Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blood Thinner Might Be Tied to More Deaths

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:43 AM
Original message
Blood Thinner Might Be Tied to More Deaths
Source: New York Times

Amid indications that more people may have died or been harmed after being given a brand of the blood thinner heparin, federal drug regulators said Thursday that they had found “potential deficiencies” at a Chinese plant that supplied much of the active ingredient for the drug.

Baxter International, which makes the brand of heparin associated with the problems, and buys supplies from the Chinese plant, announced that it was expanding a recall to include virtually all its heparin products. Though Baxter produces much of the heparin used in the United States, regulators said the other major supplier would be able to meet the demand.

The Food and Drug Administration said the number of deaths possibly associated with the drug, made from pig intestines, had risen to 21 from 4. But it cautioned that many of those patients were already seriously ill and that the drug might not have caused their deaths.

The F.D.A. emphasized that it had yet to identify the root cause of the problem, and that it had not concluded that the Chinese plant was responsible. The agency also said it was investigating two Chinese wholesalers — also called consolidators — that supplied crude heparin to the Chinese plant, Changzhou SPL, as well as those that sold raw ingredients to the consolidators.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/us/29heparin.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin



So, I repeat, globilization helps me how? (I am still waiting for an adequate answer.) Toys and lead were bad enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Toys and lead were bad enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least it wasn't any of those "dangerous" Canadian drugs...
I'd like to see the little Repiggies make that assertion again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Right on
I remember Dr. Dean's response to those idjits who called Canadian medicines pond scum.

"Do you really believe Canadian parents give their children bad medicines?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama or Hil would do well to speak to these kinds of
issues. The American people want answers.

I heard yesterday that dentists import most of their materials for making crowns etc from, you guest it...China- and, that this is now a concern. Having some of these toxins placed permanently in your mouth.:bounce:

I check the label on everything I buy now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. and yet there goes McCain campaigning on the need for fewer regulations on corps
in his lower taxes rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer99 Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another reason we the people ought to tell business that
stuff will be made in America where we the people can control the safety of our goods. The worship of free trade and unbridled competiton is the root of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Problem with that approach is that it is exactly the same...
...sort of restriction, which limits your source of supplier.

Better approach would be to make them absolutely responsible for guaranteeing the safety of the product supplied, as if they'd produced the product themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC