Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel No Nuclear Threat To Neighbors, Says Gates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:50 PM
Original message
Israel No Nuclear Threat To Neighbors, Says Gates
Source: Reuters

MANAMA (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates defended Israel's nuclear program on Saturday, saying the Jewish state did not seek to destroy its neighbors or support terrorism, unlike Iran.

Asked at the Manama Dialogue conference whether he thought Israel's nuclear program posed a threat to the region, Gates replied: "No, I do not."

The statement was greeted by laughter from a room filled with government officials from Middle Eastern countries.

--
He dismissed the allegation that the United States applied a double standard on the nuclear issue by supporting Israel while calling for Iran to abandon its enrichment activities, which Tehran says are for peaceful purposes.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSL0866169420071208
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. The statement was greeted by laughter...
As it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any NUCLEAR is a threat to the neighbors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. The False Noise On Planet Stupid
The belligerent and bellicose country with lots of nukes is no threat to use them, while the bellicose but historically non-belligerent country without any nukes is a big threat.

Only on Planet Stupid. My kind of planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. But Israel has 60 to 80 known nuclear weapons and BushCo had
...has given an additional unknown number of nuclear warhead tipped missiles which Israel could launch at any time against their neighbors

<snip>
DIA Estimate For Israeli Nuclear Weapons

Israel has not confirmed that it has nuclear weapons and officially maintains that it will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East. Yet the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons is a "public secret" by now due to the declassification of large numbers of formerly highly classified US government documents which show that the United States by 1975 was convinced that Israel had nuclear weapons.

<cut to middle - see Table in article>

CIA estimates of the Israeli arsenal's size did not improve with time. In 1974, Duckett estimated that Israel had between ten and twenty nuclear weapons. The upper bound was derived from CIA speculation regarding the number of possible Israeli targets, and not from any specific intelligence. Because this target list was presumed to be relatively static, this remained the official American estimate until the early 1980s.

The actual size and composition of Israel's nuclear stockpile is uncertain and the subject of many - often conflicting - estimates and reports. It is widely reported that Israel had two bombs in 1967, and that Prime Minister Eshkol ordered them armed in Israel's first nuclear alert during the Six-Day War. It is also reported that, fearing defeat in the October 1973 Yom Kippur War, the Israelis assembled 13 twenty-kiloton atomic bombs.

Israel could potentially have produced a few dozen nuclear warheads in the period 1970-1980, and is thought to have produced sufficient fissile material to build 100 to 200 warheads by the mid-1990s. In 1986 descriptions and photographs of Israeli nuclear warheads were published in the London Sunday Times of a purported underground bomb factory at the Dimona nuclear reactor. The photographs were taken by Mordechai Vanunu, a dismissed Israeli nuclear technician. His information led some experts to conclude that Israel had a stockpile of 100 to 200 nuclear devices at that time.

By the late 1990s the U.S. Intelligence Community estimated that Israel possessed between 75-130 weapons, based on production estimates. The stockpile would certainly include warheads for mobile Jericho-1 and Jericho-2 missiles, as well as bombs for Israeli aircraft, and may include other tactical nuclear weapons of various types. Some published estimates even claimed that Israel might have as many as 400 nuclear weapons by the late 1990s. We believe these numbers are exaggerated, and that Israel's nuclear weapons inventory may include less than 100 nuclear weapons. Stockpiled plutonium could be used to build additional weapons if so decided.

Excerpt from 160-page secret DIA report, first disclosed and reproduced in Rowan Scarborough, Rumsfeld's War (Regnery, 2004), pp. 194-223.

<MORE>

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Very likely a MAD standoff
that by our standards is very dangerous and hairtrigger. That is, ANY large event against Israel could be presumed to be known and/supported ahead of time by the various Arab nations and their intel sources. therefore they very likely have a standing ultimatum that would involve ALL the ME getting hit bad in defensive retaliation- or in this case as a preventive assurety. That is not the status of the Cold War MAD. This is small enough to happen for multiple reasons with a devastating effect everywhere- which also blackmails the oil consuming world.

Stop our consumption of oil and the threat to Israel when fewer people are forced to stop them gets worse. The choice of nukes and other policies has gotten them deeper and deeper into an unsustainable MAD with peace quite possibly actually making things more dangerous for them. The other path they must take is equally fraught with risk to national survival, but more supportive of human survival. That path is disarmament and world peace to defeat the truly MAD forces of RW violence. This current path, paved by Nazi heritage and old familial allies, guarantees that everyone "out there" is locked in a predictable final destruction that will inevitably benefit others. Cheney even supplies nukes to Muslims to stoke the engine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. But Iran IS!
Yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because Israel has such Sane Leadership
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wolf no risk to lambs, says lion.
Lion invites wolf to lamb dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pegleg Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think Israel has a lingering memory of who was allied with the Nazis
during the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. You mean Japan and Italy? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pardon me while I scoff openly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. What?
Israel has NEVER admitted to having a nuclear program....NOR HAVE THEY AGREED TO THE NON PROLIFERATION TREATY.....NOR HAVE THEY ALLOWED ANY INSPECTIONS BECAUSE THEY NEVER ADMITTED THERE WAS A PROGRAM.

So........on the other hand we have Iran - which DID sign the non-proliferation treaty....and has allowed inspections.....and they are the threat?

No double standard........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. double standard
He dismissed the allegation that the United States applied a
double standard....

double standard what double standard :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. I actually doubt that any government is a real nuclear threat to its NEIGHBOURS
Nuke your neighbour, and watch your own country perish quickly or slowly from nuclear fallout that knows no borders.

The real danger could arise if a country wished to nuke a faraway country; or if terrorists, who are prepared to die for their beliefs, got access to nukes.

However, I still think the world would be much safer if no one got any new nukes; and if those who do have them, would enter negotiations for disarmament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Your right, however
Israel has never admitted to having a nuclear program. No admission - no negotiations - no disarmament.

One of the big issues with the middle eastern states is that Israel has never signed the non-proliferation treaty and has not allowed inspections and has never admitted to having nuclear weapons.....even though we all knew they had them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, I wish he'd shut his big, fat mouth.
Talk about things the big bullies don't need to know about the short geek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. As long as Israel officially "has no nukes", that statement is true
In the reality-based world, of course, they're one of the biggest threats in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Gates is lying. Besides, the law is the law, and must be applied
US domestic law prohibits military aid to states that have nuclear weapons that are not part of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. What happenned in Lebanon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. Gates told the truth, and everybody goddamn well knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. Gates is very, very good!
At comedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC