Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Votes to Give Retroactive Immunity for Telecoms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:57 AM
Original message
Senate Votes to Give Retroactive Immunity for Telecoms
Source: Talking Points Memo

Senate Votes to Give Retroactive Immunity for Telecoms

By Paul Kiel - February 12, 2008, 11:19AM
Let there be no doubt: a majority of senators, and a large number of Democrats, think the telecoms should not suffer the hazard of accountability for cooperating with the administration's warrantless wiretapping program. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) took to the floor last night to give a speech asking, "This is our defining question, the question that confronts every generation: The rule of law, or the rule of men?" The resounding answer: the rule of men.

The Senate voted on the Dodd/Feingold amendment, which would have stripped retroactive immunity from the surveillance bill just now. The final tally was 31-67; crossing over to vote nay were Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Evan Bayh (D-IA), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Tom Carper (D-DE), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Jim Webb (D-VA), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Kent Conrad (D-ND), and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI). Update: Here's the official tally.

Presidential candidates Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Barack Obama (D-IL) were present for the vote – voting nay and yea, respectively.

Read more: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/senate_votes_for_retroactive_i.php


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fish rots from the head. That head is named Harry Reid.
Thanks a lot, Jim Webb, you effin sellout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I Spoke To His Office
And they told me he was against immunity. Wonder what deal he made with the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jkilvik Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Harry Reid is a weak tinkler
And those Senators who thought he was a good choice for ML should be questioned closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi, Why?
Not wanting to be a Conspiracy Theorist, I wonder why the Democrats selected Reid, and Pelosi for their positions. I guess standing up for Truth, and Justice is just not important enough to our Democratic Leadership. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
94. Words without deeds mean zip
He still might not have won, but he could have put up a lot better fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Are you saying we've been betrayed by Democrats in our own party?
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 02:03 PM by defendandprotect
About time that is said clearly ---

Now let's talk about the DLC and Republicans in the Democratic party --- PLEASE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. How much longer before we understand that the Democratic Party is betraying us --?
Not only Pelosi and Reid but many more ---

Including the 40 or more "blue dogs" which the DLC supports ---

and they are soliciting more of them to stand against liberals in the party!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. I think many have been getting the message, loud and clear,
especially since Nov. '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
90. The message was "loud and clear" two decades ago ---
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 05:06 PM by defendandprotect
and, obviously, the lack of any acknowledgment of this keeps Democrats from looking
at other ways to solve this problem ---

They keep "hoping" that the Democrats will perform --- !!!

There's no PLAN B no matter how many times you ask them ---

there is simply a large need among Democrats to hang on and deny what is so obvious.

Shhhhhhh --- don't talk about it ---!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. No Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. That's her standing up to the right wing smear machine.
Hiding under a rock during tough votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
93. She gave Bush what he wanted on Iraq and Iran
so why not join Bush in stomping on the Constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where was Hillary? (asked innocently by Connie_Corleone)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm sure she was there, maybe the vote log will show that?
Surely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. And as usual, you're wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Would her vote have mattered either way?
The votes had been counted before hand as they always are and the issue was resolved before any votes cast..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nope. But that never stopped the Hillary supporters from attacking Obama for the same thing.
I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It might matter to the people that are considering whether or not to vote for her.
Or support her should she get the nod. Clearly this was an important issue to the democratic base. We've been protesting, burning up phones lines, and jamming the tubes with email since it came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Some of her famous leadership ability might have helped.
Perhaps she's used it all up, or just never felt strongly about the issue? I would have liked to have seen more than just a vote from Obama, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. If she had Voted Yea, Yes!
If Senator Clinton had voted Yea, it would have helped decrease my feeling that she is a loyalist to the corporations. I am the President of a Corporation, and I will say this, not being Rich, Republican, nor Connected, I do not think that My Corporation, nor Myself have the same rights that the Rich, Republican, nor Connected Have! End injustice. Justice is the nectar that gives people hope about their government, without it the people dispair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
97. Uh, if she'd voted yes, it sure would.
Heck, a no vote would have been a good thing in and of itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. AWOL - Campaigning in Texas!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Clinton (D-NY), Not Voting
Hmmm... wonder why that could be:

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2369

Today, Obama is throwing down the gauntlet on internet freedom, telecom lobbyists, and on opening up government in general to the public. It's some genuinely radical stuff, and it includes the use of blogs, wikis, and openness in government hearings. Significantly, Larry Lessig has endorsed Obama's platform.

----

And then of course there is spectrum and net neutrality. Both Edwards and Obama have made it clear they will break the power of the wireless gatekeepers, the telecom lobbyists who gut our laws, and the Comcast traffic shaping tyrants. Clinton, though, has been a noted absence in the debate about spectrum, mumbling about it incoherently at Yearlykos, and her plan for broadband was written by the telcos and doesn't include net neutrality. She still hasn't come out clearly on retroactive immunity, as her campaign's ties to telecom lobbyists are not trivial, and it looks from her possible FCC choices that her administration would be a continuation of the Clinton-Bush years of media and telecom deregulation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Thank God!
Obama is right about another issue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Has anyone noticed...
That the day before he votes not to strip, Jim Webb comes out with some hard-hitting something or other that he knows will tamp down criticism of the Dem base? And that he seems to use this tactic a lot, to cover up his votes?

Something tells me that the honorable senator from Virginia is using a little bait and switch on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Many people around here are fooled by Webb...
The guy is very conservative. His concern about Iraq has nothing to do with the morality of the war, but only his well intentioned desire to 'help the troops'. He has seized on a populist messages and has been riding it ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. I'm sure you'd be much happier if George Macaca Allen had won
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. He'd probably be the GOP nominee by now...
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:50 PM by Virginia Dare
and we'd be facing Senator Gilmore in his place. Scary thought isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
43. As a Virginian, I have to say I was never fooled by him..
I figured he would vote with Repubs on some issues, but actually he hasn't that often.

At any rate, I'd much rather have HIM in there than that racist ass Macaca Allen, who I know would NEVER have voted with the Dems on ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
87. getting a guy in with D behind his name is not always best
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #87
102. Yes It Is From Virginia. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NikolaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. Yup
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:48 PM by NikolaC
Just like I regret voting for Clinton in 2000 based upon her voting record, I regret voting for Webb primarily because of his FISA votes :mad:. Three words that are desperately needed in the US political system come to mind: CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. you regret voting for webb. So I guess you regret that Allen lost
Tells me everything I need to know about you, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NikolaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. No I Do Not
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 02:04 PM by NikolaC
Allen was a racist piece of dung. What I regret was that there were no other real Democrats that were put forward to run against him. I voted for the lesser of evils, once again. I have this nasty little habit of regretting voting for someone when I find that their votes were counter to the will of the American people who put them in their jobs in the first place. I am entitled that right. Spare me your Allen sarcasm.

Edited to add that you know NOTHING about me. I am an African American woman and resent the insinuation in your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Elections are zero sum games, as I've said before
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 02:13 PM by onenote
If you regret voting for one candidate, then you essentially are implicitly supporting the other. It sucks, but its the way it is.

If you had said...gee I wish a different Democrat had been running and defeated Allen, I wouldn't have had any reason to post. But that's not what you said. You said you regretted voting for Webb (not that you didn't have another choice).

I suggest you choose your words more carefully to make sure they represent what you are trying to say. And taking those words to heart, let ME be clearer than I was in my post.When I said your post told me what I needed to know about you, I didn't mean to suggest you supported Allen or were racist, although I now see how that might be how you read it. I meant it to say that it told me that you were one of a growing (seemingly) number of DUers suggesting that they'd rather not vote for a Democrat if that Democrat didn't live up to some unattainable standard of perfection. But my apologies for not being more clear about that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NikolaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. Okay, Maybe I Should Have Been More Literal In My Post
I understand that there is no such thing as a "perfect" Democrat. However, when they approve and vote for some of the worst policies of the current administration, I cannot defend their actions and will not do so. I believe that there are Democrats out there that would make a great Senator, Congressperson and President but they have a hard time raising the funds needed to run a successful campaign. That is one of the reasons why I believe that Campaign Finance Reform is essential, more and better choices in candidates that way. I am tired of settling for the lesser of two evils, but the way that the system is set up right now offers us very few choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimbot Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. Not quite zero sum.
If you look at McCain and the right wing radio conservatives in the short term its a zero sum game for them.

--if they don't vote, they are putting a Democrat in the White House.

However, in the long term, it is far from zero sum.

--if they don't vote in large enough numbers and McCain gets trounced in the general election, they then influence the party to nominate a more conservative (according to their definition of conservative) candidate in the future.

The reality is that we don't know if a more conservative candidate would be good or bad for the repubs in the long term but I'm just trying to illustrate that it is not zero-sum

Back to Allen...personally, I think Webb was the right person to run against him and dethrone one of the heir apparents to the republican presidential nomination...I am still not a fan of his, but short-term and long-term, I think it is probably good for our party and for Virginia that he won.

--JT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. DARN straight ...
Not every pol has to fall completely in line with the party ...

Well, I guess it works that way with the Rs, but our team just does not work that way ...

Allen was H O R R I B L E .. And, if you look at the current presidential field, you have to believe he would be the nominee today, and if not, he still would be a mindless republican slug in the senate ...

I live in Pa, and the very same thing goes for Santorum ... Casey is one step ahead of a slug, but Santorum was a freakin maniac, and again, would have been a much stronger R presidential candidate ...

Even knowing today that Casey is ... well ... not great shakes ... I sleep better knowing it ain't Santorum ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #59
101. Unattainable standard of perfection my ass...
Why don't they vote to preserve are fucking freedoms and rule of law? Is that really too fucking much to ask? Fuck you and the horse you rode in on you sanctimonious prick.

BTW: I voted McCaskill and I regret it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
98. What fucking simplistic thinking.
Your false dichotomy is ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
89. Those 3 words are what stands between all of us
and democracy. Campaign Finance Reform as in PUBLIC financing - Clean Money - is the no. 1 issue facing us now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
49. Write to Senator Webb, and Others.
The only way is to keep at these Representatives, and Senators, and to work to move towards a Democratic Party based on Equal Justice for All. I know that it is hard to be on the side of Justice. The fact is that unless our Representatives, and Senators fight for what is right. We as a nation will fail. I am very disappointed with Sen. Webb on this. I e-mailed him last night about something positive. Now, I will e-mail him tonight about something negative. Out of these Democrats voting Nay, only Rockerfeller did not surprise me. Rarely does he ever support issues of equal justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
72. Voinovich, OH-R does the same thing.
Prior to a vote he cries for the TV and then when he thinks we aren't watching, votes the other way. We have lived with this for many years. He is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of the corporations, by the corporations, etc. etc. etc.
Everyone who didn't vote Yes on Dodd/Feingold should just go on a list of "Corporate Sellouts, Not to be Trusted" right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. What happened to Dodd's Filibuster?
I thought he was going to continue to Filibuster this? Even the old fashioned way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Guess he forgot.
Now we know what all his tough talk signified. Sound and fury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. Cloture was successfully invoked
Before you spout off, maybe actually take 30 seconds to educate yourself. You won't seem so foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. No filibuster. None. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
54. 40 votes are needed for a filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks again, Feinstein...
you steaming pile of shit. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. DiFi = DINO. Fuck her....I wish to hell we had two REAL Dem...
...U.S. Senators from my state. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
82. Fuck you DI FUCKING FI!
God I hate her more and more very fucking day. To think I ever voted for her is a shame I will live with the rest of my life. FUCK YOU DI FI!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
rec this to the top of the greatest page so everyone can see the names of those who sold us out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. follow the $
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. What a surprise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. although I'm voting for the Dem nominee, this is what makes it impossible for me to register "Dem"
once again, as I was in my youth.

Before they started their first series of routine sellouts, in the Reagan era.

I just cannot bring myself to willingly join the enablers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. I will go to city hall tomorrow and change my affiliation to independent
as it was before the * Holocaust. If enough of us do this it will shoot a cannon ball cross their bow. I was planning on voting for the dem candidate but I now have, over this one very important issue, changed my mind and will vote for Edwards in the GE as I did in the primary and so will all my friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. self delete wrong place.
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:29 PM by ooglymoogly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. well certainly, if enough of us became independents, *that* might get them to, at last, notice
and of course, we could still vote for the occasional worthwhile Dem in fall elections...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
76. I meant to self delete this post because of the misleading info
on Obamas vote....He voted correctly in my opinion on both issues and for NO immunity. I will vote for Obama in the GE. If he had, as some posters have suggested, voted for immunity it would have invalidated everything he is standing for but he did not. The striking thing is Hill was nowhere to be seen and that is a statement in itself. She can now posture in any wind that blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desertflamingo Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
86. amen!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's like a bad dream.
My daughter was reading "1984" the other day. Just in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Stabenow Is Dead to Me
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 12:59 PM by Demeter
This is not her first foray off the reservation. She's a DLC Borg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. You will be assimilated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
62. Don't Think So. They've Tried for 50+ Years Now and Haven't Won Yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
73. Stabenow votes with Republicans to cover Bush's lying ass.
This is ridiculous. Stabenow predictably crossed over to vote with the Repubs on the issue of telecoms having retrocative immunity for breaking the law on Bush's illegal wiretapping program. Thanks to her and some other D's crossing over to vote with the R's, they got their immunity.
This is the last straw for Stabenow. I wish I had saved the response I had gotten from her office a few days ago. I had written senator@stabenow.senate.gov about the wiretap immunity issue. They sent back a vague response making it seem like she was on my side. Of course, just like other issues in the past (habeus corpus, etc.), the real vote came in and she continues to be a D who votes like a R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biglake Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #73
92. Agree-Stabenow is a sell out- did it on bankruptcy bill too-
I am horrified at this woman who votes for big corporations and now to shield Bush. Shameful hypocrisy- just like she did on the bankruptcy bill. We see who owns their votes. Now, I know better here in Michigan and will look for another to represent my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Welcome to Fascist America
where even some of our own democrats are selling the American soul away to the elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. All the usual suspects and a few more that have just blown their
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:37 PM by ooglymoogly
cover. I wash my hands of all those Benedict Arnolds who voted for criminal immunity and the people of this country and will make a dartboard of them. This vote is proof to me that there is the Republican party of Luddites and the Democrat arm of the Republican party who talk a good talk but walk a very crooked walk to hoodwink democrats and that is all we have. True Dem's are becoming an endangered species decimated by a complicit republican press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. Jesus Help Us?
Can you believe: "The Senate voted on the Dodd/Feingold amendment, which would have stripped retroactive immunity from the surveillance bill just now. The final tally was 31-67; crossing over to vote nay were Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Evan Bayh (D-IA), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Tom Carper (D-DE), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Jim Webb (D-VA), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Kent Conrad (D-ND), and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI). Update: Here's the official tally.

Presidential candidates Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Barack Obama (D-IL) were present for the vote – voting nay and yea, respectively."

At least Barack voted Yea!!!!!!! I am going to contact all the Democrats that voted Nay. Justice means voting for justice. How can we have justice when immunity is given to corporation which behave illegally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. obama voted to give them immunity???? where is the outrage on this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. self delete for obvious reasons
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:51 PM by ooglymoogly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. me too! talk about traitors to the democratic party! obama is a bigtime traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Read post 45.
Your outrage is misplaced. He voted to YEA to strip them of their immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. Obama voted in yea in favor of stripping immunity from the bill
Save your outrage for Clinton, who didn't bother to vote at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. Obama voted YEA to a "stripping Telecoms of immunity" amendment
A very good vote.

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NikolaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
52. No
Obama voted yea on the Dodd-Feingold amendment which would have stripped telecom immunity from the FISA bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
79. I Would Like To See A Comparison Of Obama and Clinton Voting Since He
became a U.S. Senator. How do I find this out? Thanks in advance for any help you can give me.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #79
91. i know it has to be out there. probably senate.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #36
106. LIE.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
53. We couldn't even afford to pay the phonebills for the wiretaps on the REAL criminals!
The Telecoms were DISCONNECTING GOVERNMENT WIRETAPS ON ACTUAL CRIMINALS FOR NON-PAYMENT!!!!

Not only are they trying to drink from a fire hydrant, we can't even afford to pay for all the water!

WHAT THE FUCK, MAN!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
58. Senator Harry Reid Democratic Majority Leader (202) 224-3542
US Senate switchboard
(202) 224-3121

Internet Congress public contact resources
www.congress.org/congressorg/home/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
61. O No, the telecoms 'shouldn't suffer' - ONLY THE PEOPLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
63. At least my senator, Bob Casey, voted yes on the Dodd amendment.
Casey was the Dem we supported, even though he's conservative on some issues, to make sure & get rid of Santorum. I was a Webb supporter from afar, tha's gotta sting for folks in Virginia, this vote. I despair of ever having a majority of real Democrats in Congress again. What are these people thinking?? Are they so in thrall to the money interests, is that the reason???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
65. Damn that Herb Kohl. God I wish someone would run against him
And now we have 5 more years of this traitor. And I want a Dem to run against him...not Lorge!

Salazar...what a huge disappointment he has been. Of course, the list contains the usual suspects too: the Nelson Twins, Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln, and Inouye. What on earth is up with McCaskill and Johnson?

Of note, Clinton didn't bother to show up for the vote. Guess I know where the rights of Americans stand with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
66. Can't wait until my telephone rings for the next DNC/DLC fundraising call
Can't wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
67. Grouped By Vote Position

YEAs ---31
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Casey (D-PA)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV) <------
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Tester (D-MT)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)


dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
68. Guess those Dems
reached across the aisle again dammit. I am so sick of this. I would rather they fight and no bill be passed than compromise our rights.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcgindydem Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
69. Democratic letdown
Two things I would like add 1 our anger is misplaced we should be going after Bush for authorizing the illegal wiretaps thats where I find fault with the democratic party. I don't think any company would refuse to do as the telecoms did under the circumstances and full pressure of the exec branch Conyers needs to start impeachment proceedings if not outright criminal investigation of herr bush. 2 Evan Bayh is from my state and everyone here knows that he's a republicant to the core, but for some reason Dem's in the state wont pull support from him .. spineless a@@holes makes me want more and more to change my affiliation to independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #69
83. Qwest refused.
They needed a FISA court approval. They did not get any contracts for doing the lawful thing. The rest of them got paid to break the law and now don't have to suffer any consequences. Welcome to the United Fascist States of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #69
84. Qwest refused.
They needed a FISA court approval. They did not get any contracts for doing the lawful thing. The rest of them got paid to break the law and now don't have to suffer any consequences. Welcome to the United Fascist States of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
71. Clinton - Not Present. Obama - Present and Voting YES. There's your answer for the best candidate!
Clinton stands up for CORPORATE INTERESTS, while Obama stand-up against them. Clinton can't be bothered to vote against fascist rule.

CLINTON IS A REPUKE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrypoet Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
74. Worthless
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 03:12 PM by angrypoet
Where the hell is the backbone of the Dem party? I am again disappointed by Jim Webb's voting record on FISA. I have expressed my opinion to his office before with not so much as a "thank you for your concern" letter back. I have very little respect for him. I consider this the most important issue of record, our civil liberties should be of the highest concern.

I am only encouraged by the vote by Obama. Only reinforces the reason that I voted for him today in VA. :patriot:

How about that Clinton...way to be there...the only Dem not on record. Good job. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
77. So My Question IS
What is the US Military fighting for? Because it sure as hell isn't fighting for our freedoms, because while they die in Iraq and Afghanistan the US Congress is trying to gut the US Constitution. So far they have been pretty successful at it, with the Patriot Act, Homeland Security, Military Commission System, and the Protect America Act, and still the US Military fails to defend us from the traitors within while fighting people who with a few exceptions are really fighting for their country.

This is how Bin Laden has won, he knew what kind of man Bush was and played George like a fiddle. Our military forces are slowly being decimated, with the exception of the USN and USAF, who will eventually be providing more personnel for land operations, our creditors are getting bolder, and are adversaries, China and a resurgent Russia are becoming good friends.

The congress sells us out, the military is constanly screwed by this civilian government, and we the people will soon have no say.

Welcome to Amerika

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
78. So My Question IS
What is the US Military fighting for? Because it sure as hell isn't fighting for our freedoms, because while they die in Iraq and Afghanistan the US Congress is trying to gut the US Constitution. So far they have been pretty successful at it, with the Patriot Act, Homeland Security, Military Commission System, and the Protect America Act, and still the US Military fails to defend us from the traitors within while fighting people who with a few exceptions are really fighting for their country.

This is how Bin Laden has won, he knew what kind of man Bush was and played George like a fiddle. Our military forces are slowly being decimated, with the exception of the USN and USAF, who will eventually be providing more personnel for land operations, our creditors are getting bolder, and our adversaries, China and a resurgent Russia are becoming good friends.

The congress sells us out, the military is constanly screwed by the civilian government, and we the people will soon have no say.

If I didn't know better, I'd say that congress is intentionally stopping the troops from being withdrawn.

Welcome to Amerika

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
80. Is there really any difference between democrat or
a republican congress???

So far I haven't seen any
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dommyluc Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
81. Is this unconstitutional?
I am not an expert on Constitutional law, but I thought it was forbidden to grant immunity for crimes not yet committed. Am I correct in my thinking, and if it is forbidden by the Constitution, is some person or group going to file a lawsuit to prevent this law from going into effect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milord Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
85. retroactive immunity
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 04:40 PM by milord
Absolutely disgraceful! We are losing our country to the conscienceless right-wing whores. The Democrats are just as bad as the Republicans. This is shameful. It makes me ashamed of my country, of which I used to be proud, back when JFK was our president. How far we have sunk since then. If the Founding Fathers could see the current group of miscreants now running (ruining) our country, they would probably have them up in front of a firing squad. Come to think of it, that's not a bad idea, although perhaps a trifle harsh.
Well, maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
88. Bill Nelson, King of Florida. First he stripped us of our vote, now
our privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
95. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
96. Disgusting. Really. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
99. it's official . . . no one will ever be held accountable for the crimes committed . . .
by the Bush administration and their corporate masters . . . not now, now after November, not ever . . . the corporatocracy can do what they wish to whomever they wish, with no fear of reprisal . . .

just when you thought they couldn't sink any lower . . . :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
100. Fuck the ruling class and how many still want Webb for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
103. Repulsive. Absolutely sickening.
I swear to God we're watching the final days of our Democracy.




:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
104. Brutal. And these are the people who will be casting superdelegate votes
to determine the Democratic nominee, over the voice of the people.

Screwed. Absolutely screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
105. This was a landmark vote
I thought Congress had an oversight function. Apparently not.

Now we'll never know the extent of Bush's warrantless surveillance program.

Shame on the lapdog Rupubs, the spineless Harry Reid and all the "Lieberman Dems" who voted against accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
107. Feingold...
....for Senate Leader. He is just about the only one that I trust to do the right thing and not back down. Reid and Pelosi have to go. I wish the blogs would come together on this and show these sellouts what the consequences of so much weakness and not listening to their constituents is. Throw these bums out and get effective leadership to represent us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
108. With friends like this---Dem majority---who needs enemies?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
109. Bush has picture of Reid, Foley, Pelosi, and Larry Craig in the stall at the capital bulilding
Nancy has the wide-stance, Reid is signaling under the door, and Craig is giving it to them but good.

That's the only excuse I can think of. I hate these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
110. of course they did. have we come to expect anything else?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC