Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sequoia Touch-Screen Voting Machines Subpoenaed in NJ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:53 PM
Original message
Sequoia Touch-Screen Voting Machines Subpoenaed in NJ
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 06:54 PM by BradBlog
Source: Star-Ledger, BRAD BLOG



Sequoia Touch-Screen Voting Machines Subpoenaed in NJ
Judge Orders Mandatory Testing of Machines After Company Previously Threatened Legal Action Against Princeton Professors if They Dared To Examine Machines...


Please note: The subpoenaed machines are the same failed Sequoia AVC Advantage touch-screen voting systems scheduled for use in Pennsylvania in the important upcoming Democratic Primary!


FULL DETAILS: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5880


Read more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5880
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's my voting machine! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Mine too and the sooner they get rid of them the better.
I have absolutely hated voting on the vapor machines in the 2006 election and the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. So.. Who's going to do the testing?
I hope it's that Princton Prof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. ...but why would they want to fix primaries . .. ???
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halliburtonsux Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here is the actual link, from nj.com
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/04/subpoenas_issued_to_reexamine.html

Subpoenas issued to re-examine voting machines by Diane C. Walsh/The Star-Ledger Tuesday April 08, 2008, 6:01 PM
Subpoenas were issued in six New Jersey counties today, demanding that officials turn over for testing all voting machines where discrepancies were found in the presidential primary tallies.

Election officials in Bergen, Gloucester, Mercer, Middlesex, Ocean and Union counties were instructed to turn over the machines by April 15. Activists trying to persuade Superior Court Judge Linda Feinberg that electronic voting machines should be discarded succeeded in convincing her that examining these counties' machines is critical to their case.

"In order to succeed in our case and show Sequoia machines are insecure and can be hacked into, we need to look at these machines," Venetis argued. Clerks in the six counties uncovered discrepancies in 60 machines when they doubled check the vote tallies after the Feb. 5 presidential primary.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. We've started to audit Essex results from Feb 5th, we have problems too
Edited on Tue Apr-08-08 10:46 PM by FogerRox
Meeting next week to plan strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do all of these touch-screen voting machine subpoenas mean
...that we may see voting back on punch cards or even paper ballots come November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Not touch screens, these are older push buttons designed in the early 1980's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Punch cards, no. Paper BALLOTS, maybe. If we're lucky... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thank you--!! I'm in Union County . . .
And I continue to send this stuff along to my Mayor & Town Council --- silence so far ! --
and town newspaper Editor ---

Believe it or not, I don't think that the voters in NJ have really caught on to the entire meaning of this yet ---

Especially that these machines were being introduced during the mid-1960's --- !!!!

And then we wonder how America has been so destroyed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. No, the zilog (z-80) chip used in the Advantage is from 1978
8 mghz IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. No -- I didn't mean EXACTLY these machines . . .
Especially that these machines were being introduced during the mid-1960's --- !!!!

BUT computer voting was being introduced during the mid-1960's . . .

See: Votescam - The Stealing of America non-fiction by Jim & Ken Collier

These were two journalists in Florida who wanted to do a story on Florida elections and they
decided that one of them would run for office. Which they did.
On Election night they watched their tally remain constant and then a big increase ---
followed by "a computer breakdown." When the election coverage resumed, their votes went back
to the lower figure. They decided to investigate -- found how corrupt the system was even then --
and signed a book deal with a major publisher. However, when the books hit the bookstores,
they were suppressed --- taken off the shelves.

Their family keep a website going to inform the public --
and you can read or scan all of their book there ---

http://www.constitution.org/vote/votescam__.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Ginny Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Millions already wasted on these crap machines. NJ knew these machines
were a problem and spent the money anyway. I hate wasteful disrespect for our tax dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. 27 yr old computers, for top dollar, really obtuse concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Voting Machines in PA should be hauled off too.. I think they're rigged for Clinton and Rendell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Philly doesn't use the ones in the OP but use
these:

http://www.phillyelection.com/engweb.htm

Still, there are plenty of ways to screw with the election here like changing the polling place at the last minute, not delivering machines on time, broken machines, not opening the polling place on time, hiding machines in warehouses without tallying, incomplete voting rolls books, not having enough poll staff, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. State by state and county by county, we will get our country back!
This is very hopeful news. :bounce: Someone -- maybe Molly Ivins -- said, "George W. Bush is not stupid, but he thinks the American people are." And he is wrong again!

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Brad, not whellchair complaint


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. Rachel Maddow had one of the county clerks
responsible for certifying the results from these machines on her show about 3 weeks ago. the clerk said that she was told by the company that if she had these machines tested by the Princeton profs, they were going to sue the county and the profs. I'm so glad to hear this news, thanks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. See the full linked story...
...For details (and the actual emailed threat) from Sequoia. And much more. It's an amazing story. Trust me. Check it out, and don't miss the "Mike Gibbons/Kwaidan" part concerning the "blonde nymphomaniacs".

Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. Same machines probably gave
Bu$h victory in NM 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Election fraud as usual.
and people still blindly believe in this 2 party system.

The game is rigged folks

Ill give you all a hint on who wins in Nov. ............
The candidate who is a CFR member.
just sayin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
25. The company blames the poll workers for the discrepancies

Michelle Shafer, a spokeswoman for Sequoia in California, said her company would try to have the subpoenas quashed. But no motions were filed today with Superior Court Judge Linda Feinberg, who is presiding over the case in Trenton.

Sequoia maintained the errors found in the presidential primary were due to poll workers pushing the wrong buttons on the control panels. The company resisted calls for independent testing of the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC