Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Afghanistan Surge (3,000 additional troops)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:48 PM
Original message
The Afghanistan Surge (3,000 additional troops)
Source: ABC News

Defense officials aren't calling it a surge, but it sure looks like one. The Pentagon is poised to send more than 3,000 additional troops to Afghanistan -- all of them Marines, ABC News has learned.

The plan is a sign that things are not going well in Afghanistan. Commanders say they simply do not have enough troops to deal with the increased threat.

"We are outmanned, across the board," one senior official told ABC News.

There are currently 26,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, the largest number since the start of the war.

...

Defense officials tell ABC News that General McNeill has said he needs a total of 7,500 additional troops in Afghanistan. But with the military stretched thin in Iraq, this is all he can expect to get for now, they said.

Read more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/rapidreport/2008/01/the-afghanistan.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I got the good news that my 19 year old nephew in the Army is not going to Iraq.
He is though going to Afghanistan, which is like out of the pot and into the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I have one about that age--but he is Army--. Keep them safe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ridiculous, that we are stretched so thin we don't have enough
ground troops to get the job done there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hells bells. And they want to take on Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Last I'd heard Gates was pushing NATO to commit more troops in Afghanistan.
He was doing it to relieve some stress on our troops. What happened?

Did NATO decline, or would there have been a greater increase of US troops had he not talked to NATO?

Does anyone know if Non-US NATO troops are increasing, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6.  Thousands more U.S. troops poised to go to Afghanistan
Source: CNN International

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Pentagon may send 3,000 Marines to Afghanistan in the coming weeks to reinforce the country's British-led sector ahead of an expected spring offensive by the Taliban and al Qaeda.

.....

"The request is based upon an anticipated spring offensive by the Taliban. They failed last time, and they will fail again this time, but commanders are seeking additional forces to ensure that," Morrell told CNN, signaling that the request is expected to be approved.

The Marines would be sent on a seven-month tour. It's considered a "major commitment" of forces, according to a Pentagon official. There are about 26,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, and the 3,000 additional forces would boost U.S. troop levels there to their highest point since the 2001 invasion.

.....

It's not known yet where the Marines will come from.

Under the proposal, the bulk of the Marines would go to southern Afghanistan, where British and Canadian forces have been in heavy combat for months.

Read more: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/01/09/marines.afghanistan/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Command in Afghanistan wanted 7500 troops but the best the Pentagon could do is 3,000
"military stretched to thin"...

Paraphrasing another article I read in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC