Reuters Sees Baghdad Bodies, Look Like Saddam Sons

[FlashHarry]

Yahoo/Reuters story here.

Too short to post a snippet.

[rustydog]

1. Photos resemble the sons...but...

The bodies look like they were severely beaten and not shot.
For a 4-hour stand off against 200 troops, it is interesting not one head shot was made.

I don't know if you have seen what bullets do to the human head, I have and these guys had their heads kicked-in

Of course, that is my opinion...dead is dead, whether shot or beaten to death, but it makes one wonder, WHEN were these guys captured and how were they killed..it is so convenient they turned up when Bush needed dead bodies the most. Of course, the obvious question is:
Where is Saddam, why can't you get him?
Where is Osama? remember him?

[rjbcar27]

2. Can't see how they were beaten

Would have thought the injuries sustained from flying masonry, metal etc from the anti-tank rounds fired into the building. Just my tuppence worth.

[glarius]

3. Why didn't they tell us yesterday the faces were "rebuilt"?

This administration never does things right....Yesterday was the time to tell us the faces were reconstructed, when they released the first photos....They are so damned dumb...They just make things look more suspicious for themselves!

[FlashHarry]

4. Exactly.

That way, even if they do 'find' WMD, nobody'll believe them.