|
"After the inauguration, he bear-hugged to the continent's three most prominent leftists, Bolivia's Evo Morales, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa."
Other important allies include Brazil's Lula da Silva, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and Chile's Michele Batchelet--all identified as present for Lugo's celebration--and also Tabare Vasquez of Uruguay (don't know if he was present). Lulu holds the keys to the hydroelectric contracts, which will be an important factor in Paraguay's climb out of dire poverty, since hydroelectric power is just about their only resource.
Lugo is surrounded with friends on every side, and all the way up the continent to Venezuela. Like Bolivia, Paraguay is landlocked. (Bolivia was, until the Batchelet government ended that long dispute over Bolivia's access to the Pacific.) But Paraguay now has a big friend to the east--Brazil--on the Atlantic, and friends to the west (Bolivia, Argentina, Chile) on the Pacific. The humungous road that Brazil and Venezuela are funding, to stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific, through Bolivia, will aid Paraguay as well. In fact, Bolivia's economic/political health is critically important to Paraguay--which is why Morales' near 70% (utterly overwhelming) mandate from Bolivian voters last Sunday is such a good omen for Lugo--as well as the entire region. These Bush-backed fascist separatists in Bolivia border Paraguay. Trouble in those Bolivian provinces (civil war, slavery, oppression of the poor and the brown, U.S. interference) IS trouble for Paraguay.
----------------------
The Photo
Thank you for this photo, Judi! Apparently, Fernando Lugo and Rafael Correa have a friendship of long standing. Lugo may have met Correa back when Correa was doing social work among the indigenous population in Ecuador (teaching in a mountainous community, learning the indigenous language). Lugo, of course, has long lived with the indigenous poor in Paraguay, eschewing the monarchical pomp and circumstance that Catholic bishops often display, and actually living with, and in the circumstances of, the poor--just as U.S. educated economist Correa did in Ecuador. There is a spiritual connection, I think--a spiritual mandate or knighthood of some kind, that is being manifested all over the continent, but especially in the poorest countries, where the indigenous population is largest, and where, historically, the Catholic Church aligned with the rich white Europeans who conquered (slaughtered and oppressed) the indians. But that is not all they did. They also assaulted and nearly destroyed indigenous culture, which holds reverence for Mother Earth as its fundamental principle. The Catholic Church has, of course, been at war with the Mother Goddess for two millennia, and are really more responsible than anyone else for the anti-Nature attitude of modern corporate/capitalist culture which is literally killing the planet. Destruction of reverence for Nature is the foundation upon which this very un-Jesus-like Church institution has been built.
In Latin America, however, two things occurred: The indigenous reverence for Nature never died (despite every effort to exterminate it), and the natives embraced the Blessed Mother Mary of the Catholic Church with a passion seen nowhere else. I would venture to say that she IS Mother Nature--the chief deity of the most ancient cultures--with a new name: Our Lady of Guadalupe (who appeared to a poor indian in Mexico, and was adopted by the Church as the symbol for the Church throughout Latin America).
It was fascinating to me, then, when Evo Morales was inaugurated--the first indigenous president of Bolivia--that the tribes in the Andes came down out of the mountains (10,000 people including ceremonial leaders) to invest him as their leader, in their own special ceremony. Clearly what we are seeing in South America--especially in the Bolivarian countries--is a RE-MIX of the indigenous and the Christian philosophies and social trends, in a more balanced way than before. It is a very different kind of leftist movement than we are familiar with in the north, which--with some exceptions (for instance, the activism of the Jesuit Berrigan brothers against the Vietnam War, and the long standing Catholic Worker movement)--has been atheistic and materialist (along traditional communist lines). Latin America has a unique culture, and one that we in the north don't understand very well. We tend to see things in strictly political and economic terms. But I really do think that something deeper is happening in South America. And this photo speaks of it.
At first I was startled--taken aback, uncomfortable--seeing a women kneel beside (and almost to) the two men (who are ignoring her): one who looks like a young god (my goodness, what a looker Rafael Correa is!), and the other a sort of kindly old father god, with his presidential (monarchical) sash--but with an open-necked shirt, a big smile and (unseen in the photo) sandals on his feet! And this woman--in the dress required by the Church, which most represents their anti-female, anti-nature attitudes (a nun--non-sexual, obedient, covered up like an Arab women--which is where that tradition came from--the East). She is so sweet looking--a quiet, obedient servant. (I don't really know if she is quiet and obedient--but this photo makes her look that way.) While the men do their brotherhood thing, she kneels and sews. Where is the Goddess in this picture? The saucy woman, the fertile woman, the giver of life, or the woman with stars around her head, worshiped by all--the compassionate one?
Well, the picture is just a casual snap. It wasn't set up to mean anything in particular. And I don't want to read too much into it. But I would say that somehow--as in the Arthurian legends--the Goddess is within. She is inside of these two compassionate male leaders (and their allies)--she has been internalized--and the nun kneeling is an artifact of the whole Catholic paradigm in South America, which is not quite ready yet for women's rights. In Venezuela, the whole 69-amendment socialist proposal went down to defeat (very narrowly), in my opinion because one of the amendments proposed equal rights for gays and women (and Venezuela has a particularly rightwing clergy; the right really hammered on that issue). Although two of the new leftist leaders are women--Batchelet in Chile, and Fernandez de Kirchner in Argentina--it's interesting how Fernandez had to assure voters that she is a strong and independent leader. In her inaugural speech, she in effect apologized for being a woman--or at least acknowledged that that was an issue to many Argentinians (how can a woman govern)? She is a very accomplished and experienced leader, but her sex was still an issue. It may have been partly because she succeeded her husband (Nestor Kirchner) in the presidency (Batchelet did not), but still, Fernandez's speech gave me pause. (And I don't know if Batchelet has had any problems along this line.)
The new leftist leaders are obviously an enlightened crew--but they are addressing issues of fairness, justice, poverty and prosperity (and who benefits from prosperity)--in a social matrix (ahem) that many of us northerners don't understand and should not assess superficially, in strictly political/economic terms. Those terms are not adequate to the situation. And that a Catholic bishop could get elected president of Paraguay--and a leftist, no less--points to the mysterious, unfathomable nature (to northerners) of a culture that is now far to the left of the U.S., while not enshrining the separation of church and state (the way our revolutionary founders did, and the way typical socialists and communists do). The Catholic church and the indigenous tribes are both profoundly influencing developments in South America. And the politics of this revolution is coming out of those influences, not the other way around. Here, our politicians mouth religious pablum in the most hypocritical way imaginable (and then go off and slaughter a million people to get their oil). In South America, the new leaders take what Jesus said seriously and understand that past treatment of the indigenous has been appalling and un-Christian, and they actually listen to the indigenous on environmental matters, such as mining, deforestation, and pesticide use and other bad, planet-killing corporate practices.
Pesticide use and its impacts on poor indigenous workers is a huge issue in Paraguay (corporate ag soy farming and export for biofuels). You could almost say that that is the issue that got Lugo elected. He is acutely aware of it. His parishioners are the poisoned. Indigenous farming is different. It is small-scale, wholistic, and reverential toward nature. And here we have a former bishop--representative of the anti-Nature Catholic Church--strongly aligned with the indigenous, who are appalled at corporate rape of Mother Nature. And that is a political/economic development that we cannot fully understand, unless we happen to be Latino, or are steeped in Latin American culture. The fascist minority are "westernized" (corporatized) colluders in the rape of the land, and are, well, the minority--mostly the rich, urbanized elite and big landowers. What is happening is the majority is taking power, and the majority are indigenous (or mixed race), who are steeped in this mysterious mix of "Pagan" and Christian beliefs.
|