Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA chief to drag White House into torture cover-up storm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:35 AM
Original message
CIA chief to drag White House into torture cover-up storm
Source: Times online

THE CIA chief who ordered the destruction of secret videotapes recording the harsh interrogation of two top Al-Qaeda suspects has indicated he may seek immunity from prosecution in exchange for testifying before the House intelligence committee.

Jose Rodriguez, former head of the CIA’s clandestine service, is determined not to become the fall guy in the controversy over the CIA’s use of torture, according to intelligence sources.

It has emerged that at least four White House staff were approached for advice about the tapes, including David Addington, a senior aide to Dick Cheney, the vice-president, but none has admitted to recommending their destruction.

Vincent Cannistraro, former head of counterterrorism at the CIA, said it was impossible for Rodriguez to have acted on his own: “If everybody was against the decision, why in the world would Jose Rodriguez – one of the most cautious men I have ever met – have gone ahead and destroyed them?”

The tapes recorded the interrogations of Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, two suspected Al-Qaeda leaders, over hundreds of hours while they were held in secret “ghost” prisons. According to testimony from a former CIA officer, Zubaydah was subjected to waterboarding, a form of torture that simulates drowning, and “broke” after 35 seconds. He is believed to have been interrogated in Thailand. The tapes were destroyed in 2005. Both men are now held in Guantanamo Bay.



Read more: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3087293.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. CIA Vs. Bushco.=Clash Of The Titans
They're going to the mat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. And the current generation of CIA admins hand
A big warm bowl of fuck you to Poppy Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
55. To Cheney and Addington.
Buckle up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. WHEEEEE!!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good. Whereas there are some things that are just a given (like White
House involvement) proof is always a wonderful thing to have. It makes it harder for that 25% (or whatever proportion) of idiots in this country to justify their support of a bunch of criminals that are running this country.

Although it also makes it impossible for some of us to support certain democrats who were in on the 'torture' secret long before the rest of us were told about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Hell... That 25% STILL Doesn't Believe Valerie Plame Was A Covert Operative...
despite all sorts of proof.

That 25% has a firewall for facts and reality.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Make the immunity contingent on a conviction of war crimes against white house officials.
Do not give a blanket immunity or his testimony will evaporate to a series of "I don't recall having any recollection of remembering that I had any memories of those events."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Exactly my thought, except....
I have a sneaking suspicion that they are going to do that anyway, if not outright saying they destroyed the tapes on their own and that Bush and company had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Time to slime Rodrieguez.
Like clock work the Whitehouse spin meisters will be digging up all the dirt they can on this guy. I expect Rush to have breaking info on Monday.

Its just the way they work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. This could get real interesting..
the CIA has been playing dirty
longer than current administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. My money is on the CIA
I hope it gets darn interesting and soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Dollar to a doughnut
the CIA kicks the
White House's ass
without overtime.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. There's a saying that *'s economy is destroying.
Getting to be a dollar vs. a doughnut is a even bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikto Donating Member (414 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
59. Wow...
That's a truly scary thought.

Sounds so...Soviet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. It would be just excellent if Addington got enmeshed in this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. "It's true. Me and my cronies are guilty." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 11:01 AM by SpiralHawk
"We doubtless deserve the same EVIL treatment we have been handing out. Go ahead. Punish us. Ever since official Bush White House Male Prostitute and B & D republicon kinkster Jeff Gannon started hanging out with us, we have become devotees of 'punishment.' Smirk, smirk, smirk."

- Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Who Was It That Said Something Like This:
"What is about to happen in this country is like tectonic plates shifting".

It's not an exact quote but it's close to what I remember hearing an ex cia official say. This was 4 years ago if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. Actually, that may have been Josh Marshall iirc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
66. I Think It Was Josh Marshall
his name does ring a bell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. Let's hope those tectonic plates shift soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brrrp Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. Every step forward always looks bigger than it really is.
And ever Congressional investigation after Watergate has been a coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Patience. Everything takes time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brrrp Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. You will wait forever. Every Congressional investigation is a coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. (off to Greatest you go) glad that British journos caught this story... it's not like
the MSM in the US is going to report it, i suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ptolle Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. irony
I agree that it's excellent that any journos caught this, but the irony to me is that it's British journos working for a now Murdoch rag.The thing that remains to be seen, as pointed out earlier, is whether this gets picked up and carried any further.Recall how the downing street memo seemed to sink like the titanic after the initial revelations.IMO you may be sure that the busheviks and the SCLM will do their best to bury this along with the revelations that the CIA may have withheld evidence from the 9/11 commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. for reals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiendish Thingy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sounds like a hint for a Christmas pardon n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kick and Recommend.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. I would love to see this day when he is granted immunity and squeels on BUCHCO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. WHO WILL BE THE 'LIBBY' THIS TIME?????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
50. the difference is, Rodriguez is no WH stooge, he's CIA
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 07:02 PM by wordpix
so that could get very interesting very quickly :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sound advice. Stay out of small planes and avoid tea at sushi restaurants.
If Rodriguez is going to flip on the BFEE, then he may very well be a marked man. Odds are this "chatter" is just a means to buy some hush money and comfort from the criminals in chief and soon we'll be hearing that Rodriguez is either going to fall on the sword or doesn't remember anything.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stalwart Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Power of Fear
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 02:44 PM by Stalwart
While immunity may protect from what the law might do, there is nothing like old fashion fear to influence things.

The fear of prosecution that immunity might remove simply has to be overcome by a greater fear of something that cannot be avoided.

How can they let anyone get away with telling the truth when the soft tools can't prevent? What he might say emboldens others?

In some dark, secret way an example has to be made. I fear for his life and well being but doubt that any direct physical action will be taken. They are more sophisticated than that. If they are good at making an example out of him we will never know it but those for which the example is set will certainly know it.

No records, no tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. I hope this doesn't turn into an Ollie North moment.
He was granted immunity, said he did it the thumbed his nose at Justice. Poppy gave everyone a pardon, including himself,and they high-fived each other as they exited stage right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
51. yes but where there's a free press via the internet, there's more hope this time
Trying to hang onto hope, here. :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #51
64. The World is watching.
I watched Ollie North testify before Congress, knowing all to well a lot of what really happened. I was there. I had to participate, even though I had made the case to my superiors that it was illegal and that "When Congress gets wind of this, they are going to cut our balls off." That was in January of 1982, long before the World became aware of what was going on.

I also watched in horror as they got away with it, but then I had literally seen them get away with Murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Opps - there goes that medal
Linda Chavez wanted to give him. Guessing Tony Blankley is wiping egg off his face about now.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here we go people, turn up the volume and hold onto your socks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. I can't imagine copies are the original tapes were not made, especially digitally...
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 12:43 PM by grahamhgreen
After all, these are the days of youtube.

If somebody digitized these tapes, they could be lurking anywhere....

It would be a good idea to track the exact movements of these tapes from the second they were removed from the camera.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
52. wondering the same---and someone might have wanted to keep them for personal files
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Has the House Intell Committee responded yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. They'll grant immunity. He'll testify. Nothing will happen
This Congress won't do jack $hit to stop this administration from anything. They are a pack of complicit criminals with a few sensible ones thrown in that are constantly painted as "radicals".

Sorry. I just can't get excited about any of this anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
68. Exactly
"These people" have broken every law imaginable as far as our Constitution is concerned, they have thumbed their noses at International Law. I'm afraid they'll get away with it. They haven't been carted off to jail yet, and I don't think they ever will be. But it would be a sweet sight to see them kicking, screaming and crying their eyes out as they are led away, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Rodriguez better lay low and stay out of sight in a secure location
until time to testify. Better stay off aircraft, too.

The committee needs to meet and grant immunity NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. oh please please please...somebody get this little bird a microphone!
it's ready to sing!!!!!!!

Finally, an administration hack that's not willing to be a fall guy like Libby and the others.

Sing me a tune, Mr. Rodriguez...sing me a beautiful impeachment-worthy tune!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
31. Sure is nice to see that citizens of Great Britain get to read this story
Maybe they can pass the news along to their American friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. Good. He is scum, but it is more important to expose the whole administration

And, he knows damn well that everyone is a sacrificial lamb for Bush & Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScooterFibby Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. The CIA isn't going to take another beating here
I'm sure there are politics within the CIA, but as an organization they've taken a lot of blame.

The CIA is blamed for Iraq, for the "failure of intelligence" BS.

They knew, and communicated what they knew, with appropriate qualifiers. The Bushies just wanted to go to war with Iraq.

They aren't going to be the fall guy again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
53. I would think CIA is still pissed at the Plame outing
They should be, anyhow. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
34. Can we impeach now?
Just hold the damn hearings and we can have the CIA testify then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. I think the CIA has had it
as well as the millitary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. That's my take too.. Mukasey should join them soon if he has any sense ... or
else Shumer and whoever that other Senator was who "recommended" Mukasey should lead the charge to
force him to uphold the law or resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
58. that other Senator is my other Senator
the malignant bitch Dianne Feinstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidMS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. This all should be premature.
Let the Judge finish hauling people up to the bench and figuring out who violated his order and then hold hearings. I always thought that federal judges whose court orders were ignored were much scarier than congregational committees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. Hey José! Stay out of small planes!
Stay off the phone as well as the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. The headline contradicts the article
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 03:31 PM by brentspeak
Headline says that Rodriguez will testify; the body of the article says that he may testify.

So, so far, this is just rumor, British-tabloid style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
44. KICK & RECOMMEND
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. One doesn't need immunity from this lame ass congress n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #46
65. Witnesses need immunity from subsequent criminal prosecution -
not immunity from Congress. Hence the catchphrase: "I decline to answer on the grounds that it may tend to incriminate me." Testimony under oath may be used in subsequent civil OR criminal actions.
From Wikipedia:
"Civil or criminal proceedings
Fifth Amendment protections apply wherever and whenever an individual is compelled to testify. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the right against self-incrimination applies whether the witness is in Federal or state court (see Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)), and whether the proceeding itself is criminal or civil (see McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34 (1924)).

People have asserted the right in grand jury or in congressional hearings in the 1950s, where witnesses testifying before the House Committee on Un-American Activities or the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee claimed the right in response to questions concerning their alleged membership in the Communist Party. However, due to the Red Scare hysteria of the times, frequently referred to as McCarthyism, people who have asserted the right were popularly seen as guilty as accused, and sometimes referred to as "Fifth Amendment Communists"; people have lost their jobs, lost their leadership positions in union or political organizations, or had other negative repercussions after "taking the fifth." Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-Wisc.) was famous for his question, "Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Communist party," while he was chairman of the Senate Government Operations Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Even admitting to previous Communist party membership was not sufficient; people were also required to "name names," that is, to implicate others they knew to be Communists or who had been Communists in the past. For example, Academy Award winning director Elia Kazan testified before the House Committee on Un-American Activities that he had belonged to the Communist party briefly in his youth; in addition, he "named names," which earned him the enmity of many in Hollywood. Other entertainment professionals, such as Zero Mostel, found themselves on a Hollywood Blacklist after taking the fifth, and were unable to find work for some period afterwards in the entertainment industry."

The amendment has also been used by defendants and witnesses in criminal cases involving the Mafia. The Supreme Court has also used the incorporation doctrine to apply the self-incrimination clause against the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Oh...I see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Android3.14 Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
47. They'll get 'em this time, by jiminy!
It's not going to be like alllllll those other times. Nope. The Democrats have been keeping their powder dry for just this moment. You watch, all you worn out cynical patriots. The system is going to work fer shur this time.

Gore kept the powder dry, Kerry kept it dry, Edwards powered up the dehumidifier, and Pelosi has kept the powder so dry it sucks the moisture right out of her eyes, and we can all remember Merry Fitzmas.

Gosh, I am...like...so thrilled to see this administration finally get what it deserves. In fact, I am going to invest in champagne and cigars just so I can cheer and light one up just like a proud daddy when they finally haul Bush off to jail.

/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
54. yeh he better worry because that's what's coming for him
but maybe the CIA will do in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
56. Ooh Pop the Popcorn...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
57. Gee... I wonder who will take the heat then. ADDINGTON?
Duh.

Anyone but Cheney or Bush. Or Condi.

:banghead:

Oh well... might as well sit back and enjoy whatever happens.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. Having commuted Scooter
the Bushies think Congress hath no sting, or unemployment any victory.

These boyz in the exec think they are the all highest.
Truth is, Cheney's prowess with a shotgun is small beans compared to what the CIA has in its arsenal.

I think they may experience a rude shock to the system as they are re-introduced to the reality based community with a resounding smack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaStrega Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
60. putting it lightly?
"Silvestre Reyes, a Democrat who is chairing the committee, has said he was “not looking for scapegoats” – a hint to Rodriguez that he would like him to talk."

Would *like* him to talk? Understatement much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woundedkarma Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
62. My completely made up timeline :)
OKay so...

Plame gets outed by the white house.

The CIA finally wisens up and decides to fight back and stops delaying the NIE. (they said the WH ran out of political muscle in the intelligence agencies that they were using to hold the report back for more than a year already)

The White House(anyone know where the tape information first got leaked????) leaks the tape information in the hopes it will hit the CIA where it hurts and frame them for the whole torture scandal.

The CIA points out it was TOLD to destroy the tapes by the White House.

It might be my imagination here but it DOES seem like there's a war going on between the White House and the CIA. The WH has been trying to screw the CIA a lot lately and umm... it's a mistake if you ask me.

Until Plame got outed... I think the CIA was still happy to be in league with Bushco.. simply cause his father and Cheney. NOW however, first they blamed a lack of intelligence of 911 on the intelligence community. Then they betray a covert agent. Now the tapes and the WH may not have leaked the information but they sure as heck aren't standing up for the CIA... in fact they're pointing all fingers at them.

I think this is a good thing if the CIA has finally realized that Bush is willing to attack even his best allies to keep himself safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Check out emptywheel's timeline
Emptywheel, aka Marcy Wheeler, is the best at putting together timelines...

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2007/12/22/recycling-torture-timelines/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
69. If he sings, it's going to be one delicious song! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
70. Who is guarding this man 24 /7 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC