just for this purpose--as a staging area for military ops against Venezuela and Ecuador, countries run by leftist, democratic leaders, who control the largest oil reserves in the western hemisphere, and who believe in using the country's oil profits to benefit the poor majority. The Bushites don't have much time left in which to use the U.S. military for stealing other peoples' oil, and leaving death and mayhem in their wake. They won't win with a direct assault on Venezuela and Ecuador. Believe me, Latin America would rise up as one and kick the U.S. military out of the region, and shut down U.S. embassies and break off relations with the U.S. Right, left, center--doesn't matter. They would be virtually unanimous on this. I have very good reasons to believe this, which I won't go into here. So, the Bushites need, a) a proxy for their war (which they have--Colombia is a Bush Cartel client state, at our expense), and b) an indirect strategy, as backup to their strategy of directly provoking Venezuela and Ecuador into a war with Colombia (which they've already tried to do--on March 1 of this year--but failed; Chavez was too smart for them).
The indirect strategy is to collude with the rightwing faction in the oil-rich state of Zulia, in Venezuela (a province adjacent to Colombia) to secede from Venezuela and ally with Colombia. Documents have been leaked (transcript of a meeting) implicating Bush/U.S. Ambassador Brownfield in such a plot. They are pursuing a similar strategy in Bolivia--which may be a dry run to test South American reaction, but was more likely originally planned as a straightforward grab of Bolivia's gas and oil reserves in the eastern provinces, using the white separatist movement. One of the four provinces just voted to secede. They are supported, funded, organized and probably armed by the United States of America. (Bolivia has an indigenous president, its first; it is a largely indigenous country. The racism of the rich white minority is virulent--and naturally the Bushites would stir that up). Meanwhile, Paraguay elected a leftist president for the first time, ever--overturning 60 years of rightwing rule, and throwing a monkey wrench into Bushite plans. The gas/oil-rich Bolivian provinces in question are adjacent to Paraguay. Both countries are land-locked, but Paraguay has a significant U.S. air base, capable of landing large transports, and the rightwing government had been cooperating with U.S. military exercises. The new leftist president opposes both the base and the exercises, and would not likely approve U.S. interference with his neighbor Bolivia.
In an op-ed in the Washington Post*, on 12/1/07 (a highly significant date--I'll explain in a moment), Donald Rumsfeld urged "swift action" by the U.S. in support of "friends and allies" in South America. The Bushites don't have any "friends and allies" in South America, except the fascist torturers, mass murderers and drug traffickers running Colombia, and USAID-NED and covert budget funded fascist cabals
within Venezuela, Bolivia, and probably Ecuador and others (Argentina, likely--government allied with Chavez and the Bolivarians--and there was a big oil find there, recently). "Swift action" by the U.S. can only mean one thing--military action. So, which of these situations will produce such action before Bush leaves office?
Rumsfeld published his op-ed on the very weekend that two FARC hostages were to be released, as the result of Chavez's hostage negotiation efforts
at the request of the Colombian government, and the personal request of Bush tool, Alvaro Uribe. Rumsfeld says, in paragraph one, that Chavez's efforts were "not welcome in Colombia," but they had been days before. Chavez had taken the request seriously, and was succeeding. Uribe then (as that weekend approached) abruptly withdrew the request, and BOMBED the location of the two hostages, as they were in route to Caracas, driving them back on a 20 mile hike into the jungle, back into captivity. This incredible treachery smells of Rumsfeld. And I think the plan was to hand Chavez a diplomatic disaster, with dead hostages. (There may have been a rehearsal involving a mysterious group of shooters, who attacked a FARC camp and targeted and killed all the hostages who were present, about six months earlier.)
Despite additional efforts by Uribe to sabotage hostage releases, Chavez managed to get those two hostages out safely, a few weeks later, and eventually got a total of six released. Between the first and second releases, the president of France, other world leaders, and the hostages' families, all begged Chavez to continue his efforts, despite Uribe's lack of cooperation and treachery. And the presidents of Ecuador and Argentina also became involved. There was hope that these hostage releases by Colombia's leftist rebels would lead to a peaceful settlement of Colombia's 40+ year civil war--a war that is a major headache for Venezuela and Ecuador, resulting in thousands of poor Colombian refugees flooding into their countries, mostly fleeing the horrendous atrocities against innocent people committed by the Colombian military and rightwing paramilitaries. The president of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, was working on release of Ingrid Betancourt (a French/Colombian citizen, and former leftist candidate for president of Colombia), and was in "very advanced negotiations" with the FARC's chief hostage negotiator, Raul Reyes, in the last week of Feburary.
On March 1, the Colombian military--using high tech U.S. surveillance and U.S. "smart bombs" (and possibly U.S. aircraft and personnel)--blew Reyes' camp away, killing Reyes and 24 others, at a location just inside Ecuador's territory. Colombian soldiers then crossed the border to shoot any survivors. The Ecuadoran military found bodies in their pajamas shot in the back. The camp had been asleep. Among the dead was one Ecuadoran citizen and several visiting Mexican students (apparently there to participate in the humanitarian mission).
Having destroyed all hope for further hostage releases, and for peace, Uribe claimed to have seized laptops belonging to Raul Reyes, and proceeded to leak bits and pieces of their contents to the press, wildly overinterpreting them, to slander Chavez and Correa as "terrorist-lovers."
In hindsight, we can see the whole arc of this plot--from Uribe's initial request to Chavez, to drawing Reyes over the border into Ecuador (Reyes probably thought it would be a safer location for hostages releases, given Uribe's earlier attempt to bomb the hostages in Colombia, as they were released), encouraging increased contacts between FARC and Chavez and Correa--enticed by the prospects of hostage releases and peace. As heads of state, responsible for their countries' safety, Chavez and Correa would be derelict in their duties NOT to have
some contacts with the FARC. As Correa has said, his country does not border Colombia--it borders the FARC!" (The FARC controls about a third of Colombia's territory.) Hostage negotiations would greatly accelerate such contacts, and they would include bargaining. The docs, if they are real, include some wishful thinking, as to what FARC wants from Chavez or Correa. But there is no evidence--none!--that they ever gave FARC anything, aside from diplomatic help in releasing hostages.
An example of Uribe's wild over-interpretation: He construes the number "300"--used in connection with "a dossier"--to mean "$300,000" and makes it an accusation that Chavez gave FARC $300,000. But the number is far more likely referring to hostages. Further, Interpol--when Colombia gave them the laptops for inspection, later on--found that 48,055 files had been "accessed, created, modified or deleted" by the Colombian military, making the laptops useless as evidence of anything. Interpol very carefully avoided saying anything about the CONTENTS of the computers, and used non-Spanish speakers as analysts to insure this. They merely verified that the laptops belonged to Reyes, although how they did even that is still unclear.
The plot furthermore included Colombia/U.S. doing something so provoking--a bombing attack and invasion of Ecuador--as to invite retaliation and war. When that didn't work (Chavez talked Correa out of it--is my read on things--for which the president of Brazil, Lula da Silva, called Chavez "the great peacemaker), they then came up with the laptops.
Really, there is an evil mind behind all this--and, given Donald Rumsfeld's avid (and timely) interest in the matter, I can only think it's his. His "Office of Special Plans" (manufactured, cherry-picked intel; black ops) is alive and well in South America.
------------
*
"The Smart Way to Beat Tyrants Like Chávez," by Donald Rumsfeld, 12/1/07http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/30/AR2007113001800.html