Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force: B-2 stealth bomber crashes on Guam; both pilots ejected safely, in good condition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
General Zod Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:12 PM
Original message
Air Force: B-2 stealth bomber crashes on Guam; both pilots ejected safely, in good condition
Source: Associated Press - February 22, 2008 11:03 PM ET


HAGATNA, Guam (AP) - The Air Force says a B-2 stealth bomber crashed on Guam, but the pilots ejected safely.

The Air Force says Friday the pilots are both in good condition. Emergency responders are on the scene at Andersen Air Force Base on Guam.

A board of officers will investigate the crash.

Read more: http://www.whbf.com/Global/story.asp?S=7914006&nav=0zGo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there any reason for having B2's in the air anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex1775 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They make good first strike weapons platforms...
I'd rather have a couple of B-2's bouncing around then the dozens of B-52's that used to be in the air 24/7 during the 80's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. DO mean like, we use them in Iraq, and what the hell are we doin in there anyway..
SO thusly what the frick are the B-2's doin in the air anymore ?

The B-2 is a great back up to black/special ops. I'm sure they were just on a training mission. >wink<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Apparently
the USAF is dropping 4 500-pounders a day as opposed to 4 a week before the surge. 500-pounders are called blockbusters, used to destroy cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. 500 pound bombs are not "blockbusters"
A 500 pound bomb is about an average size bomb. The biggest bombs I know of, that have been used, were used in WWII and weighed 22,000 pounds. That's 44 times the weight of your "blockbuster"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. You really have no idea what you're talking about
500-pound bombs are not "blockbusters" and are nowhere near large enough to destroy cities. Even the largest non-nuclear bomb we have, which is 20,000 pounds, could only destroy a small section of a city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. "Blockbuster" refers to destroying about a city block
Enough of them could be said to be "used to destroy cities". Thousand bomber raids were not unknown in WWII. In practice, though, it was the incendiaries that did the major work in "city destroying" previous to the atom bomb (e.g. Dresden).

Blockbusters helped that along, by blowing roofs off houses and breaking gas lines, both of which helped to set fires.

I suppose a 500 pound bomb would take out a few houses, but not a whole block.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockbuster_bomb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. Not out of a B-2, they aren't
I guess that if you dropped a LOT of 500-lb bombs on a city you could destroy it, but you've basically got to use a C-5 as a bomber if you want to do it that way.

A GBU-43 "Massive Ordnance Air Burst" (because they can't call it the Mother of All Bombs in official Air Force documents, and that's what the troops were calling it at first) weighs 21,000 pounds, it's GPS-guided and dropped out of a cargo plane, and even it wouldn't destroy a city unless you used a lot of them or it wasn't a very big city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heliarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Russia has their bombers making long runs.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20189910/

Longer than they were. Everyone's flexing... Russia has naval operations around Iran now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Notice that the "pilots scrambled to greet them"

Somehow, Air Force jets can be scrambled to protect Guam. But we were incapable of scrambling jets to PROTECT OUR NATIONS CAPITOL on 9/11. It was either extreme incompetence or willfully allowing our country to be attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's nearly one billion dollars. I'm glad the crew survived. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another $2.1 Billion plane lost
Your tax dollars at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Your exchange rate must be reversed. The price was $1.2 billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Here's my source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-2_Spirit

The cost of the B-2 program in 1994 dollars was reported at $737 million per plane; however, the total cost of the program with development, spares, and facilities averaged over $2.1 billion per plane as of 1997 according to the B-2 program office.<1>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Do you count the price of your garage into the price of your car?
I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. When I'm paying for both and can't use either?
I sure as hell do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's about stupid. I count the value of my garage separate from my car.
My car comes and goes but the garage remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Your garage is built to accomodate many different types of cars. B-2 facilities -- only B-2's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. My car comes and goes too but rarely in the garage!
My garage seems to be for junk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. The 900 mil difference is just some washers and toilet seats anyway
when you are the Pentagon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Expensive crash
I wonder if there was anything more to it than simply an accident? That's a pretty strategic area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heliarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. And with russia flying bomber sorties as far as the bering strait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. I once calculated the cost of these things
and at that time they cost MORE than their weight in gold. Of course since Bush sank the dollar, that may no longer be the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. If made completely from solid gold, they would cost
today $2,387,948,800.

Given that the replacement for this one (should congress order it) would be between $1.2 and $2.1 B, it looks like they are safely worth a little less than their weight in gold. But not by a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. 2 Billion dollars!
There is a reason these aircraft aren't supposed to be flown around more than once or twice a year.

They are designed to face an impossible enemy who controls the skies and is at full war with the United States.

To put it into other terms from what it is rumored this is like a theoretical US bomber during WW2 that could have struck Nazi targets PERFECTLY DEEP within their most protected cities with theoretically more radar, night fighters, flak coverage than the soviet union at it's height. And not get scratched. A way to hurt badly an enemy who has surrounded you and is raining down arrows.

I dont want such a craft flying around Guam they need to be under constant loving care at home so that we wont be tempted to build more.

You know they will be screaming for a replacement now. With something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Which comes around to the question of why they're flying in the first place
Answer: to justify their existence. We're long past the notion that a strategic weapon is doing its job if it doesn't get used
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Was it raining?
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. In a first, $1.2 billion stealth crashes Sat Feb 23, 5:06 AM ET
HAGATNA, Guam - A B-2 stealth bomber plunged to the ground shortly after taking off from an air base in Guam on Saturday, the first time one crashed, but both pilots ejected safely, Air Force officials said.


The aircraft was taking off with three others on their last flight out of Guam after a four-month deployment, part of a continuous U.S. bomber presence in the western Pacific. After the crash, the other three bombers were being kept on Guam, said Maj. Eric Hilliard at Hickham Air Force Base in Hawaii.

At least one B-2 bomber had taken off safely from Andersen Air Force Base but was brought back when another aircraft plunged to the ground.

There were no injuries on the ground or damage to buildings, and no munitions were on board. Each B-2 bomber costs about $1.2 billion to build.

more:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080223/ap_on_re_us/b2_crash;_ylt=AtW3ybRqctB1bswsXqYgMI6s0NUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Babette Donating Member (810 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Here's the Guam Pacific Daily News link, with photo
http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080224/NEWS01/802240311

clip
"As smoke from fire billowed upwards over northern Guam after the crash, Marianne Blas of Yigo said a smell "like burning tires" wafted over her ranch just outside of Andersen. Blas said the stink was so strong it chased her and her husband out of the ranch, where planes fly overhead daily.
"We left and I felt like I needed to shower," she said.

Yesterday's accident was the second time an aircraft from Andersen has crashed in the last two weeks. On Feb. 12, a Navy EA-6B Prowler crashed into the water about 20 miles northeast of Ritidian Point. Three crew members were rescued by helicopters within a half-hour."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f the letter Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Stealth bomber crashes; pilots safe
Source: cnn... but still

The aircraft was taking off with three others on their last flight out of Guam after a four-month deployment, part of a continuous U.S. bomber presence in the western Pacific. After the crash, the other three bombers were being kept on Guam, said Maj. Eric Hilliard at Hickham Air Force Base in Hawaii.

At least one B-2 bomber had taken off safely from Andersen Air Force Base but was brought back when another aircraft plunged to the ground.

There were no injuries on the ground or damage to buildings, and no munitions were on board. Each B-2 bomber costs about $1.2 billion to build.
=====snip====

The rotations are designed to boost the U.S. security presence in the Asia-Pacific region while other U.S. forces diverted to fight in the Middle East.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/23/stealth.bomber.crash.ap/index.html



When i first read the article, it just said that the rotations are part of a 'permanent U.S. bomber presence in the western pacific'. Interesting the way they change these things so quickly..


By the way how much money and carbon-impact does it cost and have to fly bombers over the western pacific until judgment day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. a $1.2 BILLION warplane ... Hey, that's our money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Don't worry... the deductible is only $500
Thank goodness they switched to Geico. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. the pilots live to die another day for the military industrial complex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Thankfully it crashed on the GROUND!


I really liked those beaches next to Anderson great snorkeling I'd hate to see that reef destroyed by one of those environmental nightmares!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I'd worry more about prevailing winds
Burning composite resin from stealth planes is a very real health hazard. USAF has mishap guidelines for such things, I hope the firefighters are wearing their SCBAs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. shit. There goes $2 billion in health care dollars
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
36. At 2 Billion, that's bigger than the GDP of 32 Nations
Looking at a quick ranking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

I only hope it was some unpredictable mechanical error - no one would want to be the pilot or mechanic waking up every morning with that accident on their conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpikeTss Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
37. These 2 billion dollars are not important
The White House will close down some schools, cut funding of public services and additionally print some greenbacks and in no time anyone will remember the money lost in this crash.

Most importantly, some extremely rich guys in the industrial military complex will get even richer, which proves that our politicians are doing what they are being paid for.

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. The Feds cannot close schools
Schools in this counrty are the property of the States and individual juridictions. If schools are closed, it will because the state and local governments will not assume the responsibility to take the steps necessary to keep them open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC