Changes in the Price of Gasoline Compared to Other Common Consumer Items
Compared to most other products, gasoline is a bargain. Its price has increased less since the early 1980s than the average price of other consumer goods generally. Changes over time in the price of a gallon of gasoline and other consumer items are measured in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI is defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as “a measure of the average change in prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and services that consumers purchase for their day-to-day living needs.”1
The below list shows how the price of gasoline has changed over the past 21 to 23 years in comparison with changes in the price of a sample of other goods and services that people buy for daily living, such as, food away from home, housing, and medical care. The CPI base period of 1982-84 is used to measure price changes. For example, with 1982-84 equal to 100, the index value for “All items” in February 2005 is 192. This means that the average price (including all taxes) of a fixed market basket of goods and services increased 92 percent
between 1982-84 and February 2005. In comparison, the index value of gasoline (166.8) shows that its price increased 66.8 percent, or about one-fourth less than the average for “All items.” The higher index value for the other consumer items demonstrates that the prices for these items have increased more than the price of gasoline.
Gasoline 66.8%
Food 88.7%
Food away from home 91.4%
All items 92%
Housing 93%
Personal Care Service 102.9%
Motor vehicle maintenance and repair 103.5%
Public Transportation 108%
Rent of Primary Residence 114.8%
Services 126.9%
Fruits and Vegetables 134.2%
Medical care 218.7%
Educational Books & Supplies 257%
Tuition, school fees & supplies 330.2%
Hospital and related services 332.6%
Tobacco & smoking products 396.1%
(1 The price data used to construct the index are collected monthly by Bureau of Labor Statistics representatives who record about 80,000 prices from
selected department stores, supermarkets, service stations, doctor’s offices, rental units, etc., throughout the U.S. See U.)
The oil and natural gas industry is probably the world's largest industry. Its revenues are large, but so are its costs of providing consumers with the energy they need. Among those are the cost of finding and producing oil and natural gas and the costs of refining, distributing and marketing it. The energy Americans consume today is brought to us by investments made years or even decades ago. Today’s oil and natural gas industry earnings are invested in new technology, new production, and environmental and product quality improvements to meet tomorrow’s energy needs.
The industry's earnings are very much in line with other industries and often they are lower. This fact is not well understood, in part, because reports typically focus on only half the story-the profits earned. Profits reflect the size of an industry, but they're not necessarily a good reflection of financial performance. Profit margins or earnings per dollar of sales (measured as net income divided by sales) provide a more relevant and accurate measure of a company or an industry's health, and also provide a useful way of comparing financial performance between industries large and small.
For the second quarter of 2005, the oil and natural gas industry earned 7.6 cents for every dollar of sales compared to an average of 7.9 cents for all U.S. industry. Many industries earned better returns in the second quarter than the oil and natural gas industry. For example, banks realized earnings of 19.6 cents on the dollar. Pharmaceuticals reached 18.6 cents, software and services averaged 17cents, consumer services earned 10.9 cents and insurance saw 10.7 cents for every dollar of sales.
AND this from the NYT Business Editorial
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/26/business/yourmoney/26every.htmlEverybody's Business
What Is an Oil Company, Anyway?
Published: February 26, 2006
SOMETIMES I wish that the whole world celebrated a Teachers' Day. It would demonstrate our gratitude to the magnificent teachers we have had during our lives.
I think of Ms. Bratt, my third-year Latin teacher in high school, who had us all dress in togas and read Cicero's Catilinarian orations. I think of my great first-year Humanities and Contemporary Civilization teachers at Columbia, Mr. Fiering and Mr. Rothschild, and my disturbingly on-target teacher of Eastern European history, Mr. Rothstein.
And I especially think about my great economics teacher, C. Lowell Harriss. On the very first day of class, he changed my world view when he said, "Now, when I say 'corporate shareholders,' think 'widows and orphans.' "
This admonition comes to mind when I read the recent criticism of oil company profits. (I guess that the criticism is mostly of Exxon Mobil's profits; many other oil companies are not showing profit gains.) But when I hear representatives and senators speaking about the supposed wrongs of oil company behavior, I go back to my great Professor Harriss and think: "Wait a minute. These guys are asking us to punish oil companies. But what do they mean when they say 'oil company'?"
What is an oil company anyway? Consider Exxon Mobil, the largest domestic oil company and the largest stockholder-owned oil company in the world (though far smaller than many state-owned oil companies like Aramco or Pemex).
Exxon Mobil has about 85,000 employees. An overwhelming majority are working in oil fields producing oil, working in refineries making gasoline and heating oil from crude oil, shipping oil on large ships, taking orders for energy products, filling out forms, making sure machinery does not break down.
They are making sure that the computers are running, serving lunch in the cafeteria, writing speeches for the top executives, filling out medical care forms, driving vans. When Hurricane Katrina devastated southern Louisiana, many of them took to their boats to help people and animals stranded in the high waters, then worked full time to get their refineries running again.
Are we angry at them? I can tell you, since I am close friends with a man who wrote speeches for a top executive, that they are not wildly well paid, particularly by Wall Street or Hollywood standards. Out of the 85,000, only a few earn more than a million dollars in salary a year, which is training-wheels pay for investment banks or big Hollywood talent agencies.
Are we angry at them for high oil profits? If so, why? All they are doing is providing us with our energy and our heat and our locomotion as well as they can at reasonable pay.
I have spent some time in this space talking about executives who reap millions from their companies while their employees suffer. That is not the case at oil companies, or at least not at Exxon Mobil. Its executives pay employees decently, take care of their medical bills even in retirement and do not drain hundreds of millions of dollars out of employee pay to make themselves rich. If the executives of Exxon Mobil become rich (and some do), they do it through long years of making the company profitable, not through vampirizing their employees.
Are we angry, then, at the owners of the oil companies? Maybe, but then it's self-hatred. Roughly 41 percent of Exxon Mobil stock is owned by retirement funds, private, public (federal, state and local) and individual retirement accounts. In other words, by us.
It is demonstrable that many retirement funds hold a great deal of oil stocks, including Exxon Mobil. Of the other owners, the largest holdings by far are at mutual funds and exchange-traded funds — generally vehicles for middle-class investors and retirees.
No individuals own more than 1 percent of the stock, and the largest single personal holding, representing far less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the company, is owned by Lee R. Raymond, the retired chief executive, who took the company through some very rough sailing to arrive at its present, fairly secure position.
ONE of the largest holders is the College Retirement Equities Fund, for higher-education teachers and others. Are we angry at them? If teachers get a bigger retirement because oil company profits are up, are we sad?
So, when gasoline and heating oil prices go up — prices that are set by the markets, not in the Exxon Mobil boardroom in Irving, Tex. — why are we angry at the schoolteachers and retired police officers who own Exxon Mobil and who can now buy new golf clubs?
We can be angry at "them" all we want, but it does not make a lot of sense because, at the end of the day, "them" is us. Or as Pogo Possum, a cartoon figure of the past, used to say, "We have met the enemy and he is us." And thank you again, Professor Harriss.
Ben Stein is a lawyer, writer, actor and economist. E-mail: ebiz@nytimes.com.
Some of the information I provided above may be a few years old but the basis of my argument still holds true!