday.

The degenerative ailment known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was discovered in a six-year-old slaughtered cow, but authorities offered assurances that no part of the animal has entered the food chain.

It was the 14th case of mad cow disease discovered in Canada since 2003.

BSE is the suspected cause of a similar brain-destroying illness in humans called variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). - AFP/vm

Read more: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/368599/1/.html



Previously:

February 26, 2008

OTTAWA (AP) — Canadian officials confirmed a new case of mad cow disease Tuesday, the second such case in two months and the 12th since the disease was first discovered in Canada in 2003.



The 13th case was detected June 23, 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought
Dr Rice was in Russia ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Canada checks their cows. The U.S., not so much.
Edited on Sat Aug-16-08 02:14 PM by RC
I will eat Canadian beef in Canada. I will not eat beef form anywhere here in the United States.

To edwardlindy You're funny. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Mad Cowboy Disease is Much More Worrysome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone know how to cook tofu?
I am thinking of doing more tofu and no beef.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You rang?
All kidding aside, the only reason we don't have BSE in the US is that we don't seriously test for it, That's some scary shit, right there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You got that right...
we don't test enough. And when one organic beef company (I forgot their name, had Creek in it though) requested enough kits to test their whole herd (at their cost), the FDA balked. Guess they were afraid it might start a trend, and the big boys would have to start doing the same. Stick with organic grass fed- and get the added benefit of more omega 3 fats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good memory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks,
Edited on Sat Aug-16-08 05:26 PM by awoke_in_2003
gotta remember that. Just one more bit of proof that it is big business that really runs this country.

on edit: it is a sad statement that we have to rely on our memories to keep us in tune. May not be happening now, but soon we will not have documents (and web sites) to point to. Once the record keeping, and associated Memory holes, are taken care of, it is easy to discredit the dissenting voice by claiming insanity. "1984" is a book all americans should read (several times)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HubertHeaver Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Once the "paperless society" is achieved
and the historians are killed, the past is malleable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That term "paperless society"
is kinda funny. When I was going to high school (in the mid 80's) computers were starting to come out in force. The "Paperless Office" was something much lauded. Problem is, with cheap printing technologies, printing became cheaper (and easier) than ever. Offices have more paper now than ever before. You make a good and valid point, just a funny thought that popped in my head. Without proper and verifiable hard copies of things, which at some time in the future will be illegal to own (ala Fahrenheit 451), those in control get to re-write history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I buy a lot of beef from
Creekstone, 80-160 lbs per week, great meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. What do you do with that much?
I'm assuming you don't personally eat 10-20 lb beef a day. Restaurant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, a restaurant
I go through 80+ pounds of trimmed brisket from Creekstone and 40+ of hamburger from Creekstone. I didn't start seeking out their beef, it is just what I received when I ordered. Since then I have ordered brisket 2 times from another supplier (Sysco) when the Creekstone supplier (Ben E. Keith) was out. The fat side of the briskets in both cases all had small green spots. The spots would wash off, I'm not sure if they were fecal matter or something else but it is a little unsettling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. The answer is buying Source and age Verified meats from feeder cattle
This is a great source:

http://healthymeats.net/store/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=1_16

I have been in their processing plant several times, I would eat a sandwich off the floor in most parts. (I am in no way affiliated)

Mad cow disease is a result of feeding beef bone/blood meal and other beef byproducts to cattle. This is no longer done in the US. It is still practiced in some other countries as a supplement usually for dairy cattle. Cattle infected are always older cattle used for other purposes than meat production, when their usefulness is over they are sent into meat production. Feeder cattle are raised exclusively for meat production, 16-20 months from birth to food chain. These supplements are not needed to bring feeder cattle to weight. Feeder cattle are fed high carb diets. Animal byproducts do not help weight gain which is the sole goal of beef producing cattle ranchers/feeders.

Similar diseases have plagued people and animals when cannibalism is part of the culture or diet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. What is your take on Johne's Disease in cattle then?
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 09:49 AM by doodadem
Johne's (pronounced "YOH-nees) Disease is highly contagious, always fatal to the animal, has no vaccine and no cure. It causes severe, wasting diarrhea. Cattle can pick it up in the soil where infected animals have been for up to 5 years. It appears to affect all ruminants (animals that chew a cud--cattle, goats, sheep, etc.) It is more prevalent where there is alot of turnover, with new animals coming in often.
I learned all about it when our pet Brahma steer contracted it from our idiot neighbor's trespassing cattle. He got progressively worse over a couple years till we finally had to put him down. Successful testing for the disease depends on when the animal is shedding the cells in the lifecycle. You get false negatives. Our guy was tested twice, one false negative, one positive. Funny thing--the state lab promptly lost the positive results, so we couldn't have them in an on-going lawsuit against the neighbors. Thankfully, our little pygmy goat was negative.

Johne's gets very little press. But if you ask a cattle vet in Calif., they're fairly horrified by it. Statistics are something like 80%++ animals would test positive for it here, and across the U.S. Problem is, it can take a couple years for an animal to become symptomatic. Most have been slaughtered by then. It is so contagious, that the big farms will have two sets of equipment, one to use on the segregated Johne's cattle, the other to use on the negative ones.

Johne is being linked to Crohn's Disease in humans. Our neighbor bragged in court about regularly selling his cattle to the local Hmong population here. I would expect them to start turning up with Crohn's in the next several years.

I haven't eaten beef for about 5 years now.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I haven't heard much about it
I do know one person with Crohn's, I will ask her what she has heard from her doctors. I find it a bit unbelievable that 80% of beef have a disease which causes crohn's yet I only know one person who has the disease. My fatherinlaw is a cattle rancher and he keeps up with these things, I will ask him too. Most of our beef is raised either on our farm or on his, and I have not seen any of these symptoms in his herds when I help him work his cattle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Google it
We're up in the mountains above the San Joaquin Valley--tons of huge dairy commercial operations. I've talked to several vets about it now because of our guy, and they all tell me the same thing about it being rampant. As I was saying, most people, even cattle farmers, aren't really aware of it because an animal typically does not become symptomatic with the disease until they're about 5 years old. They may have been carrying it since they were babies, often contracting it from their mothers. Since it can live in the ground (or on equipment) for so long, it just keeps getting passed on unless measures are taken to eradicate it.

After we had to put Cowster down, we dug the entire pen out with the front end loader about a foot. Doused the whole area heavily with lime, and then put new dirt back in on top. Our little pygmy goats in there have been fine. Every time the neighbors have let their cattle trespass on our land, I start the 5 year clock over again as to when we may be able to have another cow. It's a shame they can't be quarantined, as they go all over the neighborhood socializing across the other neighbor's fences with their cattle. Nobody gets excited about it because they never keep their animals that long............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Creekstone's case to test all their cattle for BSE still pending against the USDA.
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 10:36 AM by seafan
In March 2006, Creekstone launched a lawsuit against the USDA for refusing to allow complete testing. On March 29, 2007, Judges James Robertson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that USDA cannot lawfully prevent Creekstone from testing its cattle for BSE. USDA's appeal of that decision to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is pending.

The company reports that Japan's ban on U.S. beef beginning in 2003 caused the company to lose a third of its sales, prompting the layoff of about 150 people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creekstone_Farms_Premium_Beef




Bush's USDA is fighting tooth and nail to stop Creekstone and other independent beef producers from testing all their cattle for BSE before slaughter. *Big Cattle Producers* who are among the top contributors to the Bushes certainly can't have THAT. Other countries don't want our untested beef, but to Bush's contributors and his USDA, if they can run the smaller beef producers out of business, then it's worth shaving off some of their own revenue to accomplish it.

I cannot WAIT to clean out all of Bush's cronies in the USDA, FDA, EPA and the other (now-gutted) regulatory agencies, so we can again focus on protection of our public health regulations, the way we all deserve from a healthy government.


Here is Creekstone Farms' website. We should support them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Creekstone is a fairly large processing facility
which looks like most other facilities spotting cattle country. It is difficult to know if you are buying their beef unless you are buying it at the wholesale level as they are wholesale only. I doubt that all the stores carrying their products listed on their site are selling Creekstone exclusively. That is why I like buying from a small independent processor like Krehbiel's (linked above healthymeats.com) for my meats at home.

It will be interesting to see if there are any real improvements with a Dem administration. I hope there is meaningful change. Democrats haven't exactly been diligent against factory farm operations in the immediate past, Tyson comes to mind. NAFTA/GATT weren't good for small farmers and failure to require country of origin on food hasn't been helpful to small farms either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let the kneejerk panic resume! (Nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Being a vegitarian might not help. Looks like prions may be spread to cattle through the soil.
Looks like you may be able to get the things by "grazing" on sprouts and tofu from contaminated soil.

Resistant Prions: Can They Be Transmitted By Environment As Well As Direct Contact?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=228x42928
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. August 29, 2008: US Court of Appeals halts Creekstone Farms from testing its cows for BSE.
Another slap in the face by Bush's USDA. Public health BE DAMNED.


Court bars meatpacker tests for mad cow

By Charles Abbott
Aug 29, 2008 7:47pm EDT

Reuters


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Agriculture Department is within bounds to bar meatpackers from testing slaughter cattle for mad cow disease, a U.S. Court of Appeals panel said in a 2-1 ruling on Friday.
Creekstone Farms Premium Beef LLC, a small Arkansas packer, filed suit on March 23, 2006, to gain access to mad-cow test kits. It said it wanted to test every animal at its plant to assure foreign buyers that the meat was safe to eat.

.....

In a 25-page ruling, Appellate Judges Karen Henderson and Judith Rogers said USDA has authority under the 1913 Virus-Serum-Toxin Act to prevent sale of mad-cow test kits to meatpackers. USDA interprets the law to control products for "prevention, diagnosis, management or care of diseases of animals."
David Sentelle, chief judge of the District of Columbia appeals circuit, dissented from the decision. He said USDA "exceeds the bounds of reasonableness" for a law enacted to prevent the sale of ineffective animal medicine.

USDA allows the mad-cow test kits to be sold only to laboratories that it approves. It says the tests should not be used as a marketing tool and the cattle that comprise the bulk of the meat supply are too young to be tested reliably.

.....

Two large export markets, Japan and South Korea, accept beef only from younger U.S. cattle. Mad cow is found mostly in older cattle. Its incubation period is two to eight years.

Creekstone said it lost $200,000 a day due to reduced U.S. beef exports when it filed its lawsuit.
In its lawsuit, Creekstone argued the 1913 law could not be invoked to prevent use of products like "rapid test" kits for mad cow disease and the kits were not a "treatment" for livestock.
U.S. District Judge James Robinson had ruled in March 2007 that USDA could not control mad cow tests because they are not a treatment for animals.

The United States applies a number of safeguards against mad cow, formally named bovine spongiform encephalopathy. They include a ban on using cattle parts in feed and requirements for packers to remove at slaughter the materials most likely to carry the mad-cow agent -- the brain, spinal column and nervous system tissue.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Watch Beef Industry Take a BIG HIT... no testing.... no purchase!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC