Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-congresswoman seeks presidency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:18 PM
Original message
Ex-congresswoman seeks presidency
Source: Yahoo news

ATLANTA - Former Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who was ousted from office last year after a headline-grabbing scuffle with a Capitol Hill police officer, has decided to seek the presidency — as a Green Party candidate.

In a video posted on the Internet on Tuesday, McKinney criticized the war in Iraq and complained about Democrats and Republicans, saying both parties are beholden to corrupt corporate interests. She called the Green Party "my new political home."

McKinney, 52, registered to vote in California after a group called Run! Cynthia! Run! began drafting her as the Green Party's candidate there. Since then, she had made campaign appearances in Texas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071219/ap_on_el_pr/mckinney_president_2



I hope to gosh she doesn't get selected by the Green Party. She could be enough of a problem to change the outcome, depending upon the major party candidates...One more reason to support Edwards who not only is more appealing to independents and republicans, but is running on the same issues she is: corporatists in both parties, the war, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope the libertarians and the constitution party select candidates of equalor greater statute.
Edited on Wed Dec-19-07 11:33 PM by Heaven and Earth
That way, whatever percentage the greens take from the left will be more than offset from the right. Perhaps Bob Barr and Roy Moore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or better yet, "evangelicals" split with Republicans and create their own party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. McKinney runs for President
Edited on Wed Dec-19-07 11:39 PM by mac2
McKinney is a great Progressive Democrat. She lost the election due to lies and election fraud in GA. The Democratic leadership did not scream or insist on investigations.

It shows how they (DLC)get excited about a male black man but not a black woman. It's a shame how the party treated her forcing her to run as a Green candidate. Why not as an Independent? Guess global warming is the issue?

Also Obama is no Progressive which is upsetting considering his people are suffering and need a leader in DC with some power. Where was the outrage over Katrina?

Nader didn't lose the election for Gore or Kerry. The fixed election did. We won don't you remember? Our party leaders in both cases gave in too early and didn't insist on recounts, voter fraud investigations, etc.

I'd like to hear her get a position on the stage to voice Progressive concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think Cynthia rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I met her at our last Beach Impeach action.
She must be 100 lbs soaking wet and she's full of energy. :)

The race she lost was dirty as hell. I wish she'd gear up to run again as a Dem for Congress but she must know what she's doing better than I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. ? Even though nader took 90,000 votes in Florida in 2000 ?
I guess in some ideal world, spoilers don't actually spoil. In reality, in Forida, in 2000, I would say Nader acted as a spoiler.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Except that Gore got the most votes.
Since Gore actually won in Florida, Nader wasn't a spoiler.

There was only one 'spoiler' in Florida: George W. Bush, whose organization and cronies stole the election for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. I guess one sees what one wants to see.
Nader made it tens of thousands of votes easier for Baker and Company to steal Florida. If he had accomplished some great purpose, maybe it would be worth it. But I don't see that he had any constructive effect on US politics. To me, his presidential run, and concentrating on swing states, is just an adolescent, petulant selfish way of grandstanding his opposition to the system, without having any responsibility for actually winning or governing. If the Greens really want to move the country left, why don't they run local, state and House of Reps candidates in districts where they actually COULD win? Of course, then they would have some responsibility for governing, which is more complex and demanding than just loudly pointing out how bad everything is all the time.

I just think running a candidate in the presidential contest, knowing that a) you won't win a single state and b) you are very likely to make things easier for the right wing to win/steal/plunder has more to do with personal gratification than actually making things better. In THEORY, you could move the Dems to the left. In PRACTICE, at least the way Nader does it, you just get more rightwing fascist nutjobs installed (whether honestly elected or not).

Sorry, I guess I just don't see it the way you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. No, in the real world, they were going to steal FL, Nader or no Nader. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. it makes people feel good about themselves to blame Nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
53. Yeah. It makes the whole mess more manageable and
the DLC thanks us for looking away. Everybody is happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Not voter fraud! Election Fraud!
Big difference, voter fraud means that individual voters are perpetrating fraud and is the basis for republican pushes for voter IDs and other obstruct the vote efforts. Election fraud is the manipulation of election results.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. She should do what she feels
she needs to do.

Lets see, we could now possibly have the following...

Democratic nominee

Republican nominee

Independent nominee

Libertarian nominee

Green nominee

Starting to sound more like a democracy to me. Maybe the Democratic Party will be forced to sit up and take notice of the progressives and give us what we want, or loose them to a real challenger for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Hmm
It sounds like an interesting scenario and a winnable scenario if the Democrats actually offer up someone that actually sounds like a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well then, at least Hillary isn't the only woman candidate!
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 12:07 AM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Nor Obama the only black candidate...assuming Cynthia is even nominated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Very true! And.........
Are those who do not support her to be labaled both sexist AND racist, I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. sounds like sour grapes to me
The Democratic party hasn't changed greatly in the last two years. I'm all for there being lots of parties and everyone voting for who best represents their positions (one of the reasons we should have instant run off voting), but if this woman is all about being a Green, she could have run for congress as a Green candidate in her last term, or switched parties once she was voted in. I don't have any more respect for this switch than I do for Republicans switching parties (especially in 'moderate' states) because they can't be elected with an "R" next to their name anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Greens worked to defeat Wellstone and Lamont
They will work to defeat the Democrat in any election, no matter who the nominee is.

G etting
R epublicans
E lected
E very
N ovember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'll have to notify my Green friends who phone banked for Kerry on their
own dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Please do
So many people don't realize that Greens run against good Dems all the time. Your friends weren't working to defeat Kerry like the Cobb supporters were, so they probably get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Greens run against good Dems because they belong to another party.
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 02:13 PM by sfexpat2000
Iirc, there was a big split in the Green Party over what to do in 2004 because we all knew that George Bush was a homicidal maniac and so was everyone in his Cabinet. Some of us worked for Kerry, some chose to work for Cobb.

And if you recall, the Ohio recount and all the evidence it produced wouldn't have happened without the Greens' willingness to go in and get dirty. Cobb's people convinced the Libertarians to go in too, but the Green Party quarterbacked it.

There are @ssholes and cheats and scoundrels in every political party. I don't recognize the Greens I know when I read DU but, I don't know many @ssholes and cheats and scoundrels in person.

lol

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. And of course the Constitution mandates that two parties control all.
I'm not happy about vote splits that could help tip yet another election toward the bigger crooks, but we need parliamentary government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. We need tip the balance back in favor of voters and away from
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 02:47 PM by sfexpat2000
the corporate wing of the two big parties. I'm for whatever makes that happen and I hope my mom doesn't read this.

Campaign financing reform. And, no, I have no idea how we can ever make that happen. Not with millionaires running Congress. Why would they vote against themselves and their way of life? :shrug:

I've lately had moments of outright fury whenever my emailbox is spammed by X Democrat asking for a donation. Because I don't want to feed this system that asks for my $50 and gives all the benefit to DynCorp and Boeing and Pfizer et al. Nancy turns on me and disowns me when I try to have a conversation with her and I'm supposed to just keep on funding THAT? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Yep. "It's the money, stupid."
We let money buy votes, and--surprise, surprise!--it turns out that money votes for itself.

A system that lets this go on may be hopelessly corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
59. I hear ya on that... I still haven't fogiven them for Bush in 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. if she loses the nomination
will her father blame those J-E-W-S
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Probably, because there is apparently no valid reason Cynthia could lose an election
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 12:25 PM by Mike Daniels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. People like McKinney are needed in the Democratic Party.
Sad to see it come to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
20. That woman sure is "uppity"...
.. and I love her for it! :loveya:

McKinney was thrown under the bus repeatedly by the Dems. I remember her having the balls to actually publically question the true origins of 9/11 at a time no one else did. She also showed up at anti-war rallies before the invasion -- something very few, if any, of our national Democratic leaders had the nerve to do.

Good for her for running. I will appreciate her voice in this election cycle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. This is the woman who said that Al Gore had a low "Negro tolerance level"
Apperently she never met Gore's 2000 campaign manager:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ousted Georgia lawmaker to run for president (Cynthia McKinney)
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 12:01 PM by sinkingfeeling
Source: CNN.com

ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- Former Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who was ousted from office last year after a headline-grabbing scuffle with a Capitol Hill police officer, has decided to seek the presidency -- as a Green Party candidate.

McKinney, 52, registered to vote in California after a group called Run! Cynthia! Run! began drafting her as the Green Party's candidate there. Since then, she had made campaign appearances in Texas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

"The Democrats do not speak for us," she said. "The Democrats are no different than their Republican counterparts."

One of her final acts in Congress was to introduce a bill to impeach President Bush, saying he misled Congress into approving the war in Iraq and violated the law by secretly spying on citizens. She once claimed Bush had been warned of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/20/mckinney.president.ap/index.html



Cynthia McKinney is running as one of 7 Green Party presidental candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Gotta give her credit !... She was definitely right-on about
Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Oh God not again.
:puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yes, the anti-Semitic woman who claimed Gore was a racist...
Apparently some DUers have not learned the lessons of 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Do you have a source for that? Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Here's one source...
Cynthia McKinney: The rep who cries racism.

"And during the 2000 presidential campaign, she wrote that "Gore's Negro tolerance level has never been too high. I've never known him to have more than one black person around him at any given time." Never mind that Gore's campaign manager was black."

http://www.slate.com/?id=2064530
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. How does that hit piece document anti-Semitism?
Holy cow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I thought you were asking about the Gore part.
It's her father who is famous for his anti-Semitic views.

I live in her former district. She constantly accused others of racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Maybe because she was constantly subjected to it. It gets to you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. her father blamed Jews for her defeat
completely ignoring the fact that she's queen of the moonbats


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Yes, because she's been wrong about everything
from the stolen 2004 election to WMD.

Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. Not to mention the fact that she was right on top of the BCCI scandal
But no, she's just a "loon" and a "moon bat" because...

Of saying something uncomplimentary about The Most Holy and Blessed St. Al Gore?

Of her father making an anti-Semitic statement?

Of making the Republicans and their enablers in the Democratic party uncomfortable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. There's something wrong with me. I LOVE uppity little brown women
who challenge our daily ration of bullshit.

Like this one who taught to challenge our daily ration of bullshit over my Cheerios. lol



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah well...
she's black, she's a woman, and she's progressive. According to many posts I've read here there's no fucking way this white-bread, limp-dicked, brain-washed society could possibly consider electing such a brew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. Don't be surprised to see GOP operatives funding her campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. For pete's sake. Operatives from both parties fund the opposition
whenever and wherever they can. I thought that was what money was for.

One of these days, I want to track down who the DLC funds against progressive Dems. I'm betting they give the Thuggery a run for their money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. the repugs have funded green candidates in Pennsylvania and Washington state
that we know about

I have never heard about Democrats funding any right wing parties


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
54. What do you think the DLC has been doing all this time?
They've been moving the party to the right from within. They kill progressive candidates who make an honest run in the primaries. Who needs Republicans when you have the DLC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. come on!
you know I love you but AAARRRGGGHHHH

we now have a majority in both houses because of moderate to conservative Democrats

I'd love to have how ever many Pete Starks but the reality is that you have districts where liberal/left politicians will not win

we as liberal/leftists tend to write off voters that disagree with us but we have to listen to them

short of revolution, there is no way to implement every policy we want

I know there will be a day when same sex marriage will be accepted

will it be tomorrow, NO

single payer health-care

tomorrow-no

we can't simply dismiss those who have valid objections




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Sorry. I think I was having an attack of cynicism.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. you're forgiven
hehehe


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
58. Can't remember who was that last time that got the GOP $$$
It was quite disgusting and scandalous! The swanky apartment and the $$$. I remember reading just a scathing article about all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
37. This is all I will say about McKinney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #37
62. LOL
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
39. Irrelevant. Diebold/ES&S decides. And guess who all...
voted for, supported and helped to keep the American people ignorant about 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code in all the new voting systems all over the land, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations?

The same people who violated their oaths to uphold the Constitution when a capitol guard tried to stop a member of Congress from entering Congress--a Constitutional protection for the peoples' representatives with a 500 year old history that was put into the Constitution FOR A REASON. NO ONE--no cop of any kind, for any reason--may stop a member of Congress from entering Congress. Our Constitution died that day--just as our democracy died, or rather was killed, in October 2002, with the passage of the so-called "Help America Vote Act."

So all you Cynthia McKinney haters--and Green Party despisers--can thank OUR OWN PARTY LEADERSHIP for who will decide who our candidate is, in 2008, and who wins in November, and for failing to defend the Constitution on this and on every other attack on the Constitution that the Bushites have mounted.

Cynthia McKinney is not the "enemy." I'm sorry to say that most of our party leadership are the ones who have betrayed us, and I'll be damned if I know what to do about it, except to urge people to...

THROW DIEBOLD, ES&S AND ALL ELECTION THEFT MACHINES INTO 'BOSTON HARBOR' NOW!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
49. Yep. Georgia is where it all started
when Dem amputee-vet Max Cleland lost his senate race to internationally un-famous rich guy Saxby Chambliss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
50. Your subject line scared the bejeebus out of me.





I was sure we had heard the last of her.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
57. I am an Independent
and johnnyboy does NOT appeal to me.

Link to that outrageous statement, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
60. Sorry just not too enthused about this... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
63. Good luck but the pugs will just steal this election too.
Their machine is already in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leaninglib Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
64. Please go away, Cynthia. You are such an embarrassment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
65. AHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!11
HAHAHA!!!!!!!11111 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! :puke: :puke: :puke:

Ahem.

Hehe. hehehehehHEHEHAHAGAHAHAHAHAHA!~!!1!!1 :eyes: :crazy: :eyes: :crazy:

Really... just...

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC