I've been looking into some of these anti-environmental astroturf groups lately -- so when this latest story about perchlorate and the EPA came through, I naturally wondered if these guys were behind it.
http://www.councilonwaterquality.org/about/index.htmlThe Council on Water Quality is supported by a subset of the member companies of the Perchlorate Study Group, including Lockheed Martin, Aerojet, Tronox and American Pacific Corporation. In the past decade, the Perchlorate Study Group has worked cooperatively with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to increase scientific and medical understanding of perchlorate’s risk to human health.
http://www.environmentcalifornia.org/reports/clean-water/clean-water-program-reports/the-politics-of-rocket-fuel-pollutionThe Politics of Rocket Fuel Pollution
2006-12-1
For decades, tobacco companies have ignored evidence and distorted science in order to mislead the public and decision-makers, despite clear evidence that tobacco smoking is hazardous to public health. Now companies facing government action over rocket fuel pollution are deploying similar tactics. . . .
In 1992 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took the first steps toward requiring cleanup of perchlorate from drinking water. In response, a group of manufacturers and users of rocket fuel joined to form the Perchlorate Study Group (PSG), with the stated intention of helping EPA by providing scientific information.
However, documents from the internal files of participants in the PSG reveal that, much like the tobacco industry, these companies paid millions of dollars to fund misleading research and millions more to influence the scientific and public debate. . . .
The PSG supports an organization called the Council on Water Quality, including a prominent spokesperson (former California EPA director James Strock). The Council has consistently and publicly downplayed concerns about rocket fuel exposure. Deeper investigation reveals that:
* The Council on Water Quality is actually a project of the public relations firm APCO Worldwide;
* In 2004, the PSG paid APCO $770,000 to run this effort; and
* On behalf of Philip Morris, APCO has used similar front groups to challenge the use of science in policy-making and make it harder for citizens to sue corporations.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=APCO_WorldwideAccording to its website in 2004, APCO Associates (Worldwide) is a "global communication consultancy" specilalizing in "influencing decisionmakers and shaping public opinion by crafting compelling messages and recruiting effective allies."
Philip Morris hired APCO to organize the front group TASSC (The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition) in October, 1993 to help fight public health efforts to control Environmental Tobacco Smoke that occurred in the wake of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ruling that secondhand tobacco smoke was a Group A human carcinogen. APCO recommended that Philip Morris form a European TASSC group to: "Preempt unilateral action against the industry." . . .
APCO specializes in helping corporations advance their goals by manipulating legislators, and drafting and advancing model legislation and regulations. Key tools A&P uses include the creation of business coalitions and fake, corporate-funded "grassroots" groups tailored to specific issues.
(APCO has also worked for some of the world's nastiest dictators and registered last fall to promote a more favorable public image for Kazakhstan. See
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/07/0081591 for a whole lot more on APCO and its unsavory clients.)