Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Medicare trend raises eyebrows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:15 PM
Original message
Medicare trend raises eyebrows
Source: LA Times

Employers are shifting costs -- and more burden -- to a federal program, critics say.
By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

February 11, 2008
WASHINGTON -- Many large employers are struggling with the obligation to cover the rising medical costs of retirees, but last year officials in Michigan found a way to save at least $40 million on care for retired teachers and other public-school workers: Send the bills to Washington.

Almost overnight, by taking advantage of a little-understood feature of Medicare, the school retirement system shifted a big chunk of the healthcare costs of more than 100,000 retirees off its budget and onto the federal government. This year, the state is shifting its civil service retirees too.

Michigan is not alone. Across the country, state and local government agencies, big nonprofit organizations and major corporations are rushing to do the same. One result is that the Medicare trust fund is evaporating even faster than expected.

At the heart of what critics say is a major cost-shifting maneuver is a program called Medicare Advantage, which pays private insurers a bonus to take over Medicare coverage for seniors.


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-medicare11feb11,1,2292807.story?ctrack=1&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, what a loophole.
I had no idea that states could do this.

The second issue (your last paragraph) is really a totally different issue. This has been going on for a very long time. They have farmed-out the management of "care" to private companies for many medicare participants. Our biggest single-payer is really just paying everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. "pays private insurers a bonus"
Words that should NEVER be included in a Gov. health plan! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. But...but.....but,,,aren't businesses against
gubmint intrusion into their affairs and against gubmint programs as a waste of tax money, yaddayaddayadda........oh, wait. Silly me, I forgot. They're only against it when the little guy benefits, not when THEY benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The only business's against Single Payer Universal care
are the Health Insurers. Imagine how much less of a headache 99% of the business's, big and small, would have if they took Health Coverage out of the equation and their books.

Of course the Drug companies are against it too because they know how much harder it would be to shaft Uncle Sam than Average Joe.

It would help the rest though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Imagine how much less headache DOCTORS would have
if there was a single payer system.

A friend of mine who has an orthopedic office with a few locations around the metro area has SEVEN full-time staff members who handle the insurance matters/clearance for patients.

I was told by his wife a few years ago that if he (the doctor) knew it was "going to be like this" he NEVER would've gone into the profession. He truly would like to just focus on 'healing/helping people'.

I don't know how much the AHA (American Hospital Association) has played into this....but my sis, an MBA who used to work for them said back in the 80's that "Doctor's are terrible business wo/men" and the AHA set about to 'help' them in this endeavor (to be better business wo/men). I don't know if this has been a good thing or not. Sure, doctors deserve to earn a decent (more than 'decent') living for all of their training/knowledge/hard work.....but I also don't like them BEING FORCED ALMOST to look at me like a "profit center" (how can I make money off this patient) ~ while at the same time 'helping' me.

It puts Doctors in a very "difficult" position. Some have more morals than others. Some may have 'almost none'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. My ...
a doctor who truly would like to just focus on 'healing/helping people'. That's what I'm looking for in a doctor - of whatever kind. It's hard to find and I'm glad to hear they *ARE* out there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonicmedusa Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And we, the consumer, pay for the salaries of those seven workers
Through higher office call fees.

Single payer cannot happen soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Then tell him to get off his duff and
try to change the AMA's policy against single-payer, or ANY form of universal health care. The AMA's opposition has been formidable and too many doctors have bought into their bullshit. While he's at it, he can try to get the majority of his colleagues who agree with the AMA policy to join him.

Trying to find a doctor who'll take you if you don't have insurance is an almost impossible task nowadays. Then when you do find them you have to pay upfront before they'll even look at you, no matter what your problem is.

The only way Medicare and Medicaid were finally able to be implemented was when the AMA realized that they could actually make more money with the programs in place and dropped their formidable opposition, which had been the main thing holding up the implementation for years. So maybe if we put it in terms doctors can understand, which is that they'll actually make more money with single-payer, they just might get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Why do you think Hubby's for a national health care system?
He's an internist here in Michigan, and he's sick and tired of all the business crap. He was let go from his last practice because he refused to join the practice, preferring to stay staff so he doesn't have to worry as much about the business side, and now his new practice is totally cool with him just treating people.

A great resource for figuring out billing and insurance hassles, though, is the magazine Medical Economics. Hubby and I do read that one, since it has great articles on working more efficiently and how to get Medicare to pay for stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. It's not businesses that shifted the costs, it's public schools and state govt
Reread the article; it's an important distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. medicare for all -- yay! -- ok that said -- we need to graduate
doctors from school without the huge debts they have switching to single-payer, universal healthcare.

with their workloads -- doctors, nurses and others need to make a good living{yes, as do we all}.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. some doctors are quietly refusing to
take anything but straight medicare...
if you singed up for one of those medicare hmos they wont see you - so doctors are more or less beginning to do their bit towards signle payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC