Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court overturns Iraq war protester's (Cindy Sheehan) conviction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:20 PM
Original message
Court overturns Iraq war protester's (Cindy Sheehan) conviction
Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday overturned Iraq war protester Cindy Sheehan's conviction for demonstrating without a permit on the White House sidewalk in 2005 and ordered a new trial.

The unanimous three-judge panel ruled that Sheehan's conviction had been based on errors of law by the magistrate judge that eliminated the prosecutor's burden to show her criminal intent.

Sheehan had been assessed a $50 fine and $25 administrative fee following the trial and conviction.

On September 26, 2005, Sheehan and four other members of an anti-war group approached the northwest gate of the White House and requested a meeting with President George W. Bush to discuss the Iraq war.

After they were turned down, they walked a short distance and sat down on the White House sidewalk. By this time, more than 200 other people had assembled to protest the Iraq war.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080111/pl_nm/usa_iraq_sheehan_dc_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ditto...good news! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. At least some judges will stand up for the rule of law
Not so sure about the jerk wads appointed by the assholes in power right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. and those appointed by their predecessors.
st ronnie stacked the courts pretty well. i still remember how hard it was to convince people that this was important. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. speaking of "what's important" - check out this article by Joe Bagaent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. Thank you for the link...

What a fabulous essay! Amazing that Tim Leary turns out to be so prescient...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yay! Mark one up for us! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Finally-some good judical news!
I'm very happy for Ms. Sheehan and the other victims of intimidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good for her! Too bad our legal system has turned into a war between real judges...
and federalist society Bush buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Isn't this battle the real Reagan legacy
of St. Ronnie packing the courts with neocons that were indoctrinated at Liberty U. and Patrick Henry? Raygun (or at least his puppeteers) were "right" about where the real power lays. We've been paying for this since 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh good, a new trial
Glad our priorities are straight here (how about a 'mistrial'). :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Yeah, double jeapordy?
Or did we lose that one in a signing statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Doesn't a "mistrial" also result in a new trial??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hooray for the appeals court!It's so unlikely they could actually prove "criminal intent,"after all.
It'll be good to get this stupid blotch off Cindy's record, won't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent.!!! Now she should sue the shit out of the DC police and the DA
and whatever constabulary that interfered with her constitutionally god given right to protest the policies of this fraudulent government and for arresting her and the rest so treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good for Cindy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Most excellent!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Some sanity prevailed! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah! The good guys and gals win for a change.
Arrest the arrestors instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. The effin' courts have been prone interpret anything that displeases the WH is criminal
intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. To even suggest that there's any 'criminal' intent in an obvious act of civil disobedience is lunacy
And to suggest that the prosecutor didn't even have to prove it is friken goofy.

Who was the judge? Alberto Gonzales in a wig and nose glasses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. GO CINDY!
Now let's get those wheels of justice grinding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. Go Cindy Go Gooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hooray for Cindy Sheehan and all war protesters
Fighting for freedom of speech is becoming a case of criminal intent nowadays. Hooray for the judges that overturned this as well, but ordering a new trial, gimme a break. The wheels of Justice need some grease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Excellent, and also a good example of the ridiculousness of Bushista ...
... their power manipulations and raw attemps to thwart people's Civil Rights have led to so many pointless arrests and court cases that they're almost solely responsible for the 'lawyer glut' and 'bottleneck in the court system' that Rethuglicans squeal about!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. A new trial ? I thought GOP stood for fiscal conservatism. A WASTE of taxpayer $ to harass Cindy
How much is this travesty of justice costing the US taxpayer ? Inquiring minds want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC