Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soldier Challenges "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:45 AM
Original message
Soldier Challenges "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy
Source: The Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Even if no one is asking, Army Sgt. Darren Manzella has been telling anyone who'll listen that he's gay.

So far, he's been without serious retribution from the military.

The Fort Hood medic, who served in Iraq and Kuwait, has admitted his sexual orientation in national media interviews and again today in a Washington.

"This is who I am. This is my life," said Manzella, who received a combat medical badge for his service in Iraq. "It has never affected my job performance before. I don't think it will make a difference now. And to be honest since then, I don't see a difference because of my homosexuality."

Read more: http://kxan.com/Global/story.asp?S=7597547
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonathanZ1982 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they let him stay now that he's out...
doesn't that destroy the argument for DADT? Anyone who is later discharged can cite him as proof that you can be gay and serve in the military without incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The argument for DADT was destroyed before it ever was signed into law by Clinton
There have always been gay men and women in the US military. Margarethe Cammermeyer's superiors knew that she was a lesbian years before she was kicked out; it was only in response to a security clearance interview that the matter was forced. Many others have been in exactly the same situation: as long as there is no need for official knowledge, they are allowed to serve, sometimes pretty openly. When the military is in forced servitude mode... excuse me, under a stop-loss order, gay people cannot be discharged solely on the grounds of homosexuality. There was an Arabic translator, who was outed during Operation Desert Storm. General discharge proceedings were started, then the stop-loss order came down. He went on to serve two more years under that stop-loss as an openly gay men, earned several commendations for his service, and then was summarily booted out on the grounds of homosexuality once the stop-loss was lifted without an honorable discharge.

The whole thing is and always has been a tremendously unfunny joke. Thanks, Bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC