Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama proposes tapping oil stockpiles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:59 PM
Original message
Obama proposes tapping oil stockpiles
Source: AP

LANSING, Mich. — Barack Obama put forward a broad energy plan Monday designed to end U.S. reliance on imported oil within 10 years and shore up his standing amid a tightening White House race and high-anxiety over gas prices.

Obama's new proposal, though, includes two significant reversals of positions he has taken in the past: He had steadfastly fought the idea of limited new offshore drilling and was against tapping the nation's emergency oil stockpile to relieve pump prices that have stubbornly hovered around $4 a gallon.

Not only did Obama push for drawing from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, he also reiterated his changing position on offshore drilling — first revealed last Friday — suggesting that he could live with it if done in an environmentally sound way and as part of a bipartisan energy compromise.

In a speech in Michigan, the Democratic presidential nominee in waiting also endorsed long-term work on hybrid cars and renewable energy sources.

"Breaking our oil addiction is one of the greatest challenges our generation will ever face," the Illinois Democrat told a supportive audience as he embarked on a week to focus on energy issues. "It will take nothing less than a complete transformation of our economy," he said.



Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/politics/5923267.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Honest and Truly, I'm REALLY TRYING to like this guy....
And every time I get close, he changes a position. I'm trying very hard, people, whether you believe it or not. But he is NOT making it easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I know how you feel
I truly do. And I wish that I didn't. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyDude Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. The Democratic position has been to open up the oil reserves for some time
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Do you have a link or are you just guessing? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyDude Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I have multiple links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Pelosi on SPR, I remember that one, and the advice. I still am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. Same here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. whatever dude!
hey b o, you don't have to pander so much...screw the right wing wack jobs, they will never vote for you. the answer to our energy problem is simple, drive less, drive higher mileage vehicles, ride a bicycle, motorcycle or scooter if and when possible. the price of gas goes up and down like a yoyo so don't promise miracles...stick to your core beliefs man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tapping the SPR won't do much.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 02:22 PM by Angleae
Not enough oil in there, about 500-600 million barrels. And they will want to refill it later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Just the Threat Of Tapping Those Reserves Dropped the Oil Price Like a Stone
This is a shot across Big Oil's bow and the speculators' bows and they lowered their colors and prepared to be boarded. I expect great positive changes will continue, now that Obama has their measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
39. Threatening to tap it without actually doing so
is much like the boy crying wolf. It only works a couple of times before being ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aimee Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. The definition of politics is it's the art of compromise...
If I am reading his statement right, he is saying that to get the kind of investments necessary for alternative energy, it took agreeing to some off-shore drilling... I think he is just trying to compromise to get what he really wants... He is a facilitator and that is what they do to get things done... The only alternative is gridlock which means doing nothing and who needs more of that...

Aimee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Really, no offense, but Pickens is there....
...and he isn't asking for drilling or the oil reserve. Obama does not have to do this the "easy" way: he's getting bad advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aimee Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Obama and Pickens are in different situations...
Pickens is not in a position to vote on any kind of energy plan... Obama is, and he is saying that the compromise bill that the "10" in Congress have come up with is something that he could live with... Pickens is suggesting what he would like to see done and I agree that oil drilling is not a reasonable answer, but Obama has the power to vote on decisions being made now....not just what he would "like to see" being done... There is a difference...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. T. Boone was on a talk show last week
pushing his wind power but he also stated he was for drilling in Anwar and off shore. He hasn't given it up all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. No link? Too bad: I'd like to see his opinion on ANWR/off shore
drilling. His commercials haven't indicated he's for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. I am sorry I can't remember what talk show it was but
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carp Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Error, you get about 20 gallons of gas from a barrel, not 5 gallons.
This drops your 800,000 to 200,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyDude Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. You get 42
Mathematically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. There's 42 gallons of crude oil in a barrel; 20 is a typical figure for gasoline from it
with other products from it too (diesel, kerosene, heavy fuel oil, etc.) See eg http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/eng99/eng99288.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. The media's spinning it as a flip flop.
I guess he should just stop laying out his policies. I mean no matter what he says it's going to be called a flip flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Or, stick to his guns.
He'll get more respect that way, from the people he needs to respect him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I wonder if he consults his advisors before he
comes out with a new proposal. I wonder if there's somewhere there to say "McCain will spin this a flip flop, don't do it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Even if he believes this move is best, it's a bad move politically.
He WILL be called a flip flopper. Guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nedbal Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. also endorsed long-term work on hybrid cars and renewable energy sources.


wow what a new fresh idea


DIDN'T McCain push this like a month ago


this is sad , sad



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. why does Obama seem to want to increase Nader's percent?
I guess the Gore/ Nader thing was hard for me. If Gore could have only encouraged that Nader vote to vote Gore! I think I just don't want to see Obama lose for any reason, I think will lose my mind if McCain wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. No sooner does he say this
then Bush pushes the price of crude down 5 dollars a barrel today! Sometimes you just can't win for trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. We should NOT dip into our oil reserves...
We're very hungry, but we aren't starving.

Those reserves should be locked up unless we have some kind of Mad-Mad scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
41. Agreed
The strategic reserve is to protect us from a cut off of oil imports. That hasn't happened. If we were short-sighted enough to drain the reserves, what do we do next?

I also don't buy that just talk of tapping them dropped oil prices "like a rock". They've been dropping for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenocrates Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. The SPR can only pump OUT a max 4 million bbl a day
And this is raw crude. About half is sweet, ie easy to refine, while the other half is sour, has much much more sulfur in it. It won't affect prices in the slightest.

I've always considered the SPR as a military reserve before any of us might get any benefit from it. Japan has the second largest SPR, and they learned the hard lesson of running out of oil in times of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm not a purist. I believe in compromise when done with good intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCamus Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why end buying oil from Canada and Mexico? We get twice as from them than from the Saudis.
"Barack Obama put forward a broad energy plan Monday designed to end U.S. reliance on imported oil within 10 years"

What's wrong with buying from them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. in return, we sell them the refined gasoline products much like Europe does w/ Iran
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 04:28 PM by ohio2007
its still an imbalance.
It is time to end U.S. reliance on imported oil and rape China with selling them oil to balance trade everyone seems to be whining about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tidy_bowl Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. Obama needs....
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 04:31 PM by tidy_bowl
.....to get back to the positions that served him well in the primaries. He needs to say NO to the FISA immunity, NO to offshore drilling and say YES to public financing. Once he does he will have the electorate behind him as a solid leader. This 'nuancing' is just giving ammo to his detractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Release the oil reserves . . and end this oil industry war on Americans --- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Once the military is goes to all Hybrid power we won't need the reserves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. solar F-15's on order...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. as he should....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Americans can expect a drop of oil in a whopping 7 years, we want prices to drop fu*king NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. Planning for the future is a good thing
Do you recommend kids drop out of school after 5th grade because they won't need a diploma for 7 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. Some people may want to listen to the actual speech.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x165497

In a 33-minute speech laying out a clear and bold plan to move our country away from oil addiction, at the same time providing jobs and fighting global warming, the media takes out a small sound-bite where he is laying out some short-term measures that could ALSO be taken, including SWAPPING (not just selling) some of the reserves.

But who has time for facts when spin is so much easier to grab onto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. As SCE would say, c'mere you.
:* Those damnable facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
42. Death to the SPR !
It is the most agressive weapon in the u.s. arsenal.

You can take out any oil-producing country (except Saudi Arabia and Russia), and if that country retaliates in it's only way possible by cutting off it's oil supply, then you can easily make up the lost production. e.g. you have about 300 days of Iranian oil supply.

Making yourself immune from attack really opens up your options (agressively).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. e.g. The long walls from Athens to it's port, Piraeus
(snip)

With the building of the Long Walls, Athens essentially became an island within the mainland, in that no strictly land based force could hope to capture it.<6> (In ancient Greek warfare, it was all but impossible to take a walled city by any means other than starvation and surrender.) Thus, Athens could rely on her powerful fleet to keep her safe in any conflict with other cities on the Greek mainland.

The walls were completed in the aftermath of the Athenian defeat at Tanagra, in which a Spartan army defeated the Athenians in the field but was unable to take the city because of the presence of the city walls; seeking to secure their city even against siege, the Athenians completed the long walls; and, hoping to prevent all invasions of Attica, they also seized Boeotia, which, as they already controlled Megara, put all approaches to Attica in friendly hands.<7> For most of the First Peloponnesian War, Athens was indeed unassailable by land, but the loss of Megara and Boeotia at the end of that war forced the Athenians to turn back to the long walls as their source of defense.

(snip)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Walls

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. I hope you are kidding.
That is ridiculous. The fact that the United States has an emergency supply of oil is "the most aggressive weapon in the u.s. arsenal"? Have you ever heard of nuclear weapons?

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is an insurance policy. Insurance policies are not aggressive.

I lock my door at night. Is that a sign of aggression?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC