Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. money for Russia is linked to Iran nuclear plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:06 PM
Original message
U.S. money for Russia is linked to Iran nuclear plant
Source: International Herald Tribune

WASHINGTON: The U.S. Energy Department is subsidizing two Russian nuclear institutes that are building key parts of a reactor in Iran that the United States spent years trying to stop, according to a House committee.

The institutes, both in Nizhny Novgorod, gave U.S. officials sales presentations describing their capabilities, and listing the Bushehr reactor, which Russia has agreed to fuel, as one of their projects. One institute is providing control systems, including control room equipment, and the other is providing hundreds of pumps and ventilation fans.

The Energy Department is subsidizing the institutes under the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention, a program set up after the collapse of the Soviet Union to prevent newly impoverished scientists and their institutions from selling their expertise to states that might be developing nuclear weapons. The United States supplements the salaries of scientists, and pays overhead at those institutes, among others.

It was not immediately clear if the Energy Department was paying the salaries of the scientists involved in the Bushehr reactor. Representative John Dingell, chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Bart Stupak, chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee, asked that question in a letter sent Wednesday to Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.

"What policy logic justifies DOE funding Russian institutes which are providing nuclear technology to Iran?" the letter asked, referring to the acronym for the Department of Energy. "How does this advance our nonproliferation goals?"

...snip..

In a statement, Dingell, a Democrat of Michigan, said "only this administration would complain about proliferation in Iran, as part of President Bush's axis of evil, and then finance it with American taxpayer dollars." Stupak called it "schizophrenic foreign policy."

--------------------



Read more: http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=9808379





It's called planting/encouraging the evidence to justify WWIII. I'll bet Saddam Hussein might have a story or two to add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. If true, then time to cut the allowance, doncha thank?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not to mention Halliburton helped build them, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Your tax $$ at work - as administered by republicans.
Orwell must be laughing his ass off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Quite the earmark, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. hahaha..
HOw about THAT shit.

Kinda like how our money that goes to Saudi Arabia ends up funding terrorist who hit us afterwards.

Or how the monsters we create to fight our proxy wars later become the leaders of terrorist groups who hate us.

KARMA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Or........perhaps policy is shifting to allow for living with a nuclear Iran.
Couldn't admit that openly if true, but definitely one possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. of course we'll have to live with a nuclear Iran
there are no workable military options. Military experts have already discussed this ad nauseum. We don't have the political, military, or economic strategies available to successfully stop Iran without massive consequences for us...and right now, our country is immersed in a major economic problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. ...interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC